|
Bisexuality; A Dangerous Conundrum
By Jonathan J Joslin
Contents
Preamble
Introduction
1) Understanding The Confines of Human Sexuality
(a) Misconceptions through Unjustified Political Correctness.
(b) The Inherent Connection To A Particular Gender That Makes Sexuality.
(c) Different Sexual States And Levels.
2) A Necessary Distinction
(a) The Three Sexualities And Their Distinction’s.
(b) What Is The Confines Of Sexuality That Homosexuals Are Accused Of Being.
3) (Life Choice theory)
(a) A Logical Interpretation Of The Life Choice Theory.
(b) Judgement, purely by perception.
4) Core Of The Problem Causing The Debate (Perception)
(a) Human Perception, (A Genuine Perspective Of Sexuality’s).
(b) Human Morality – Humanism.
5) A Perspective Of Consequences From The Perception of Bisexual LGBT Group Leaders
(a) Promoting Education Of Sexuality From Bisexual Perspective
(b) Heterosexual Parents Perspective On Such Education Being Taught to Heterosexual Children (No Identification With Such A Nature From Other Sexualities.)
(c) Confusing Homosexual Children Of Their Sexuality By Flawed Bias Based On Of Life Choice Theory.
(d) Rejected Materials from Health and Education Authorities.
(e) Bisexual Political Activists Unknowingly Discriminating & Victimising Homosexuals From Childhood through Education Reform, And The Social Scene.
(f) Conclusion, (Catch 22 In Producing Education Materials)
6) Understanding What Materials Are Needed To Be Taught In Schools.
(A Case Study; researched in 2001-2002)
(a) The Homosexual Social Scene.
(b) Flawed Government Health Research On HIV & Aids.
(c) The Conditioning At The Heart Of Heterosexual Society.
(d) What If No Such Materials Existed.
(e) Prospects That Neither Side Of The Issue Have Contemplated.
7) Final Conclusion (Social Conditioning: How easy is it to be conditioned)
(a) The Collection Of Stigma Labels Used To Abuse.
(b) If Homosexuality & Bisexuality Is Seen As Natural, Why Refuse Marriage Laws.
(c) Do Any Rights Groups Really Know What Materials Are Needed In Schools.
Preamble
The grounds behind the B-F-P project was four years of genuine sociology and psychology research conducted and produced by B-F-P on the issues from HIV & Aids research, law, legislation, to sexuality from the psychological perspective of the three perceived sexualities: Bisexuality, Homosexuality & Heterosexuality. This was done to find the core of the problem to the international debate and finding out what education curriculum material are needed in schools on sexuality.
Introduction
During 2001 - July 2002 this psychology research was conducted for the purpose of the B-F-P social reform project that is in present development. During the research on every ground of the issue on sexuality in understanding the practicality and logistics behind the truth of it, B-F-P found an unforeseen mystery as to how and what sexuality really is perceived to be by all, and has revealed a catch 22 in fighting oppression that has been caused by this perception. The reasons behind this confounded issue, was to discover the true core of a problem behind why so many believe that one sexuality is inherent and the rest are a life choice, and why there are so many who believe they never made such a choice of Homosexuality, even when accused of such an acquired life by “members” of their own prospective minority, where such members believe they are Homosexuals who made such a life choice of Homosexuality to accuse others of the same choice. In 2001 B-F-P reviewed a vast amount of international material on prejudice views of the stigma that Homosexuality is a life choice to be that way. This material was not confined to religious prejudice or the bias Heterosexual perspective on the issue: a vast amount was found through every form of the LGBT community press and rights groups views on gay lifestyles, gay living, on being gay, being ok to be gay, its ok if you want to be gay, reasons & views based on those premises in fighting for law & rights, and what laws should be fought for, and which laws had the least presidents to the issue of the morality on what was needed to support Homosexuals as a people and a minority; when there was actually a complete other side to this coin, from another majority of the same community that believe they are discriminated against by their own community; Genuine Homosexuals with an inherent connection form birth to only the same sex. You may feel that last statement was ambiguous, discriminatory or even confusing. Through an investigation on education materials into the LGBT community and their LGBT public’s personal views, B-F-P found a serious and dangerous situation based on looking at the entire political & moral debate from the psychological perspective of Bisexuality, on how Bisexuals perceive and surmise the reality of sexuality in relation to what they believe Homosexuality & Heterosexuality is, and the consequences that that perspective induces a conditioning on others through politics, fighting for rights and all types of national media. This conditioning has left the largest majority of Bisexuals in the global population of the LGBT community to believe they are Homosexuals who made a life choice to be that way, who also find being called a Bisexual offensive. In June 2002 B-F-P conducted a 300-person survey within the London social scene of the LGBT community to obtain and general perspective of the LGBT community on what they believe sexuality is, in relation to themselves. This survey was an anonymous questionnaire and contained only questions relating to a persons self-evident understanding of their own nature in relation to other sexualities, which it did not contain any questions or references on sexual behaviour or sexual preferences. The findings of this survey revealed startling results, and these findings were compared to every form of national and international entertainment & current affairs media that B-F-P had researched the previous year on the general populations views regardless of sexuality on what is believed to be Homosexuality & Bisexuality through braking down the exact meanings of every written & verbal statement, and views made on the subject in relation to a persons standing and knowledge of their own sexuality
The results in brief, found by B-F-P not only explain exactly how all perceive the issue sexuality, it explains a seriously misunderstood international common misconception of sexuality and all the consequences thereof, which go as far as civil rights and all LGBT media’s unknowingly working against equality over the past 40 years and indorsing & instituting inequality into society as a whole, through mutually dependant social conditioning, that has created a catalyst of endlessly looping dilemmas and circumstances of which there is no escape, that is an international catch 22 on fighting oppression to a level they couldn’t possibly fathom the consequences. And an unknown and unprecedented act of discrimination, harassment and victimisation specifically on genuine Homosexuals by Bisexuals in the LGBT community media and rights groups systems, without actually realising they were doing it, to even perceive any possible consequences thereof.
The residual conclusions of research discovered a new premise of consequences and revealed an unexplored angle on what is imperatively needed to be taught in schools to all children on sexuality, which has absolutely nothing to do with the scientific aspects of sex education.
Chapter 1,
The Confines of Human Sexuality.
This brief is strategically written for you to understand every part of it and m any sections that contain material that many believe to be not true, but this deliberate, as it continually explores particular beliefs, issues, ideals of every side of the debate to get core of the problem that created them, by cover many different personal beliefs which are contrary to one another; these parts are “more than relevant” to the legal implications of these new laws, as these new laws and a religious ministry dossier that B-F-P has found are based those anomalies. So please read this brief objectively?
Over the past 40 years activists and civil rights lobby groups have fought hard to obtain civil and legal standing as a minority and a community of people against a global prejudice oppression. So the a question must be asked; Do civil rights and activists know exactly why the global LGBT community are denied every civil right, benefit and law that they fight for. Most people will believe its prejudice and hate because of an act of sex the general society does not like and they’re just bigots. You only have to look at any religious debate on the subject that dictates, the belief of Heterosexuals religious or not, believe that Homosexuality is a “life choice” vice of an act of sex.
But, what exactly is, this choice in relation too. Because it has never been recorded of any civil rights campaign against this Heterosexual specific belief. Very few people in society hate purely for the sake of hating, hate will always have a reason. Where would it leave civil rights groups if they realised this reason had nothing to do with the prejudice over disgust of a particular sexual behaviour? If that’s true, it puts the fight for equality into a completely different ball game, and you can’t fight fire with fire; you must first understand why it’s burning. Over the past few years a rift has been building within the UK LGBT community, on a accusations that the LGBT community as a whole needs more unity to further the fight against inequality.
B-F-P through its research has made some alarming discoveries about the LGBT community that is causing this rift, and believe it or not, this rift is being created over the belief systems on the issue of what sexuality is. And B-F-P has found that the largest percent of civil rights lobby groups have been directly discriminating against and victimising all Homosexual men and women over the past 40 years in their promoted prêt-elections on what sexuality is in fighting inequality, and they don’t realise they are doing it. But the LGBT community public have to accept this discrimination because they are only ones is fighting for them in legal reform. However much one would like to believe one truly knows and understands what sexuality actually is, B-F-P has found very few people actually do from every side of the debate, and it that that is creating the core of the problem to this rift, and it is core of the problem to international oppression.
The highest priority of every human rights law is written to fully support the whole human family that is based on the natural aspects in life of inherent dignity, which means from birth and without a choice. This is explained in the interpretation introduction preamble of all Human rights laws, as anything else is acquired, meaning a choice, optional or changeable, and has the least status of protection under any human rights laws, and where religious freedom is seen as higher priority than the basic human rights of a minority of human beings. The whole basis of the political and religious debate against Homosexuality and the civil rights agenda, is hidden in the following statement that prejudice politicians and religious ministers, priests, bishops and churches always use against Homosexuality:> [Homosexuality is life choice to be that way, it is neither natural or normal, there is no moral equivalence between Homosexuality and Heterosexuality]
Do you know what a life choice to be that way really means, and what it is in relation too? Do you know what would make that moral equivalence?
Does anyone really no what sexuality really is?
B-F-P has found that very very very few people know what sexuality actually is
You will most likely feel like skipping the next part believing you know all what is necessary on the subject of the confines of Human Sexuality.
