|
Bisexuality; A Dangerous Conundrum
By Jonathan J Joslin
Contents
Preamble
Introduction
1) Understanding The Confines of Human Sexuality
(a) Misconceptions through Unjustified Political Correctness.
(b) The Inherent Connection To A Particular Gender That Makes Sexuality.
(c) Different Sexual States And Levels.
2) A Necessary Distinction
(a) The Three Sexualities And Their Distinction’s.
(b) What Is The Confines Of Sexuality That Homosexuals Are Accused Of Being.
3) (Life Choice theory)
(a) A Logical Interpretation Of The Life Choice Theory.
(b) Judgement, purely by perception.
4) Core Of The Problem Causing The Debate (Perception)
(a) Human Perception, (A Genuine Perspective Of Sexuality’s).
(b) Human Morality – Humanism.
5) A Perspective Of Consequences From The Perception of Bisexual LGBT Group Leaders
(a) Promoting Education Of Sexuality From Bisexual Perspective
(b) Heterosexual Parents Perspective On Such Education Being Taught to Heterosexual Children (No Identification With Such A Nature From Other Sexualities.)
(c) Confusing Homosexual Children Of Their Sexuality By Flawed Bias Based On Of Life Choice Theory.
(d) Rejected Materials from Health and Education Authorities.
(e) Bisexual Political Activists Unknowingly Discriminating & Victimising Homosexuals From Childhood through Education Reform, And The Social Scene.
(f) Conclusion, (Catch 22 In Producing Education Materials)
6) Understanding What Materials Are Needed To Be Taught In Schools.
(A Case Study; researched in 2001-2002)
(a) The Homosexual Social Scene.
(b) Flawed Government Health Research On HIV & Aids.
(c) The Conditioning At The Heart Of Heterosexual Society.
(d) What If No Such Materials Existed.
(e) Prospects That Neither Side Of The Issue Have Contemplated.
7) Final Conclusion (Social Conditioning: How easy is it to be conditioned)
(a) The Collection Of Stigma Labels Used To Abuse.
(b) If Homosexuality & Bisexuality Is Seen As Natural, Why Refuse Marriage Laws.
(c) Do Any Rights Groups Really Know What Materials Are Needed In Schools.
Preamble
The grounds behind the B-F-P project was four years of genuine sociology and psychology research conducted and produced by B-F-P on the issues from HIV & Aids research, law, legislation, to sexuality from the psychological perspective of the three perceived sexualities: Bisexuality, Homosexuality & Heterosexuality. This was done to find the core of the problem to the international debate and finding out what education curriculum material are needed in schools on sexuality.
Introduction
During 2001 - July 2002 this psychology research was conducted for the purpose of the B-F-P social reform project that is in present development. During the research on every ground of the issue on sexuality in understanding the practicality and logistics behind the truth of it, B-F-P found an unforeseen mystery as to how and what sexuality really is perceived to be by all, and has revealed a catch 22 in fighting oppression that has been caused by this perception. The reasons behind this confounded issue, was to discover the true core of a problem behind why so many believe that one sexuality is inherent and the rest are a life choice, and why there are so many who believe they never made such a choice of Homosexuality, even when accused of such an acquired life by “members” of their own prospective minority, where such members believe they are Homosexuals who made such a life choice of Homosexuality to accuse others of the same choice. In 2001 B-F-P reviewed a vast amount of international material on prejudice views of the stigma that Homosexuality is a life choice to be that way. This material was not confined to religious prejudice or the bias Heterosexual perspective on the issue: a vast amount was found through every form of the LGBT community press and rights groups views on gay lifestyles, gay living, on being gay, being ok to be gay, its ok if you want to be gay, reasons & views based on those premises in fighting for law & rights, and what laws should be fought for, and which laws had the least presidents to the issue of the morality on what was needed to support Homosexuals as a people and a minority; when there was actually a complete other side to this coin, from another majority of the same community that believe they are discriminated against by their own community; Genuine Homosexuals with an inherent connection form birth to only the same sex. You may feel that last statement was ambiguous, discriminatory or even confusing. Through an investigation on education materials into the LGBT community and their LGBT public’s personal views, B-F-P found a serious and dangerous situation based on looking at the entire political & moral debate from the psychological perspective of Bisexuality, on how Bisexuals perceive and surmise the reality of sexuality in relation to what they believe Homosexuality & Heterosexuality is, and the consequences that that perspective induces a conditioning on others through politics, fighting for rights and all types of national media. This conditioning has left the largest majority of Bisexuals in the global population of the LGBT community to believe they are Homosexuals who made a life choice to be that way, who also find being called a Bisexual