(a) Misconceptions through unjustified political correctness
For centuries since society built an international social stigma over Homosexuality being a life choice, many people from both sides of the debate over past four decades have tried to make a distinction on sexuality to justify personal beliefs, possible realities and issues. Unfortunately every distinction that has been voiced by both side’s of the debate have left out one major factor on what sexuality actually is, and in doing so, they institutionalise a premise that sexuality is behavioural based which furthers the stigma of choice. For decades various religions, ministries, councils, sociology groups, health authority's, politicians and LGBT rights groups have made endless statements of belief that sexuality is apparently experimented and fixed at puberty between the ages of 10 to 16. This is completely unfounded as the only individual’s qualified to give any true definition of sexuality would be a psychologist. Were these people 100% sure or have conclusive proof before making any voiced opinions or statutory claims. If you believe sexuality is experimented and fixed at a certain age, It can be explained why you would believe such a premise. Contrary to what most people would like to believe, behaviour does not make sexuality. Are you confused?
The Core Basis Of Sexuality;
The only way to find the truth about what makes human sexuality, and find its point of origin, is by removing from a person, every material and physical need and want and all elements of motivation of material purpose as a member of society. This would only leave the natural inherent drive & soul purpose of a human being.
Every child from the youngest ages can identify the inherent connection of which their natural drive directs them as they grow and see the people and the environment of people around them, and mainly within all other children around them. This is the inherent connection to a particular sex-(M/F), meaning the permanent inherent psychological and physiological connection to another gender regardless of sexual needs, of which can not be ignored, eradicated, turned on or off, or be manipulated, and most children will not understand it as sexuality, or recognise it as being sexual in anyway until around the ages of 5-7, and that is without any form of sexual experience or knowledge, but a child will recognise this inherent connection from the earliest ages. As every child is brought up in every different type of environment, it will be the up bringing by their parents on which that child would recognise their natural connection, more or less than others. As a child grows he or she will learn to understand what their sexuality means by the age of 8-11. Many young teenagers will have their first sexual experiences between the ages of 9 & 16 (this mainly, will not involve intercourse of any kind) and this has been wrongly labelled by official Government sources, politicians and national entertainment media as “experimentation”.
Experimentation: To experiment in sex is to intentionally make a consented act of sexual conduct based on an adrenalin rush of sexual arousal without any coercion by sexual attraction or by an inherent connection to a particular gender- (M/F). Solely on the possibility of seeing if it appeals to one or if one might enjoy the experience of it with that type of person, on the basis of sexual relief or curiosity. Even if that gender-(M/F) of the consented other is a gender which he or she would or would not be normally sexually attracted.
The Inherent connection of sexuality: Instead of a responsive prompted action based on a deep, natural, physiological & psychological attachment in a need to make physical contact based on a human driven sexual attraction through a naturally driven inherent connection to a particular gender.
Understanding the inherent connection: If you are confused as to what this means, it can be very easily explained. For example: If any person was to close their eyes and tried not to think about sex ever again, or if they tried not to fall in love, or if they tried to make every effort to work against feeling sexual for a particular gender-(male/female); they would still know, that if they ever continue to feel for another gender, what that gender is that they are inherent connected too. You cannot remove that inherent connection, or even turn it off, or eradicate it, or work against it, because what ever is inherent is from birth; anything else is acquired, meaning a choice. Any person can make a conscious choice on the person they choose to have sex with, but it is absolutely impossible for any human being to make a conscious choice of eternal marital love on the person of which they fall in love. The true core origin of sexuality is an unchangeable inherently connected physiology to a particular gender from birth by the chromosomes of the hypothalamus of the brain, which is the only scientifically known and proven part of the brain that establishes & controls all emotional states and sexual desires within a human being for another, which is the hidden core of a persons sexuality.
Different Sexual States.
SEXUAL ATTRACTION; (Inherent)
Sexual Attraction is confined only as the emotional and sexual natural drive of the inherent connection of a person to another sex-(M/F). On which emotionally activates a sensitive psychological & physiological connection, on a need to make physical and or verbal contact for the purpose of a binding psychological & physiological beneficial need of an intimate state with another person, permanently or temporarily with attachment to sexual relations "and or” commitment.
Sexual Attraction is the physiologically active part of a persons inherent connection, which "will not" manifest itself towards "any other person" of which there is "not" a naturally inherent driven connection. (E.g.; A Heterosexual male will only be "sexually attracted" by his inherently driven connection of Heterosexuality to the opposite sex and not the same sex)
SEXUAL AROUSAL; Sexual Arousal does not always or necessarily need sexual attraction to manifest itself, as arousal manifests itself in many forms. Any person will become aroused by hormones which is a natural chemical in a persons system without the need to be in the vicinity of any other individual, or even other external & visual sexual influences. Most people can wake up in the morning naturally aroused without thinking of sex. And also a person can use arousal to relieve sexual tension (Masturbation) with or without being sexually oppressed. It is very common for persons who are sexually oppressed to also use arousal for physical sexual relations purposes with other persons they are not even sexually attracted too, "even if" normally inherently connected to that particular sex-(M/F) but only for the purpose of sexual gratification. (E.g.; A sexually oppressed Heterosexual male with the need for sex, that "can not" find his personal preferred type of female but finds a woman that he is not sexually attracted too, and allows himself to act on and receive sexual gratification, or experiment's to see if that type of female or person appeals because of either server sexual oppression "or" psychological interest of a difference of sexual conduct or practises by experimentation)
SEXUAL LUST; Sexual lust can manifest itself through many forms but it is mainly "either" a form of psychological infatuation of another person over sex through sexual attraction, or an extremely strong temporary sexual arousal "with or without" sexual attraction over oppressed sexual needs, with very little outlet to express or find another gender (M/F) to relieve such sexual tensions.
SEXUAL DESIRE; Sexual desire is not much different from sexual lust but it is mainly the predominant or temporary psychological over-interest of thought by way of imagination grown from sexual arousal or attraction towards another sex-(M/F) "or" a form of interest, in untried sexual conduct or practises based on the thought of experimentation.
FORNICATION; Fornication can be a plethora of sexual activity's, but fornication is mainly about physical sexual pleasure with or without any form of intercourse or intimacy and intercourse is self explanatory for whatever sexuality.
RAPE / RAPISTS; Rape is an immoral act or attempt whatever sexuality, and all self acknowledged sexuality's (Heterosexuals & Homosexuals) see rape as the same illegal standing to each other. The act of rape about power and control and not based on physical relief, and can be by whatever form of sexual activity that can only be classed as such if it is between two or more persons. Rape is where one or more person is unwilling or un-consented to a sexual activity and are forced too, either physically or by psychologically manipulated to receive and endure sexual fornication against their will. An attempt of rape is were the unwilling party rejects such activity by whatever means and does not wish to participate. This does not mean the aggressor's are not rapists because the act did not take place, because the act was attempted showing their intentions.
[These are simple grounds of human psychological and physiological needs & wants. So bare these in mind as you read this brief as it will constantly bring you back to understanding what sexuality capable off and its confined limitations.]
Sexual attraction is a main direct expression of that inherent connection, and a person cannot be sexually attracted to any person, that they are not inherently connected too, or who fits to their visual personal preference, as everyone has their particular type of person they are sexually attracted too visually by sight. For example: Heterosexual men are only attracted to particular types of females ("but not all females!”) and they will not be sexually attracted to any woman that does not fit their personally preferred types.
If a Heterosexual man pushes himself in the direction of woman that he is not sexually attracted too, any sexually physical outcome will only be based on the temporary arousal or lust if and when it manifests itself simultaneously between both parties for that man and woman to achieve any form of sexual gratification, which is usually either based on sexual oppression, sexual desperation through unavailable personal preference types, or experimentation based on the interest trying different things. The inherent connection of sexuality will naturally disallow any “want” or “emotionally motivated sexual need”, or to fall eternally in love with any individual they are not sexually attracted to that does not fill their personal preference type regardless of being inherently connected to that particular gender.
Thus separating the intrinsic inherent physiology from any behavioural needs, showing the inherent connection is what makes sexuality, and not the behaviour of sexual choices that acted on it, which constitutes an obvious and irrefutable drawn line between the two. Many believe other sexualities are a ‘life choice’ and as many of the accused refute this accusation, others believe they themselves made such a life choice without separating that inherent physiological connection, from physical needs. Although it is a fact that not one recorded scientific institution, religion or government globally has ever come close to the correct conclusions to produced material to separate the two.
A Necessary Distinction
The following findings were based on the results of a 300-person response to an anonymous questionnaire produced and conducted by B-F-P in June-July 2002 on the LGBT community social scene, to obtain the publics personal view of sexuality in relation to their personal understanding of their own, and in relation to research of national and international political and entertainment media & public views and expression of the issue of Homosexuality on working out the exactly what those views actually mean, whether from bias & prejudice society or from supporting Heterosexuals and all the LGBT community media, conducted in 2001.
If any truth lay on there being three true sexuality's Heterosexual, Homosexual & Bisexual. It would be human arrogance to believe that only one specific sexuality is inherent and the other two sexuality's are experimented and then fixed and believing the first to more superior. But there is a majority of people who believe they themselves made such a directional life choice to be that way and believe that “no” sexuality is inherently fixed from birth.
To understand a genuine flaw in these experimentation and life choice presumptions, please read the following distinctions and psychology on the following perceived, believed and refuted sexualities.
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meanings of; Sexuality: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of a particular gender.
Name: All who go under that name; a family, a clan, individual, people, minority, or race; within the meanings or the terms of the name. (Also applies to inanimate objects)
B-F-P distinctions on all sexualities that many refute & believe
("If" there are three true inherent sexuality's, these are their distinctions)
[The following distinctions below have been constructed from in-depth B-F-P research and a 300 person survey on the London LGBT social scene to cover many different beliefs which do differ, but it is still important to understand those other beliefs as well your own.]
Heterosexuality: An unchangeable inherent connection from birth, to find a permanent state of eternal monogamous love towards ‘only’ persons of the opposite sex.
[The name Heterosexual is the abbreviation of Heterosexuality, to mean the individual person]
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meaning
Heterosexual: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of the opposite sex.
Equal to the official meanings of Bisexual and Homosexual, as it only carries inherent and immutable characteristics and no characteristics of behaviour that acts on those inherent characteristics.
[The largest percent Heterosexuals in society believe and state that this is what makes them Heterosexual, however there are many who do not believe in the existence of such a nature that is “only” driven towards the opposite sex from birth]
Some people reading this who call themselves Homosexuals, may possibly feel confused, believe it or not, Bisexuality is more complicated than anyone might think or has even been revealed before.
Bisexuality: Bisexuality is a variable physiology of an unbalanced inherent connection from birth to find a permanent state of eternal monogamous love towards persons of both genders.
But!
The birth state of the inherent connection is not always equally balanced, as many Bisexuals are born with a more predominantly driven inherent connection to one gender-(M/F) more than the other.
[This is from birth, and the inherent connection is identifiable at the earliest ages of childhood in all people regardless of sexuality. A child will personally identify a close connection to the gender he or she is driven to by sight, before any forms of sexual needs or aspirations are ever felt. As with any sexuality the nature of understanding sexual needs is only experienced after adolescence and through maturity where a person becomes more self-aware through the growth of knowledge on sexual experience and needs.]
But because of the unbalanced nature, Bisexuals will become to understand which of the genders he or she is more predominant driven towards for more pleasurable sexual relations in relation to the most predominantly driven connection, over the psychological measuring of sexual needs. Which can leave them later in life ‘to believe’ that their sexuality was experimented and then became permanent or a choice at puberty, and this leaves many to believe their sexuality was not naturally set from birth. There are Bisexuals more or less equally balanced from birth and at youth can or will base their first sexual experience or most enjoyed and preferred experience with a particular ‘gender-(M/F) and never explore the other as many unbalanced Bisexuals do. But they will still have a natural drive for both genders-(M/F), as the desire for the ‘preferred’ gender will be the most influential. This can or will make the inherent connection for the other gender-(M/F) less desirable, and almost unnoticeable and for many ‘nonexistent’ but not eradicated or a miss-understandable avenue of sexuality.
(For Example*: A boy in his youth before any form of sexual experience in life, feels emotionally & inherently connected to both genders, but is predominantly driven to one gender more than the other. Later in life after sexual experience, he becomes to understand that predominantly driven connection and does not consciously continue towards the other gender, or feel any need to explore the gender again or pursue it further.)
It is rare but later in life a Bisexual sexual attraction can ‘sometimes’ vary, and may start re-exploring the other gender-(M/F) by whatever unlimited possibilities. For example: through sexual experiences or lengthy periods of time surrounded by people of the other gender (M/F) creating psychological intimacy. However, when it comes to falling in love with either gender-(M/F), it will only be by whatever attraction to one gender-(M/F) that comes first, and never both simultaneously.
Bisexuality is extremely complicated but it is explainable by a differential gradient in an individual’s inherent connection from birth, based on what is above or below 50% on a particular gender [For example: Opposite sex 1% and Same sex at 99%]. The more or less equally balanced Bisexuals are around a 50-50% gradient, but it can all be brought down to three basic levels.
• Opposite sex-Bisexuality: Inherently & predominantly driven from birth by 60 – 95% towards the opposite sex more that the same sex, with or without sexual experiences or relationships of the same sex through adolescence into maturity. Making the inherent drive for the same sex extremely vague but not misunderstood. Many opposite sex driven Bisexuals not only believe they are Heterosexuals, but believe this is what makes Heterosexuality if you do not veer towards the same sex.
• Bisexuality: More or less equally balanced inherent connection towards both genders, but sexually they will find more pleasurable sexual experiences with one gender (M/F) more than the other sex (M/F).
• Same sex-Bisexuality: Inherently & predominantly driven from birth by 60 – 95% towards the same sex more that the opposite sex, with or without sexual experiences or relationships of the opposite sex through adolescence into maturity. Making the inherent drive for the opposite sex extremely vague but not misunderstood. Many same sex driven Bisexuals not only believe they are Homosexuals, but believe this is what makes Homosexuality if you do not veer towards the opposite sex.
Because of the international social stigma that Homosexuality is a choice, Bisexuals of every level, personally believe Homosexuality and Heterosexuality is a life choice, by either taking a well socially accepted and legally supported left turn in the road of life, or taking the unsupported right turn (metaphorically speaking). Although opposite sex driven and same sex driven Bisexuals believe sexuality is a choice, if one was to ask either of them the question: Can you give up and ignore that gender you are predominantly driven towards for the rest of your life, and concentrate solely on the other gender they are driven less towards. You will find that the only answer they could give, is no! But if was a optional life choice as they blindly believe, they should be more than capable of it. But social conditioning stops Bisexuals from realising you cannot make a choice on a fixed differential that was already naturally integrated, regardless of sexual needs or its unbalanced nature.
B-F-P has found through its survey that the Bisexuals, regardless of which gradient drive they are, would argue against and disbelieve without question the existence of any sexuality that has an inherent connection to only “one” gender from birth. Which is just a belief, and an unjustified one at that.
The “name” Bisexual is the abbreviation of Bisexuality, to mean the individual person.
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meaning
Bisexual: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of both sexes.
Equal to the official meanings of Heterosexual and Homosexual, as it only carries inherent and immutable characteristics and no characteristics of behaviour that act’s on those inherent characteristics.
[However the largest percent Heterosexual society do not believe in the existence of such a nature that is inherently connected towards both sexes either from birth or anytime in life]
_____________________________________
Homosexual: An unchangeable inherent connection from birth, to find a permanent state of eternal monogamous love towards ‘only’ persons of the same sex.
The “name” Homosexual is the abbreviation of Homosexuality, to mean the individual person.
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meaning
Homosexual: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of the same sex.
Equal to the official meanings of Heterosexual and Bisexual, as it only carries inherent and immutable characteristics and no characteristics of behaviour that act’s on those inherent characteristics.
[The largest percent Homosexuals believe and state that this is what makes them Homosexuals, however the largest percent of Heterosexual society and all Bisexuals do not believe in the existence of such a nature that is “only” driven towards the same sex from birth with no connection to the opposite sex. Which leaves all Bisexuals and Heterosexuals, whether they believe its wrong or ok to be that way, to directly socially and politically victimising and discriminating against Homosexuals who state and believe this their nature]
No one has ever made any in-depth distinction on sexuality especially Bisexuality like this before and this material is based on genuine sociology and psychology research done by B-F-P conducted in 2002. Even though prejudice Heterosexual’s accuse Homosexuals of a life-choice to be that way. Bisexuals have absolutely no idea what that means in relation these first and last distinctions but it is this inherent connection that makes sexuality, which is not visual state of being not the sexual behaviour that acted on it.
(b) What exactly is the sexuality that bias Heterosexual society, government, church, religious ministry & prejudice person accuses Homosexuals of?
A Life Choice vice of deviant sexual behaviour by Heterosexuals
Homosexuals are condemned by religion on the basis that people believe the Bible teaches them that Homosexuals are Heterosexuals that have chosen a life long vice of sexual behaviour towards persons of the same sex. This would mean that they are incapable of any true emotional feeling for each other, as a Heterosexual would for the opposite sex, as any true emotional connection, would only be inherently towards persons of the opposite sex, and they would logically be Heterosexual by their natural attraction through an inherent connection to the opposite sex. Every true Homosexual, not only categorically denies this, but believes, states, demonstrate and campaign for civil rights & laws on the pretext that they are born that way to only feel inherently connected to persons of the same sex and not the opposite sex and say that is what makes them Homosexuals. They not only believe nothing else, but no self acknowledged Homosexuals have "ever" admitted to calling themselves Heterosexuals that look for sex with persons of the same sex, and are only capable of natural affection to the opposite sex by any inherent connection.
SELF-ADMITTED, HETEROSEXUAL MEN WHO HAVE HAD SEX WITH MEN
It is well documented of Heterosexual men who admit to only being Heterosexual and have had sex with other Heterosexual men or Homosexual men. The human condition of sexual oppression is very well founded with human sexuality, and Heterosexual men have been well known to look for sexual arousal in many ways. But sex between self-admitted "Heterosexual men" themselves has always been under confined conditions where they have found a way to release severe sexual pressures, In the past, e.g.; Prisons, Slavery, Army Camps & Military Institutions. And also at present day it is still well known in military institutions and prisons. But it has also been very well documented, that some men in long-term married relationships that are no longer sexually active with their spouse have been found to be "experimenting" with other types of persons to relieve such sexual tensions based on the adrenaline rush of arousal and lustful needs over sexual expression in trying different outlets. This has only been recorded as experimentation or rape, as there is no emotional reciprocation of any kind, because Heterosexuals within the confines of inherent attraction are only emotionally receptive to the opposite sex, and this has only been recorded as just a way of relieving severe sexually oppressed needs with physical ways that are “technically and morally against their inherent nature”.
Any sex between "admitted" Heterosexual men that have had sex with other men, has only ever been recorded to be either rape or temporary lust for sexual gratification & relief by experimentation, and "never" any form of emotional reciprocation or anything permanent, lifelong or committed. These men did not call themselves Homosexuals and said they felt no need too, but did call it a Homosexual act.
Some may feel there is an illogical flaw in this brief's writing, between the states of sexual needs and the life choice theory & self admitted Heterosexual men, this is expected, but there is no flaw.
Chapter 3,
What Really Is This Life Choice To Be That Way
(a) A True Logical Interpretation Of The Life Choice To Be That Way Theory.