offensive. In June 2002 B-F-P conducted a 300-person survey within the London social scene of the LGBT community to obtain and general perspective of the LGBT community on what they believe sexuality is, in relation to themselves. This survey was an anonymous questionnaire and contained only questions relating to a persons self-evident understanding of their own nature in relation to other sexualities, which it did not contain any questions or references on sexual behaviour or sexual preferences. The findings of this survey revealed startling results, and these findings were compared to every form of national and international entertainment & current affairs media that B-F-P had researched the previous year on the general populations views regardless of sexuality on what is believed to be Homosexuality & Bisexuality through braking down the exact meanings of every written & verbal statement, and views made on the subject in relation to a persons standing and knowledge of their own sexuality
The results in brief, found by B-F-P not only explain exactly how all perceive the issue sexuality, it explains a seriously misunderstood international common misconception of sexuality and all the consequences thereof, which go as far as civil rights and all LGBT media’s unknowingly working against equality over the past 40 years and indorsing & instituting inequality into society as a whole, through mutually dependant social conditioning, that has created a catalyst of endlessly looping dilemmas and circumstances of which there is no escape, that is an international catch 22 on fighting oppression to a level they couldn’t possibly fathom the consequences. And an unknown and unprecedented act of discrimination, harassment and victimisation specifically on genuine Homosexuals by Bisexuals in the LGBT community media and rights groups systems, without actually realising they were doing it, to even perceive any possible consequences thereof.
The residual conclusions of research discovered a new premise of consequences and revealed an unexplored angle on what is imperatively needed to be taught in schools to all children on sexuality, which has absolutely nothing to do with the scientific aspects of sex education.
Chapter 1,
The Confines of Human Sexuality.
This brief is strategically written for you to understand every part of it and m any sections that contain material that many believe to be not true, but this deliberate, as it continually explores particular beliefs, issues, ideals of every side of the debate to get core of the problem that created them, by cover many different personal beliefs which are contrary to one another; these parts are “more than relevant” to the legal implications of these new laws, as these new laws and a religious ministry dossier that B-F-P has found are based those anomalies. So please read this brief objectively?
Over the past 40 years activists and civil rights lobby groups have fought hard to obtain civil and legal standing as a minority and a community of people against a global prejudice oppression. So the a question must be asked; Do civil rights and activists know exactly why the global LGBT community are denied every civil right, benefit and law that they fight for. Most people will believe its prejudice and hate because of an act of sex the general society does not like and they’re just bigots. You only have to look at any religious debate on the subject that dictates, the belief of Heterosexuals religious or not, believe that Homosexuality is a “life choice” vice of an act of sex.
But, what exactly is, this choice in relation too. Because it has never been recorded of any civil rights campaign against this Heterosexual specific belief. Very few people in society hate purely for the sake of hating, hate will always have a reason. Where would it leave civil rights groups if they realised this reason had nothing to do with the prejudice over disgust of a particular sexual behaviour? If that’s true, it puts the fight for equality into a completely different ball game, and you can’t fight fire with fire; you must first understand why it’s burning. Over the past few years a rift has been building within the UK LGBT community, on a accusations that the LGBT community as a whole needs more unity to further the fight against inequality.
B-F-P through its research has made some alarming discoveries about the LGBT community that is causing this rift, and believe it or not, this rift is being created over the belief systems on the issue of what sexuality is. And B-F-P has found that the largest percent of civil rights lobby groups have been directly discriminating against and victimising all Homosexual men and women over the past 40 years in their promoted prêt-elections on what sexuality is in fighting inequality, and they don’t realise they are doing it. But the LGBT community public have to accept this discrimination because they are only ones is fighting for them in legal reform. However much one would like to believe one truly knows and understands what sexuality actually is, B-F-P has found very few people actually do from every side of the debate, and it that that is creating the core of the problem to this rift, and it is core of the problem to international oppression.