Logically if a person "takes on" a permanent life choice of Homosexuality such as how prejudice Heterosexuals describe; that person would have to be something else first and logically the opposite to Homosexual, is Heterosexual. So technically and logically, they are teaching, preaching, stating and conditioning people to believe, that every Homosexual as an entire people world-wide in every so-called civilised country, and indirectly connected, and enough of them to populate a small country of their own, are actually Heterosexuals that have decided to take on a permanent life choice vice of sexual practising behaviour based on arousal & lust after experimentation "with persons that they will be mentally "incapable" of having any form of deep natural emotional, sensitive and physiological & psychological attachments for the "need" for physical contact, based on a human driven attraction by naturally inherent connection to another gender-(M/F).
Which logically eradicates sexual attraction from the issue as sexual attraction is only bound by an inherent connection and since behaviour does not make sexuality, and Homosexuals can only go with Homosexuals and life choice theory cuts out attraction or sexual attraction by inherent connection as it is only bound to inherent sexuality leaving only behaviour through temporary arousal and lust over and after experimentation from sexual oppression. How would either “Hetero-Homosexual” come to the conclusion of wanting to have permanent life of sex with each other and spend there lives together doing so, as any sex without any form of intimate connection or attraction, would logically only be sexual gratification by arousal if and when it manifests itself, and if it happens between the two persons simultaneously to achieve such gratification. This would mean there would be a permanent negative purpose of and for both persons towards each other for them to have actually seen any permanent life long need to live with each other that way, which intern works against their perceived inherent natural drive of Heterosexuality. Because they would be, by choice, permanently psychologically oppressing themselves from having any form of naturally beneficial emotional feelings of a necessary inherent intimate connection to base any form of partnership or relationship on such a permanent life choice to be that way. Meaning that an entire community of people's distinction worldwide on the purpose of being alive would be a pointless waist of existence. And no human being on the planet is capable of a permanent life long vice of sex "permanently acting against" their sexuality & natural sexual drive and inherent need for intimate connection.
E.g. The life choice of Heterosexuality, 1) Two Heterosexual opposites (man and woman) who are not filling any personal preferences to the opposite sex meaning they are not even sexual attracted to each other, base their existence solely on a rare temporary arousal which logically would only be produced from experimentation, server sexual oppression, or isolation from the opposite sex personal preferences, want to spend the rest of their lives together and wanting marriage and adoption laws, where Heterosexuals are incapable of “willingly” attempting a personally unfulfilling pointless lifelong committed choice to the opposite sex, let alone the same sex.
The life choice theory of Homosexuality, 2) Two genuine Heterosexual men want to spend the rest of their lives together and wanting marriage and adoption laws, even though they are neither inherently connected to each other meaning they will never even achieve any form of sexual attraction, and basing this existence solely on a rare temporary arousal which logically would only be produced from experimentation, server sexual oppression, or isolation from the opposite sex. In an existence where Heterosexuals are incapable of “willingly” achieving a personally unfulfilling pointless lifelong committed choice to the opposite sex, let alone the same sex.
3) "If Homosexuality is not a choice"; A Homosexual male spending the rest of his life having sex with a woman, even though he is not inherently connected to the opposite sex to achieve any sexual attraction for her or feels anything more than mutual friendship for her, to even be aroused without having to covering his eyes over server sexual oppression.
The connotations and implications work both ways and the connotations and implications of what every prejudice Heterosexual believes in on this subject and scale are Insane. If Homosexuality is a true sexuality and a Heterosexual has consented sex with a person of the same sex, it does not make him or her a Homosexual and it should not be classed as a Homosexual act and "vice versa!". It should be classed either way as going against ones own inherent nature and nothing more.
(b) Peoples Perspective: Anyone, whatever way they are inclined can make the conscious choice on the consenting person they choose have sex with. But it is "mentally impossible" for any human being on the planet to make the conscious choice of true love on the one of which they fall in love. That is natural, and if it's natural it's right and that is not an assumption. Every human being has a naturally born inherent connection of which they are inherently & emotionally driven towards by another gender-(M/F), whether or not they are sexually active, from "or at" any age." As this being an absolute fact, how does any person, priest & ministries come to the conclusion that Homosexuality is a life long commitment of sex with people they feel absolutely nothing for apart from temporary lust and arousal if and when it manifest it self make any sense. Has anyone looked at the issue logically, do you feel these words contradict what you already believe? Are you reading this brief objectively or from a single-minded point of view?
[Most people will automatically believe they are looking at all things objectively and logically but will never realise they are doing the complete opposite.] Any assumption of any morality issue personally concluded by a psychological perspective is only a personal assumption based on how you understand and identify what you are only capable of and know by the knowledge of your life experience and your own nature…
Does that feel strange?..
If Homosexuality is a true sexuality of its own, then it would means it is a nature that is the complete opposite to the nature of Heterosexuality and has no relevance to the nature of Bisexuality. So logically a Heterosexual or Bisexual looking at the issue from the point of view of his or her nature of Heterosexuality or Bisexuality, would it not be irrelevant to the subject when confronted with the issue of Homosexuality. Would one not logically look past they're own nature to assume or surmise other possible conclusions of an inherent connection and monogamous love or just judge it by the nature of Heterosexuality or Bisexuality, which logically, is irrelevant to what “most” Homosexuals say they are.
Are Bisexuals & Heterosexuals only looking at the issue from a single-minded point of view based only on their own nature that is irrelevant to what Homosexuals say they are, because what Homosexuals say they are as a nature, is the completely opposite to Heterosexuality and irrelevant to Bisexuality because they are connected to both sexes-(M/F). Is this a possible cause for the misconceptions and assumptions made over the Bible to give discrimination to a worldwide minority.
Does this suggest, or possibly explain the social stigma why people believe there is "No Moral Equivalence" and create natural hate regardless of religion as well as the assumptions made over the Bible to create a conditioning of prejudice on the subject. The only way to be sure is to truly understand how people look and judge others by natural perception.
Because if Bisexuals & Heterosexuals are only looking on the issue from there perspective of their own nature. They are not in any way whatsoever looking at any part of the issue objectively or logically in any true form, and intern misinterpreting a reality of things by looking at it from a single-minded point of view and nothing else. The only way to understand any truth is to look at any issue objectively from every logical and conceivable angle to obtain the facts. When a religious person knows the Bible states and explains, only the absolute truth will be Gods Judgement, shouldn't any religious person look at the subject objectively, to be absolutely sure of the truth instead of relying on what other people preach. Or is it what other people preach just confirming that single-minded point of view and naturally making a person think it is the truth by confirming natural perception, and disbelieving without question anything else. Have any Heterosexual (religious or not) ever done that on this issue?
It is a fact that the life choice theory against Homosexual’s is not just confined to religious people, as agnostics and Atheists believe exactly the same life choice theory. Why since they have no knowledge of what the Bible states on the issue for any form of personal confirmation to agree, so why do they believe exactly the same theory that it is a life choice to be that way.
Knowing that the life choice theory is not just confined to people who’s beliefs are created by religious teachings, B-F-P went to specialist psychoanalysts to get 2nd and 3rd professional opinions on the possibility of B-F-P questions within the context of B-F-P’s research, and found,
A simple mental barrier that every human being has…
Chapter 4,
The International Core Of The Problem Causing The Entire Debate.
[Professional Psychological research by B-F-P and analysis on human perception, with the help of professional and expert second and third opinions with psychobabble edited out.]
Most people will not believe anything further than what they see with their own eyes. Behaviour does not make sexuality and beyond behaviour any individual's sexuality "is not a visual state of being" like skin colour is, whether Heterosexual, Bisexual or Homosexual. Any person will make a perspective look on others by their own knowledge and experience of their lives on how they know what they are capable of within themselves as a person and within their own nature that they identify on, to make correct assumptions and judgements.
For example; Every person will subconsciously remember all passed experiences in life, even from childhood to know how they would relate to future circumstances on making the correct conscious actions & judgements by assumption or conclusion on others in relation to themselves. In term of "this" morality issue of Homosexuality, any Bisexual or Heterosexual will always subconsciously or consciously conclude the nearest logical psychological denominator of which they could, would, should or might possibly be capable of themselves, on which they naturally identify within their own inherent nature. Anything that is "not possible" within that persons inherent nature will be consciously distinguished "as alien" to their morality, and conclude the only logical denominator of possibility that they could, would, should or might be capable of.
From the perspective of “same sex driven” Bisexuals 80–95% connected to the same sex
It exactly same with a Bisexuals view of Homosexuality and Heterosexuality, as since behaviour is a choice and eternal monogamous love isn’t, and Bisexuals are inherently connected to both sexes from birth, and only understand the knowledge of their self-evident sexuality throughout their entire natural life, and do not naturally identify any inherent connection to only one gender-(M/F), leaving them to personally believe and refute that neither Homosexuality nor Heterosexuality are fixed sexuality's from birth towards only “one” sex, regardless however much the level of their inherent connection differs in Bisexuality.
As any form of such a prospect of only being connected to one sex would be an alien concept in relation to their nature. Creating a mental block in perceiving every person around them to be the same, and leaving them to believe the global human population is born with a natural drive towards both sexes that differs after adolescence & maturity to be drawn to one sex more than the other, to create what they believe to be Homosexuality or Heterosexuality by the difference of an optional choice of natural drive in one direction or the other, and believe a Bisexual to be a person who is more or less “equally” driven towards both sexes.
Also, because of the international driven social stigma by prejudice genuine Heterosexuals; that Homosexuality is a life choice to be that way, the largest percent of Bisexuals through adolescence into maturity come to understand the predominant drive for one sex more than the other, will grow up into adulthood believing that dominant drive to be the life choice they made, and basing the belief on the issue of sexual needs over being more drawn to one more than both sexes because of more enjoyed sexual and emotional feelings towards that preferred gender-(M/F) without even realising that that was actually a naturally driven inherent nature that achieved that apocalypse. The reason Bisexuals do not understand this is because explaining the inherent connection of human sexuality to another person is very hard, let alone themselves regardless of sexual needs, and since behaviour does not make sexuality and human sexuality is not a visual state of being, and no official sources have ever produced any materials for explaining it to anyone to understand it properly. Every person of any sexuality is left with no external information or choice but to judge others in relation to themselves on the issue of sexual needs.
It is exactly the same with Homosexuals, because you will find that "most Homosexuals" personally believe and feel that all Heterosexuals must be partly Homosexual, even though as far as they know within their own nature, they are mentally incapable of becoming sexually, intimately, emotionally and monogamously involved by any form of inherent connection or sexual attraction towards any person of the opposite sex, without realising the psychologically perceived contradiction to the reality of things.
No promoted material has ever been shown to contradict that understanding, of which is stopping them from looking past that perception, and if a Heterosexual or Homosexual questions that Bisexuals belief or knowledge of sexuality that Bisexual will disbelieve without question anything that does not identify with his or her nature, and will still believe the Life Choice theory without feeling the need to question it, even though it is impossible for any Bisexual to make any form of directional choice of sexuality, because you cannot make a choice on a direction from two options that were already naturally integrated, because of an inherently fixed unbalanced gradient. Many Bisexuals that believe they are now only Homosexual’s, and never contemplate calling themselves or believe themselves to be a Bisexual, and would disbelieve any verbally told, or show written inherent natural distinctions of Homosexuality or Heterosexuality with an inherent connection to only one sex. Unfortunately, these Bisexuals that believe they are Homosexuals and work in any form of entertainment media or civil rights groups as leaders that promote that expression based solely on their own belief of sexuality, will not realise that they are actually directly discriminating against Homosexuals & Heterosexuals of which not only do not identify with that belief but find such a belief that sexuality is not only a choice but pushing a presupposition that everyone chooses a preference to be that way, are completely discriminatory, harassing & dehumanising.
From the perspective of genuine Heterosexuality from birth.
Since behaviour is a choice, and eternal monogamous love isn’t and Heterosexuals are mentally incapable of such love or even sexual attraction for persons of the same sex to even come psychologically close to identifying it within their own inherent nature, they will always consciously or subconsciously conclude the nearest logical and natural denominator of which they could, would, should or might be capable of that is not part of their inherent nature, as whatever is inherent is from birth, anything else is acquired, meaning a choice. What they are not capable of inherently will only be seen as a choice, and on this issue a sexual choice, not a choice of love through an inherent connection to the same sex, as it is ultimately impossible for Heterosexuals. Leaving Heterosexual to feel no need to explore it further to realise, Heterosexual opposites where there are no personal preferences of type to achieve even any form of sexual attraction for each other, are incapable of “willingly” achieving any lifelong committed choice of existence with each other, based solely on a rare temporary arousal if and when it manifests between man and woman simultaneously to achieve any form of sexual gratification to the opposite sex, let alone the same sex.
The international religious stigma of Homosexuality being a life choice to be that way, will only be the biggest form of confirmation on any bias Heterosexual's assumption by perception based on Heterosexual nature on the issue. With this personally confirmed stigma, 100% of the average bias Heterosexual’s preconception ideals of Homosexuality will automatically be the disgusted thought of anal sex and see nothing less and nothing more. And with such a religious confirmation on a person’s own personal man made assumptions and construing it as religious belief will make them incapable and unwilling to accept any other plausible possibility, even if Homosexuality was proved 100% genetically to be fact, because one can not negate the fact that every religious person will believe that the beliefs of the many out-way the beliefs of the few;-How could the belief of the global populous be wrong? Provoking a conflict solely based on the unproven evident-less personal beliefs of prejudice individuals the larger majority who use the Bible as their foundation of (void) evidence to blanket dehumanisation and death on a minority of human beings, saying the Bible is the truth, even though the Bible actually explains to look for truth in the reality of things pertaining to this life. But every prejudice Heterosexual of every religion based on the Bible, interprets the Bible literally word for word without realising that 50 to 60% of the Bible is written in analogies and metaphors, and then they use all the sections that explain Heterosexuals should not acted against their nature with sexual needs which is punishable by death as a the founding basis of their belief on Homosexuality. Even though there is not one version of the entire Bible worldwide that carries one recorded word, sentence, parable, gospel or story on any person who actually did sexually act against their nature, that explains they ever made any form of permanent life long committed choice against their nature to that sexual act. B-F-P completely agree that a Heterosexual should not go against their nature with anything, as there would be no personally achievable natural or moral future in it; which is obviously why those sections in the Bible were written to point out.
Regardless how many bias Heterosexuals without evidence disbelieve without question what Homosexuals say they are; when a minority of human beings have been stating and campaigning for endless decades on social & human rights and legal issues like marriage, joint co-habitation rights, joint pensions, inheritance, insurances, adoption, surrogacy, schooling curriculum’s on same-sex marital love and relationships, immigration & refugee asylum protection from execution. Protection from global dehumanisation through discrimination, victimisation, harassment resulting to the degradation of mental health and European human rights court status as an inherent dignity to simply legally support an obviously opposite nature that Heterosexuals are incapable of achieving, even by choice, constitutes and qualifies an irrefutable drawn line between what the Bible states in relation to the nature of Heterosexuality, and what Homosexuals are as a minority of human beings? It is not a one-way single-minded bias perception; it is a subject just like most things that works both ways.
With this mental barrier a Bisexual would never realise a simple equation on the subject of genuine sexuality, which would help one open up and identify that mental barrier. Which is: From the Bisexual perception, “if” a Heterosexual is a person who has the same inherent connection to both sexes from childhood, but is up to 95% driven towards the opposite sex, which same sex driven Bisexuals would understand after adolescence and maturity, meaning a opposite sex driven Bisexual would still completely understand the natural drive for the same sex regardless how small that connection to the same sex is: So why is it that every bias and prejudice Heterosexual regardless of religion or politics always states that; It is abnormal, unnatural and there is no moral equivalence between Homosexuality & Heterosexuality, and demand 100% genetic proof to be inherent.
This mental barrier is not a delusional state or any form of psychological dysfunction, it is an element of self-conditioned growth of IQ in how a person tries to objectively and logically perceives others by judgement in relation to themselves. Based on what they are familiar with or used to or know by past knowledge and natural life experience. Although any person that does this, will not realise they are judging an entire people and minority by the vanity of their own self-evident nature, instead of objectively and logically seeing or believing the other persons or peoples stated and demonstrated self-evident & obvious nature. Which logically Homosexuality would be the complete and total opposite nature to Heterosexuality, so to base any judgement in relation to Heterosexuality by a Heterosexual, would be irrelevant.
The disgust of lesbianism is very small because the largest percent of Heterosexual men are sexually aroused by the idea of two women together sexually, which is what creates the international media hypocrisy and fascism and shows the single-minded point of view of Heterosexual men. Whether Homosexuality is a true sexuality, or not, what Homosexuals and civil right groups states, campaigns and demonstrates they are, is a complete opposite nature to Heterosexuality, making such subject matter irrelevant to the view of Heterosexual opposite sex attraction. So the prospect of any Bisexual or Heterosexual judging Homosexuality should look at the issue objectively but very few do, and that's why most people believe in the life choice theory whether they believe its wrong or write to make such life choice to be that way. And why nobody has realised, that if one was to take an intelligent logical look at the life choice theory itself, it would never make any logical sense in relation to the confines of human sexuality or the confined nature of Heterosexuality. For decades bias Politicians and religious persons have tried to explain Homosexuality to be Heterosexuals with a confused emotional sexual need for the same sex.
But in relation to the genuine Heterosexual perspective, "If" all Homosexuals & Bisexuals actually were Heterosexuals, it would be completely logical to assume it to be a confused sexually driven emotional state for the same sex. But, There's a missing link to that hypothesis that has never been objectively or logically surmised. [:-What ever is possible has a likely standpoint to be proved impossible, but whatever has been proved “not impossible”, has the most plausible standpoint to be the most likely truth and fact.] The inherent connection of Heterosexuality or Bisexuality to the opposite sex is something you cannot remove, you cannot turn it off, or simply eradicate it, or even ignore it, or work against it, even if a Bisexual is 95% driven towards the same sex. So if Homosexuality is a conditioning or choice, it doesn't explain in anyway whatsoever why every genuine Homosexual worldwide in every so-called civilised country and indirectly connected, explain, demonstrate and state they never have been, and never will be capable of feeling for or falling in love with any person of the opposite, sex which is something completely and ultimately impossible for a Heterosexual or Bisexual to achieve, even by choice.
Leaving the question: Is it “Impossible” some people are born inherently different to others?
No psychological manipulation or circumstance in life could ever possibly make an entire worldwide minority of Heterosexuals or Bisexuals incapable of being inherently connected to the opposite sex to achieve any state of mind that does not understand what it must feel like to be inherently connected to the opposite sex to know that one might or might mot fall in love that way. So why believe it is a choice?
By the life choice "theory", which all bias Heterosexuals & Bisexual believe in, completely supports this insane theory, that makes Heterosexuality as a genuine naturally inherent sexuality to “only” the opposite sex and Bisexuality to both sexes to be completely unnatural flawed & corruptible. But yet, you will not find one Heterosexual that believes the nature of Heterosexuality is corruptible, and the reason why is because their right, it isn't. But they will still blindly believe the life choice theory without question or even feeling the need to examine it. If a person that judges others by their own nature, is incapable of personally identifying something that is naturally alien to them, they will come to the nearest natural logical denominator based any conclusions on their self-evident knowledge of their nature, and will never naturally feel any need to look past the first conclusion based on that nature. And in doing so, their mind will never objectively offer any other personal self evident logical questions, to further surmise any other conclusions.