The highest priority of every human rights law is written to fully support the whole human family that is based on the natural aspects in life of inherent dignity, which means from birth and without a choice. This is explained in the interpretation introduction preamble of all Human rights laws, as anything else is acquired, meaning a choice, optional or changeable, and has the least status of protection under any human rights laws, and where religious freedom is seen as higher priority than the basic human rights of a minority of human beings. The whole basis of the political and religious debate against Homosexuality and the civil rights agenda, is hidden in the following statement that prejudice politicians and religious ministers, priests, bishops and churches always use against Homosexuality:> [Homosexuality is life choice to be that way, it is neither natural or normal, there is no moral equivalence between Homosexuality and Heterosexuality]
Do you know what a life choice to be that way really means, and what it is in relation too? Do you know what would make that moral equivalence?
Does anyone really no what sexuality really is?
B-F-P has found that very very very few people know what sexuality actually is
You will most likely feel like skipping the next part believing you know all what is necessary on the subject of the confines of Human Sexuality.
(a) Misconceptions through unjustified political correctness
For centuries since society built an international social stigma over Homosexuality being a life choice, many people from both sides of the debate over past four decades have tried to make a distinction on sexuality to justify personal beliefs, possible realities and issues. Unfortunately every distinction that has been voiced by both side’s of the debate have left out one major factor on what sexuality actually is, and in doing so, they institutionalise a premise that sexuality is behavioural based which furthers the stigma of choice. For decades various religions, ministries, councils, sociology groups, health authority's, politicians and LGBT rights groups have made endless statements of belief that sexuality is apparently experimented and fixed at puberty between the ages of 10 to 16. This is completely unfounded as the only individual’s qualified to give any true definition of sexuality would be a psychologist. Were these people 100% sure or have conclusive proof before making any voiced opinions or statutory claims. If you believe sexuality is experimented and fixed at a certain age, It can be explained why you would believe such a premise. Contrary to what most people would like to believe, behaviour does not make sexuality. Are you confused?
The Core Basis Of Sexuality;
The only way to find the truth about what makes human sexuality, and find its point of origin, is by removing from a person, every material and physical need and want and all elements of motivation of material purpose as a member of society. This would only leave the natural inherent drive & soul purpose of a human being.
Every child from the youngest ages can identify the inherent connection of which their natural drive directs them as they grow and see the people and the environment of people around them, and mainly within all other children around them. This is the inherent connection to a particular sex-(M/F), meaning the permanent inherent psychological and physiological connection to another gender regardless of sexual needs, of which can not be ignored, eradicated, turned on or off, or be manipulated, and most children will not understand it as sexuality, or recognise it as being sexual in anyway until around the ages of 5-7, and that is without any form of sexual experience or knowledge, but a child will recognise this inherent connection from the earliest ages. As every child is brought up in every different type of environment, it will be the up bringing by their parents on which that child would recognise their natural connection, more or less than others. As a child grows he or she will learn to understand what their sexuality means by the age of 8-11. Many young teenagers will have their first sexual experiences between the ages of 9 & 16 (this mainly, will not involve intercourse of any kind) and this has been wrongly labelled by official Government sources, politicians and national entertainment media as “experimentation”.
Experimentation: To experiment in sex is to intentionally make a consented act of sexual conduct based on an adrenalin rush of sexual arousal without any coercion by sexual attraction or by an inherent connection to a particular gender- (M/F). Solely on the possibility of seeing if it appeals to one or if one might enjoy the experience of it with that type of person, on the basis of sexual relief or curiosity. Even if that gender-(M/F) of the consented other is a gender which he or she would or would not be normally sexually attracted.
The Inherent connection of sexuality: Instead of a responsive prompted action based on a deep, natural, physiological & psychological attachment in a need to make physical contact based on a human driven sexual attraction through a naturally driven inherent connection to a particular gender.