The only way for a person to allow them self to get past the first conclusion, is for that conclusion to be logically and identifiably contradicted, which will open & identify that mental barrier. Unfortunately no material exists to achieve that. If there was, once identified the mind will naturally offer itself other objective logical questions of possibilities, to surmise other theories and conclusions. If any bias Heterosexual or Bisexual that believes in the life choice theory were to think logically about other possibilities of Homosexuality, they would have asked themselves the most simplest, plausible logical questions. Because without looking at any subject matter and judging it in relation to oneself knowing this single-minded perception, you would realise that you not only have absolutely no external information whatsoever to base any form of genuine conclusion on the absolute truth, no physical scientific evidence or proof exists to justify such beliefs. Which intern, if realised, it would leave one with no choice but to look for the truth and not perceive it.
Unless that person finds it easier to base their truth on perception, because looking for the truth is harder and contradicts popular belief, which intern, induces and conditions common misconceptions and stigmas which institutes discrimination and victimisation through national dehumanisation to such a depth that very few could possibly fathom the consequences, even to the point of irreversibility. Has anyone realised a mind-boggling fact that exists, that there is not and never has been one scientific institution in the history of the planet that ever proved Homosexuality was a choice in the first place to confirm such beliefs, leaving a simple: where do these beliefs come from, considering they are not confined to people who understand and believe religious teachings. A person will not blindly disbelieve the issue if it involves a close person, i.e.; family and friends or if it is explained to them through any teaching media. It is very well known that many parents disown and deliberately physically abuse their children because they cannot accept them for what they are. This is also contributed to by many fathers who refuse to believe that such a nature to feel only for the same sex could ever possibly be genetically and inherently born from them. And inducing the firm belief over pride against their own child of an unnatural affliction and believe their child is living a life of self-delusion over emotional & sexual needs, and will believe he knows more on the subject than his own child. This also explains the realistic persona of the hate, stigma and tolerance towards Homosexuals regardless of whether Homosexuality is a choice or not, and whether or not the aggressor is religious. It is a fact of life that anything inherently natural is from birth, and anything else just like Religion or any profound divine influence or behaviour, is acquired, meaning a choice.
This morality issue by Heterosexuals that don’t understand Homosexuality regardless of religion is a humanism perception, the same as Bisexuals prejudice views of hate because of their own prejudice single-minded view of Heterosexuality. Just like most things, prejudice and discrimination works both ways, and it is very likely that the 99.99% of the LGBT community actually have no true understanding of why every government religion & Heterosexual society works against them. It would never cross a Bisexual or Homosexual's mind that the prejudice minority of Heterosexual society believe Homosexuals are all Heterosexuals with an abnormal affliction for sexual needs with nothing to do with love. From a Homosexual’s point of view to assume such a prospect would be ludicrous and impossible for Heterosexual society to be that blindly deluded. Very few people in society hate purely for the sake of hating; prejudice and hate just like most things works both ways and will always have a personal reason, but will almost always be, a form of confirmation on a personal bias assumption, and if the largest percent of society states what you believe is right; does that necessarily mean you are?
Bias Heterosexual Politicians that write law and legislation based on the issue of LGBT community, will always write these legislations in the language of the Heterosexual perspective, and base it on that; this is the life choice theory language, making it hard for civil rights activists to realise the full implications that are written into legislations for law. Unless you know what language to look for in it’s writing that is based on the life choice theory, by people believing mankind is a totally Heterosexual race, where by some, have affliction of sexual needs to the same sex. Which explains why a bias Heterosexual state: It is abnormal, unnatural and there is no moral equivalence between Homosexuality & Heterosexuality, regardless of religion. There is no point fighting against prejudice & hate if you don’t understand why it's there. Unless you understand that reason and fight against that reason, you might as well bang you're head up against a brick wall as you’ll never win, because you can not fight fire with fire, you must find the core of the problem creating it to understand why it is burning.
Revealing the core of the problem to the entire international debate over the issue of Homosexuality is that between Heterosexuals, Bisexuals and Homosexuals, there is three separate distinctive natural perceptions, that from the perspective of one of these inherent natures, one will only see life from a complete different perspective than the others, and will only make decisions based on that perspective. Which explains why the largest percent of Heterosexual society believes Homosexuality is an unnatural choice of sex and not an inherent dignity or true sexuality. The same as Bisexuals will believe they are Homosexual and disbelieve that neither Homosexual or Heterosexuality are inherent sexualities to only one gender-(M/F). It also explains what is stopping the largest percent of the LGBT community from having any idea of the reason why society, religion and government will continually refuse and deny Homosexuals the desperately needed rights and laws they fight for. Though these perceptions demonstrates why many Homosexuals and Bisexuals are confused as to why there is such a diverse difference in natural attractions of gender, but are incapable of truly explaining it to themselves, and are only hypothesising on the reality of how things would, could, should or might be.
But this also creates a danger within civil right groups over the fight for civil rights, as many of these groups will also be saturated with same sex driven Bisexuals working at the top levels, and they will never realise the danger their ideals of reality on sexuality causes when bias Heterosexuals believe Homosexuality is a choice to act against them, and these Bisexuals will be confirming every bias perception of the opposition with every action that construes any political argument over sexuality as a Sexual preference (Which means: sexual behaviour towards a preferred gender), because these LGBT group leaders will naturally believe that everyone is inherently connected to both sexes. Leaving bias genuine Heterosexual politicians with a view of the LGBT community as a minority based on an optional existence to either live a moral way or to live an immoral legally restricted way, whether these Heterosexuals believe its wrong or OK to be that way. Any Homosexual or Bisexual reading this that knows or understands the reading of legislation will now find that if they read any legislation again they’ve known, it will read completely differently than it did before, regardless of years of experience, because this mental barrier of perception has a draw back of stopping you and diverting you from seeing the reality of things, even in written word. Written legislations by bias politicians will write law from that perspective only. When the EU court of Human Rights or any court of law or bias Politicians, judges or jury’s, will only see and understand and use law from that Heterosexual perspective when civil rights fight them for their rights, so to succeed in that, one must understand that perspective. Any teachers national unions that accept support from LGBT community advisory groups on education curriculum materials will also be looking at it from their own perspective. Because of the "social stigma" that Homosexuality is a life choice, many Bisexuals believe they have made such a life choice as they preferred the same sex, and believe they are a Homosexuals that were once a Heterosexuals and never believe they are Bisexuals. And in believing that, some religious same sex driven Bisexuals have been found to have now gone to special psychotherapy reversion to revert back to what they believe to be Heterosexuality. And in doing so, it has been known that such psychotherapy has successfully made them more preferable to the opposite sex, but also making them believe they are now Heterosexual again, when in fact they are not.
This therapy does not work on Heterosexuals or Homosexuals, as they inherently fixed sexuality's by an inherent connection to only "one sex" not two to perpetuate any differential, making such manipulative therapy impossible for many. Many religious Heterosexuals believe Homosexuality can be eradicated by such therapy because of this common misconception brought about by confused Bisexuals.
But if any religious person believed Homosexuality was not a choice in relation to this therapy they would be believing that an inherent sexuality to only one gender-(M/F) like Heterosexuality to be completely corruptible through mental manipulation. So many Bisexuals that called themselves Homosexuals that have been changed by such psychotherapy now call them Heterosexuals and ex-gays. Which has induced, indorsed and justified the religious and political belief that Homosexuality is life choice, even if science proved Homosexuality to be 100% genetically naturally inherent, and regardless that science never proved it was a choice in the first place to have any genuinely justified legal need to spend endless tax payers money on proving an existence of an already existing minority that Heterosexuals and Bisexuals are ultimately incapable of achieving even by choice. If the LGBT community and its rights groups are confusing themselves over what Homosexuality or sexuality is, then how do they ever expect Heterosexual society to understand what Homosexuality is to gain any form of civil laws to the fullest extent. It is fact that Heterosexual society has no true idea what Homosexuality actually is, and as it would seem, neither does the LGBT community public & lobby group leaders. In many cases national distinctions to justify inherent dignity can be discriminatory, but in this case, a distinction must be made!
National statistics like to speculate that 1 in every 10 people are gay, and since the UK population is around 62 million, that makes the LGBT community to be around 10%, meaning more or less around 6.2million. The belief systems of every minority has been so constitutionally integrated, is it irreversible?
Population Statistics On Genuine Natures And Statistics Of Bias Beliefs In Relation to Them
| LGBT minority 6.2 Million | (UK Population 62 Million) Opposite sex driven Bisexuals & Genuine Heterosexuals 56.Million|
[Same sex driven Bisexuals are saturating the civil rights system, and have been since the fight for equality began. But the fight for equality has been based on the premise of Bisexual belief, that the oppression is from a so-called Heterosexual society that chose to be straight and refuse civil rights on premise that Heterosexual sex is more superior because of a socially, legally, morally and religiously supported left turn in life instead of an immoral right turn. LGBT rights groups for the past forty years, because this belief, have been voicing that the oppression from Heterosexual society is a sexual apartheid; when the true fight for equality is a completely different ball game]
Many LGBT rights groups might argue against B-F-P on pushing an agenda against Bisexuals who believe they are Homosexuals as discriminatory to their personal beliefs to accept themselves as Bisexuals not Homosexuals and that the oppression is not a sexual apartheid. But this belief is equally as bias, prejudice and damaging to Homosexuals, as the Heterosexual belief over Homosexuality as a life choice of sex with nothing to do with characteristics of inherent dignity. Which LGBT civil rights groups feel justified in fighting against this bias Heterosexual belief system, even though this fight for equality is equally as discriminatory against Heterosexuals personal belief’s over others in believing it is a choice.
So to argue that its OK for one to fight to change the Heterosexual belief system, but wrong to fight against Bisexuals who believe they’re Homosexuals who create equally as much damage, would be unjustified colonial hypocrisy and fascism. The freedom of natural life of a human minority from physical and mental degradation through destructive dehumanisation, is fundamentally more important than any majority’s idealism’s, which one assumes the LGBT community have been fighting for rights based on that premise.
["Tolerance" is forced acknowledgement & acceptance without any true form of understanding, and the only way to truly understand anything, is to ask questions.]
Arthur Conan Doyle : Sherlock Holmes
Anything is possible until it is proven without a doubt to be impossible.
If you eliminate the “impossible”, you're left only with what ”is plausible".
Then by exploring the most possible, how ever improbable,
Will always reveal the truth.
The meaning of Philosophy;
1, The use of reason & argument in seeking truth and knowledge of reality; esp. of the causes and nature of things and of the principle's governing existence, the material universe, perception's of physical phenomena and human behaviour.
2, a) A system "or" set of beliefs, reached by this process.
[ Middle English from Old French filosofie via Latin Philosophia;-"Wisdom" from Greek (as Philosophos;- "Wise.").
Whether Homosexuality “is a choice, or not” every Church on the planet states; it is against God, Christ and the Bible to segregate who does and does not apply to being part of religion, the scriptures and God laws and under Christ, because to do so would contradict the founding principle of Biblical prophesy. Which Biblical prophesy means and explains that God, Christ, the Bible and the scriptures “is for everyone”, which mean “it is for everyone”. Otherwise through separatism, idealism, prejudice, hate and segregation of others, even if you segregate your self from others over ideals of self superiority; You make it meaningless!
But then every religion based on the Bible prejudicially segregates every man, woman and child of the global LGBT community from ever being morally part of "or" involved in any religious denomination based on the Bible, and then uses them as target of evil to condition the rest of the global prejudice individuals in society to load their moral separatist gun against, with an ammunition of personal preferences over an idealism based of self-superiority, and then conditions them to fire, calling it religious belief, Not Hate!
When looking for the obvious logical facts and truths on, does one necessarily need DNA and genetic research to prove 100% an obvious logical point or fact of nature?
The distinction above is the true factual meaning of philosophy, and if the worlds prejudice populous haven’t just simply judged the entire issue in relation to their natures over the past 2000 years, “what was it” that Heterosexuals, Bisexuals, the governments, global institutions, global society and every religion and churches theology, sophistry, doctrine’s and interpretations and beliefs based on that brought them to any form of conclusion that Homosexuality is a life choice of sexual needs to be that way?
What ever happened to common sense?
(b) Human Morality
Human morality is an inherent vain state of mind & feeling that every human being has, that help's a person psychologically define themselves as moral & humane irrelevant to religion. Which controls and determines a person's own belief of reality within the life growth of knowledge, experience and understanding of ones own life, confined by their-own natural humanity and nature. This determines the control of ones own beliefs on what is write and wrong, what is dangerous and safe, also how to distinguish between what is permanently mentally beneficial, "and" physical and material needs and wants, within the belief of objective actions, assumptions, conclusions and judgements on others in relation to themselves. By this humanism psychological perception defines how one sees how others should treat or protect others, whether good or bad in relation to themselves. When all these things are acted on, they determine and interpret the integrity, principles and the character of a person by their morality of thought…
The perception of others in relation to oneself has always been mankind’s greatest downfall. As 99.99% of mankind has a habit of perceiving the absolute worst in people, just over the small things like suspicion without the slightest proof or evidence and will also believe that what they believe, is 100% conclusive… Humanism: Whether it is a choice or not, the life choice theory is the founding perception that Heterosexuals believe in against Homosexuality regardless of religion to make any true distinction on the subject that leaves the conclusions that have been made in relation to the founding interpretation of the Bible. It is a humanism perception, which is the natural perception of others in relation to themselves on common moral human matters, regardless of religion.
The official meaning off, "HUMANISM"; 1a, An outlook or system of thought, concerned with human matters rather than or without religious, divine or supernatural perceptions.
2a A Personal theory, perception or outlook emphasizing common needs and seeking solely rational ways of solving human problems, and concerned with humankind as responsible and progressive intellectual beings.
Humanism means a natural state of mind about material perception of how a person draws personal conclusions and opinions on other people around them in relation to themselves based on the human morality of acceptable and common conduct of behaviour, actions, self & exterior preservational material matters. That interprets the integrity & character of themselves and others. Which is identical and goes hand in hand with the natural human characteristic called "human morality" which is an inherent state of mind that every human being on the planet has. Whether Homosexuality is a choice or not, it is this Humanism perception of Heterosexual bias without seeing the issue objectively, that is the founding cause of the Stigma, tolerance and the life choice to be that way theory with or without religion to guide it. The whole issue of Homosexuality through Government guided by religion against civil rights for Homosexuals has been on the belief that Homosexuality is an act, a practice, a life choice vice of sexual behaviour by innately born Heterosexuals. Everyone that condemns Homosexuals, believe it is a choice and feel justified by religion in their actions. Has anyone considered what damage they might be causing if they’re wrong. Whatever sexuality you are, can you divorce yourself from the subject, and only look at the issue logically and objectively from every conceivable angle to really say you know the truth or have ever truly looked for it.
Chapter 5,
Consequences Of The Same Sex Driven Bisexual Who Control LGBT Campaign Groups
Can any rights groups or institution really be sure what materials are needed to be taught on sexuality in schools to all children regardless of sexuality.
(a) Promoting Schooling Education Materials From The Bisexual Perspective.
The promotion of educational materials for schools on the issue of Homosexuality and sexuality is at the top of many LGBT group’s interests at present. Unfortunately, they are combating each others agendas over what exactly the materials are, that should taught in schools to all children regardless of sexuality without being able to come to any form of conclusions. But there is another aspect that has caused this draw back on LGBT groups coming to any unanimous decision on what materials should taught, and this draw back is the LGBT group leaders who believe Homosexuality is a choice, or be more precise, Bisexuals who believe their Homosexuals who made such a choice, and are trying to design, write and look for educational materials based solely on that form of belief of sexuality to legitimise to children and are refuting materials that promote Homosexuality as an inherent dignity. This is a seriously dangerous ground, that such people attempting to produce any such materials that construe human sexuality as a sexual preference meaning an optional choice of behaviour, do not realise or are even aware of any dangers to surmise a possible outcome of consequences. And any consequences will be on Heterosexual & Homosexual children as the only children to identify with such materials are Bisexual children. The whole point of the need for such materials is not only so Homosexual and Bisexual children have some form of guidance to understand that what they are is normal and natural, it is also imperative that Heterosexual children understand what Homosexuality & Bisexuality is about to contradict the prejudice of a stigma, which would intern reduce the hateful bullying from Heterosexual children who will naturally perceive Homosexuality the same way prejudice adults perceive Homosexuality.
(b) Heterosexual Parents Perspective On Such Education Materials.
From a bias and prejudice Heterosexual parents point of view do not only believe Homosexuality is a choice to be that way, they believe no materials whatsoever should be legitimised and taught to children on the issue of Homosexuality because if they believe it is a choice to be that way, it can be acquired, and if it can be acquired, they dare not allow any form of materials on such lifestyles to be taught to their children as normal and acceptable. Because if a parent believes Homosexuality is acquired, you would have to be something else first, creating a fear that their perspective Heterosexual child may decide to make such a life choice to be that way against their genuine inherent nature. And if the LGBT groups promote the teaching of educational materials designed from the Bisexual perspective, then these actually confirm the bias and prejudice beliefs on the subject that would cause uproars between parents, schools and even the government & church.
Very few people actually know, that this was the exact same core of the problem in 1987, when the London borough of Haringey lesbian & gay unit wrote to all local authority maintained school governing heads, on campaigning for them to promote a positive image of Homosexuality as normal & OK to be that way in schools to pupils in the attempt to reduce homophobic bullying and give some form of supporting guidance to young Homosexuals in schools from indirect & direct discrimination. Unfortunately a massive whirlwind trailing back to government was induced, invoked & created. The Ecclesiastical Committee guided by the General Synod put forward a Church of England measure through government to all politicians for an amendment into a local government Bill outlawing any education, teaching or promotion on Homosexual relationships in any public maintained, private, nursery and religious schools as normal genuine family relationships and with this amendment written by MP Michael Howard, legally classified any such relationship as pretend in The Local Government Act1988, with a new amendment section 2a, subsection 1 Clause (a)-(b) in Section 28 of the Local Authority Act 1986 (c 10.)
Prohibition on promoting Homosexuality by teaching or by publishing material.
2A. (1) A local authority shall not;
(a) Intentionally promote Homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting Homosexuality.
(b) Promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of Homosexuality as a pretend family relationship.
2) Nothing in subsection (1) above shall be taken to prohibit the doing of anything for the purpose of treating or preventing the spread of disease.