Understanding the inherent connection: If you are confused as to what this means, it can be very easily explained. For example: If any person was to close their eyes and tried not to think about sex ever again, or if they tried not to fall in love, or if they tried to make every effort to work against feeling sexual for a particular gender-(male/female); they would still know, that if they ever continue to feel for another gender, what that gender is that they are inherent connected too. You cannot remove that inherent connection, or even turn it off, or eradicate it, or work against it, because what ever is inherent is from birth; anything else is acquired, meaning a choice. Any person can make a conscious choice on the person they choose to have sex with, but it is absolutely impossible for any human being to make a conscious choice of eternal marital love on the person of which they fall in love. The true core origin of sexuality is an unchangeable inherently connected physiology to a particular gender from birth by the chromosomes of the hypothalamus of the brain, which is the only scientifically known and proven part of the brain that establishes & controls all emotional states and sexual desires within a human being for another, which is the hidden core of a persons sexuality.
Different Sexual States.
SEXUAL ATTRACTION; (Inherent)
Sexual Attraction is confined only as the emotional and sexual natural drive of the inherent connection of a person to another sex-(M/F). On which emotionally activates a sensitive psychological & physiological connection, on a need to make physical and or verbal contact for the purpose of a binding psychological & physiological beneficial need of an intimate state with another person, permanently or temporarily with attachment to sexual relations "and or” commitment.
Sexual Attraction is the physiologically active part of a persons inherent connection, which "will not" manifest itself towards "any other person" of which there is "not" a naturally inherent driven connection. (E.g.; A Heterosexual male will only be "sexually attracted" by his inherently driven connection of Heterosexuality to the opposite sex and not the same sex)
SEXUAL AROUSAL; Sexual Arousal does not always or necessarily need sexual attraction to manifest itself, as arousal manifests itself in many forms. Any person will become aroused by hormones which is a natural chemical in a persons system without the need to be in the vicinity of any other individual, or even other external & visual sexual influences. Most people can wake up in the morning naturally aroused without thinking of sex. And also a person can use arousal to relieve sexual tension (Masturbation) with or without being sexually oppressed. It is very common for persons who are sexually oppressed to also use arousal for physical sexual relations purposes with other persons they are not even sexually attracted too, "even if" normally inherently connected to that particular sex-(M/F) but only for the purpose of sexual gratification. (E.g.; A sexually oppressed Heterosexual male with the need for sex, that "can not" find his personal preferred type of female but finds a woman that he is not sexually attracted too, and allows himself to act on and receive sexual gratification, or experiment's to see if that type of female or person appeals because of either server sexual oppression "or" psychological interest of a difference of sexual conduct or practises by experimentation)
SEXUAL LUST; Sexual lust can manifest itself through many forms but it is mainly "either" a form of psychological infatuation of another person over sex through sexual attraction, or an extremely strong temporary sexual arousal "with or without" sexual attraction over oppressed sexual needs, with very little outlet to express or find another gender (M/F) to relieve such sexual tensions.
SEXUAL DESIRE; Sexual desire is not much different from sexual lust but it is mainly the predominant or temporary psychological over-interest of thought by way of imagination grown from sexual arousal or attraction towards another sex-(M/F) "or" a form of interest, in untried sexual conduct or practises based on the thought of experimentation.
FORNICATION; Fornication can be a plethora of sexual activity's, but fornication is mainly about physical sexual pleasure with or without any form of intercourse or intimacy and intercourse is self explanatory for whatever sexuality.
RAPE / RAPISTS; Rape is an immoral act or attempt whatever sexuality, and all self acknowledged sexuality's (Heterosexuals & Homosexuals) see rape as the same illegal standing to each other. The act of rape about power and control and not based on physical relief, and can be by whatever form of sexual activity that can only be classed as such if it is between two or more persons. Rape is where one or more person is unwilling or un-consented to a sexual activity and are forced too, either physically or by psychologically manipulated to receive and endure sexual fornication against their will. An attempt of rape is were the unwilling party rejects such activity by whatever means and does not wish to participate. This does not mean the aggressor's are not rapists because the act did not take place, because the act was attempted showing their intentions.
[These are simple grounds of human psychological and physiological needs & wants. So bare these in mind as you read this brief as it will constantly bring you back to understanding what sexuality capable off and its confined limitations.]
Sexual attraction is a main direct expression of that inherent connection, and a person cannot be sexually attracted to any person, that they are not inherently connected too, or who fits to their visual personal preference, as everyone has their particular type of person they are sexually attracted too visually by sight. For example: Heterosexual men are only attracted to particular types of females ("but not all females!”) and they will not be sexually attracted to any woman that does not fit their personally preferred types.
If a Heterosexual man pushes himself in the direction of woman that he is not sexually attracted too, any sexually physical outcome will only be based on the temporary arousal or lust if and when it manifests itself simultaneously between both parties for that man and woman to achieve any form of sexual gratification, which is usually either based on sexual oppression, sexual desperation through unavailable personal preference types, or experimentation based on the interest trying different things. The inherent connection of sexuality will naturally disallow any “want” or “emotionally motivated sexual need”, or to fall eternally in love with any individual they are not sexually attracted to that does not fill their personal preference type regardless of being inherently connected to that particular gender.
Thus separating the intrinsic inherent physiology from any behavioural needs, showing the inherent connection is what makes sexuality, and not the behaviour of sexual choices that acted on it, which constitutes an obvious and irrefutable drawn line between the two. Many believe other sexualities are a ‘life choice’ and as many of the accused refute this accusation, others believe they themselves made such a life choice without separating that inherent physiological connection, from physical needs. Although it is a fact that not one recorded scientific institution, religion or government globally has ever come close to the correct conclusions to produced material to separate the two.
A Necessary Distinction
The following findings were based on the results of a 300-person response to an anonymous questionnaire produced and conducted by B-F-P in June-July 2002 on the LGBT community social scene, to obtain the publics personal view of sexuality in relation to their personal understanding of their own, and in relation to research of national and international political and entertainment media & public views and expression of the issue of Homosexuality on working out the exactly what those views actually mean, whether from bias & prejudice society or from supporting Heterosexuals and all the LGBT community media, conducted in 2001.
If any truth lay on there being three true sexuality's Heterosexual, Homosexual & Bisexual. It would be human arrogance to believe that only one specific sexuality is inherent and the other two sexuality's are experimented and then fixed and believing the first to more superior. But there is a majority of people who believe they themselves made such a directional life choice to be that way and believe that “no” sexuality is inherently fixed from birth.
To understand a genuine flaw in these experimentation and life choice presumptions, please read the following distinctions and psychology on the following perceived, believed and refuted sexualities.
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meanings of; Sexuality: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of a particular gender.
Name: All who go under that name; a family, a clan, individual, people, minority, or race; within the meanings or the terms of the name. (Also applies to inanimate objects)
B-F-P distinctions on all sexualities that many refute & believe
("If" there are three true inherent sexuality's, these are their distinctions)
[The following distinctions below have been constructed from in-depth B-F-P research and a 300 person survey on the London LGBT social scene to cover many different beliefs which do differ, but it is still important to understand those other beliefs as well your own.]
Heterosexuality: An unchangeable inherent connection from birth, to find a permanent state of eternal monogamous love towards ‘only’ persons of the opposite sex.
[The name Heterosexual is the abbreviation of Heterosexuality, to mean the individual person]
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meaning
Heterosexual: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of the opposite sex.
Equal to the official meanings of Bisexual and Homosexual, as it only carries inherent and immutable characteristics and no characteristics of behaviour that acts on those inherent characteristics.
[The largest percent Heterosexuals in society believe and state that this is what makes them Heterosexual, however there are many who do not believe in the existence of such a nature that is “only” driven towards the opposite sex from birth]
Some people reading this who call themselves Homosexuals, may possibly feel confused, believe it or not, Bisexuality is more complicated than anyone might think or has even been revealed before.
Bisexuality: Bisexuality is a variable physiology of an unbalanced inherent connection from birth to find a permanent state of eternal monogamous love towards persons of both genders.