Although Clause 2a, 2) was a National Health Service overriding protocol allowing the teaching of sex education on the subject to prevent STD’s regardless how any teacher would teach it, because the NHS has that power over government on any possible health risks to the general public that could be reduced. This power is given to the NHS through the European Declaration of Human rights as a national security of public Health in the National Health Service Act 1977. So Section 28 allowed the teaching of sexual education on the subject, but criminalized any teaching of genuine loving Homosexual relationships, and classed them as pretend. But that was then, and this is now, because right groups have also missed one major mistake in their belief of what materials should be taught in schools to children…
(c) Discriminating Against Homosexual & Heterosexual Children With Life Choice
If rights groups actually manage to design materials for schools in teaching Homosexuality or any sexuality as normal and acceptable choice in life, they would be discriminating against every Heterosexual and Homosexual child that is witness to, because they will identify with such materials and will without a doubt find it offensive and discriminatory in being subjected to it. But Homosexual children will be the worst of in witnessing any form of such materials because it is hard enough for them to cope with discrimination and harassment through bullying and prejudice view from Heterosexual society without having their own perspective minority pushing these victimising materials on them. Although the chances of these materials reaching schools is very slim, because;-
(d) Rejected Materials From Health and Education Authorities:
If any materials designed and written by state official authority’s associated to the LGBT groups and their leaders on the prospect that sexuality is a sexual preference of choice that may imply the inclusion of Heterosexuality, no parent or school system would ever allow such materials to enter schools and be legitimised to children. No parent or teacher let alone the children, would ever identify with such materials and would immediately find them offensive and discriminatory to the moral values of the inherent dignity of Heterosexual society regardless of religion, and these materials will without a doubt, be rejected.
(e) Bisexuals Unknowingly Discriminating against Homosexuals and Heterosexuals Through the Political Agenda, Education Reform and Social Scene.
The LGBT community social scene has been conditioning sex on to its own minority for the past three decades but the social scene reached a social peak in the very late 1990’s and since then the social LGBT public has levelled and have now started to slowly reduce. This has caused confusion as to why, which has been expressed through the social scene lifestyle guides like QX, Boys Magazine and the Pink-Paper. The social scene was always advertised as a socio-sex-environment but over the past ten years the promotion of Homosexuality as a lifestyle of an optional existence based solely on sex with no promoted aspects or images of monogamous love to contradict it has unknowingly caused offence and discrimination to many genuine Homosexuals who are making every attempt to push themselves away for the social scene, because the social environment never promoted what genuine Homosexuals believe they are. And when rights groups fight for rights and get nowhere it is a cause for concern as these genuine Homosexuals identify a link between these problems and the fight for civil rights and are unable to explain it to themselves. When government & official LGBT advisory groups promote the need for education on Homosexuality there is endless confusion and contradiction as to what is needed to be taught between both parties and neither parties seem to come to any conclusion as to what is causing the contradiction of the agendas.
(f) Conclusion (Catch 22):
When any rights groups or advisory groups support or promote any government legal proposals or decisions that promote or construe the LGBT community as an optional sexual preference regardless whether they believe it is OK to make such a life choice to be that way, they themselves directly discriminate against and victimise Homosexuals. The only answer is to work from one end of the spectrum of sexuality on truly understanding what exactly genuine Homosexuals would need to gain a healthy childhood mental growth on life from schooling materials on true inherent dignity. If one could achieve that, then one would simultaneously fulfil all schooling material needs for Bisexual children, which will automatically induce the eradication of prejudice perceptions from Heterosexual Children and intern remove the homophobic bullying. But what exactly do Homosexual children need to be taught to them in schools that Bisexual LGBT civil rights & advisory group leaders are not realising. If Bisexuals are confusing themselves as to what sexuality actually is and they believe it is a choice; and Heterosexuals believe Homosexuals are incapable of eternal monogamous love for the same sex through a life choice of sexual behaviour; and parents do not know or understand what to teach their children in relation to encompassing the understanding and identification of their child’s sexuality for a healthy mental growth and to teach their children to reframe from prejudice views on others; and the LGBT rights groups are arguing & confusing each other over what education materials should be promoted to children on sexuality; and the government are refusing most things the LGBT civil rights groups fight for, because of the promotion of an optional sexual preference; and aspects of what Bisexuals who believe they are Homosexuals promote through politics and the social scene and every form of gay national media on what prejudice society sees and believes it is, only confirms the worst perceptions of the prejudice and political confusion to act against them as well as loosing support from genuine Homosexuals who understand their own sexuality; Then all these things have developed a paradox of mutually conflicting and dependant conditions, that create a catalyst of endlessly looping dilemmas and circumstances of which there is no escape. Or to be precise the biggest catch 22 and 36o degree fight against oppression of which neither side of the entire controversial debate know the cause or core of the problem that created it, the situation sustaining it, or understand any genuine reality of truth to work out any form of conclusion to resolve it.
Chapter 6,
Understanding What Materials Really Are Needed To Be Taught In Schools To Children.
An anomaly
Society like to emulate that the rough population statistics of the Homosexual population is about 10% of the UK population, as institutions have stated that around 1 in every 10 people are gay. The population of the UK is almost 62 million, so that means that the UK LGBT community population would be roughly around 6.2 million. Global statistics of suicide rates in young children between the ages of 10–20, have been calculated in so-called civilised countries to be in the thousands per year, and mostly between 3 to 4 thousand yearly and on occasions up to 7 thousand, but this statistic has brought with it a serious dilemma. If the LGBT community are roughly only 10 percent of the population, why are official reported suicide statistics, reporting that “over half” of all suicide rates of young children and teenagers are sexuality related…
That qualifies as a serious problem and a mysterious one, as for years health institutions and Universities have been trying to help lobby groups find the core of the problem as to why the largest percent of Homosexuals have the highest rate of mental stress syndromes and suicide rates globally. Unfortunately these institutional research findings have been obtained by seriously flawed research basis, no matter how expertly they were done, that no one has realised, because of a major factor that has been completely missed in all global researches done to find the core of the problem. The basis of all professional national and international research institutions have done to find the core problem was conducted by examining the social scene of the LGBT community, and basing it materials on measuring sexual behaviour and sexual needs. This next extensive piece contains the B-F-P’s findings to the core of the problem of all suicide rates and global mental stress syndromes in Homosexuals, and you may find it disturbing. Because the missing factor to the core of the problem, was not any aspects of the LGBT community’s social sex scene environment or the measuring any form of sexual behaviour.
(a) A True Perspective of the Homosexual Social Scene.
Brief history: In the sixties when what is perceived as Homosexuality was illegal, there was very little of what could be called, any kind of social scene. As it consisted of just a few bars and little in the way of clubs, which were mainly underground, and were always monitored by the police. After being a Homosexual, was legalised at the end of the sixties, it gave Homosexuals a new lease of life, even though the age of consent was at 21. The hidden private aspects of London Soho threw its doors open for the first time, with every intention of expansion with the help and acknowledgement of community activism. Between 1970 and 1980, it was a slow growth to bring many social venues into the light for its public until the 80's. As the eighties continued, the social scene of the LGBT community's clubs & bars in the west end grew exponentially, as did the capacity of age groups finding that social scene were getting younger & younger. With that decade, came two main stream social guides magazines, created to advertise the social standing and the ever growing social scene, Pink Paper & Boyz and later QX. As the social scene expanded, it grew through the nineties it reached its growth peak between 1995-97 even though the LGBT public using the scene still has a never-ending growth, and that public finding the scene, are still getting younger and younger, even down to the ages of 13 to 15…
The Truth: If anyone were to believe that the Heterosexual social scene is summarily the same as the LGBT community's, you would be seriously mistaken. This can be easily seen in how they present themselves as a people and how they interact with each other as a minority. The social scene of the LGBT community, has been built and founded, over the past 30 years, on what sells the most, SEX… Not only that, it is the only social scene that openly and nationally advertises, promotes, and endorses it to its young and its general public with every single avenue to obtain it, without any restriction or avenues to contradict it, and to the point where the largest majority of Homosexual's & Bisexuals lives have become a lifestyle and not just an aspect of their sexuality. The promotion of sex became apparent in the beginning of the seventies and expanded to such a degree and speed, every bar & club became an advertised and promoted avenue to finding "sexual partners". Within the 80's - early 90's many bar's & Clubs promoted sexual conduct on these premises with dark rooms, mazes, cubicle's and toilets. And also within these venues, varying ways of helping its public find temporary sexual partners.
For example "Find a man" Number tagging, where the general public have a numbered stickers placed on them as they enter the premises, which they can check their number on a message board in the premises, where other patrons place messages next to the number on the board of the person wearing that number, in hope of reciprocation. "Underwear nights" in clubs, where the interiors are deliberately kept in the dark, making the prospective patrons, more aroused in blindly finding temporary sexual partners. "Gay Foam party nights". Advertised to get patrons to undress and blindly find a sexual partner in a blinding tower of foam, either semi or fully naked. From 1999 "Text sex nights" along the same principles as number tagging, but using mobile phones instead and large projector screens with text replies.
As the nineties continued the sexual conduct within bars & clubs slowly became restricted and the promotion of such things were equally reduced, except something new grew from it… Sauna's: Gay saunas have expanded throughout London, some are part of commercial chains. But all have been specifically built for the use of something irrelevant to its practical name and advertised to its public as that irrelevant use as a place to find and have sex in these saunas. Built with a plethora of endless private cubicles, mazes, dark rooms, glory wholes & video porn rooms. Although it is not illegal to advertise all these sexual activity uses, it is illegal for the public to commit sexual activities on the premises. The premises owners know that fact, and promote the illegality of sexual activity on such premises with police warning notices that are placed on the internal walls; right next to the free lubrication and condom dispensers.
Many people don’t know that none of these premises are legally licensed sex houses, they are only licensed as legitimate saunas and believe it or not, most of them are owned by Heterosexual proprietors. Something that has always existed is "Cottaging grounds in toilets & parks", and for decades even before any social scene Homosexuals have found toilets and parks as a way to find and express themselves sexually, and "none of these places are where Homosexuals go to fin |