But!
The birth state of the inherent connection is not always equally balanced, as many Bisexuals are born with a more predominantly driven inherent connection to one gender-(M/F) more than the other.
[This is from birth, and the inherent connection is identifiable at the earliest ages of childhood in all people regardless of sexuality. A child will personally identify a close connection to the gender he or she is driven to by sight, before any forms of sexual needs or aspirations are ever felt. As with any sexuality the nature of understanding sexual needs is only experienced after adolescence and through maturity where a person becomes more self-aware through the growth of knowledge on sexual experience and needs.]
But because of the unbalanced nature, Bisexuals will become to understand which of the genders he or she is more predominant driven towards for more pleasurable sexual relations in relation to the most predominantly driven connection, over the psychological measuring of sexual needs. Which can leave them later in life ‘to believe’ that their sexuality was experimented and then became permanent or a choice at puberty, and this leaves many to believe their sexuality was not naturally set from birth. There are Bisexuals more or less equally balanced from birth and at youth can or will base their first sexual experience or most enjoyed and preferred experience with a particular ‘gender-(M/F) and never explore the other as many unbalanced Bisexuals do. But they will still have a natural drive for both genders-(M/F), as the desire for the ‘preferred’ gender will be the most influential. This can or will make the inherent connection for the other gender-(M/F) less desirable, and almost unnoticeable and for many ‘nonexistent’ but not eradicated or a miss-understandable avenue of sexuality.
(For Example*: A boy in his youth before any form of sexual experience in life, feels emotionally & inherently connected to both genders, but is predominantly driven to one gender more than the other. Later in life after sexual experience, he becomes to understand that predominantly driven connection and does not consciously continue towards the other gender, or feel any need to explore the gender again or pursue it further.)
It is rare but later in life a Bisexual sexual attraction can ‘sometimes’ vary, and may start re-exploring the other gender-(M/F) by whatever unlimited possibilities. For example: through sexual experiences or lengthy periods of time surrounded by people of the other gender (M/F) creating psychological intimacy. However, when it comes to falling in love with either gender-(M/F), it will only be by whatever attraction to one gender-(M/F) that comes first, and never both simultaneously.
Bisexuality is extremely complicated but it is explainable by a differential gradient in an individual’s inherent connection from birth, based on what is above or below 50% on a particular gender [For example: Opposite sex 1% and Same sex at 99%]. The more or less equally balanced Bisexuals are around a 50-50% gradient, but it can all be brought down to three basic levels.
• Opposite sex-Bisexuality: Inherently & predominantly driven from birth by 60 – 95% towards the opposite sex more that the same sex, with or without sexual experiences or relationships of the same sex through adolescence into maturity. Making the inherent drive for the same sex extremely vague but not misunderstood. Many opposite sex driven Bisexuals not only believe they are Heterosexuals, but believe this is what makes Heterosexuality if you do not veer towards the same sex.
• Bisexuality: More or less equally balanced inherent connection towards both genders, but sexually they will find more pleasurable sexual experiences with one gender (M/F) more than the other sex (M/F).
• Same sex-Bisexuality: Inherently & predominantly driven from birth by 60 – 95% towards the same sex more that the opposite sex, with or without sexual experiences or relationships of the opposite sex through adolescence into maturity. Making the inherent drive for the opposite sex extremely vague but not misunderstood. Many same sex driven Bisexuals not only believe they are Homosexuals, but believe this is what makes Homosexuality if you do not veer towards the opposite sex.
Because of the international social stigma that Homosexuality is a choice, Bisexuals of every level, personally believe Homosexuality and Heterosexuality is a life choice, by either taking a well socially accepted and legally supported left turn in the road of life, or taking the unsupported right turn (metaphorically speaking). Although opposite sex driven and same sex driven Bisexuals believe sexuality is a choice, if one was to ask either of them the question: Can you give up and ignore that gender you are predominantly driven towards for the rest of your life, and concentrate solely on the other gender they are driven less towards. You will find that the only answer they could give, is no! But if was a optional life choice as they blindly believe, they should be more than capable of it. But social conditioning stops Bisexuals from realising you cannot make a choice on a fixed differential that was already naturally integrated, regardless of sexual needs or its unbalanced nature.
B-F-P has found through its survey that the Bisexuals, regardless of which gradient drive they are, would argue against and disbelieve without question the existence of any sexuality that has an inherent connection to only “one” gender from birth. Which is just a belief, and an unjustified one at that.
The “name” Bisexual is the abbreviation of Bisexuality, to mean the individual person.
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meaning
Bisexual: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of both sexes.
Equal to the official meanings of Heterosexual and Homosexual, as it only carries inherent and immutable characteristics and no characteristics of behaviour that act’s on those inherent characteristics.
[However the largest percent Heterosexual society do not believe in the existence of such a nature that is inherently connected towards both sexes either from birth or anytime in life]
_____________________________________
Homosexual: An unchangeable inherent connection from birth, to find a permanent state of eternal monogamous love towards ‘only’ persons of the same sex.
The “name” Homosexual is the abbreviation of Homosexuality, to mean the individual person.
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meaning
Homosexual: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of the same sex.
Equal to the official meanings of Heterosexual and Bisexual, as it only carries inherent and immutable characteristics and no characteristics of behaviour that act’s on those inherent characteristics.
[The largest percent Homosexuals believe and state that this is what makes them Homosexuals, however the largest percent of Heterosexual society and all Bisexuals do not believe in the existence of such a nature that is “only” driven towards the same sex from birth with no connection to the opposite sex. Which leaves all Bisexuals and Heterosexuals, whether they believe its wrong or ok to be that way, to directly socially and politically victimising and discriminating against Homosexuals who state and believe this their nature]
No one has ever made any in-depth distinction on sexuality especially Bisexuality like this before and this material is based on genuine sociology and psychology research done by B-F-P conducted in 2002. Even though prejudice Heterosexual’s accuse Homosexuals of a life-choice to be that way. Bisexuals have absolutely no idea what that means in relation these first and last distinctions but it is this inherent connection that makes sexuality, which is not visual state of being not the sexual behaviour that acted on it.
(b) What exactly is the sexuality that bias Heterosexual society, government, church, religious ministry & prejudice person accuses Homosexuals of?
A Life Choice vice of deviant sexual behaviour by Heterosexuals
Homosexuals are condemned by religion on the basis that people believe the Bible teaches them that Homosexuals are Heterosexuals that have chosen a life long vice of sexual behaviour towards persons of the same sex. This would mean that they are incapable of any true emotional feeling for each other, as a Heterosexual would for the opposite sex, as any true emotional connection, would only be inherently towards persons of the opposite sex, and they would logically be Heterosexual by their natural attraction through an inherent connection to the opposite sex. Every true Homosexual, not only categorically denies this, but believes, states, demonstrate and campaign for civil rights & laws on the pretext that they are born that way to only feel inherently connected to persons of the same sex and not the opposite sex and say that is what makes them Homosexuals. They not only believe nothing else, but no self acknowledged Homosexuals have "ever" admitted to calling themselves Heterosexuals that look for sex with persons of the same sex, and are only capable of natural affection to the opposite sex by any inherent connection.
SELF-ADMITTED, HETEROSEXUAL MEN WHO HAVE HAD SEX WITH MEN
It is well documented of Heterosexual men who admit to only being Heterosexual and have had sex with other Heterosexual men or Homosexual men. The human condition of sexual oppression is very well founded with human sexuality, and Heterosexual men have been well known to look for sexual arousal in many ways. But sex between self-admitted "Heterosexual men" themselves has always been under confined conditions where they have found a way to release severe sexual pressures, In the past, e.g.; Prisons, Slavery, Army Camps & Military Institutions. And also at present day it is still well known in military institutions and prisons. But it has also been very well documented, that some men in long-term married relationships that are no longer sexually active with their spouse have been found to be "experimenting" with other types of persons to relieve such sexual tensions based on the adrenaline rush of arousal and lustful needs over sexual expression in trying different outlets. This has only been recorded as experimentation or rape, as there is no emotional reciprocation of any kind, because Heterosexuals within the confines of inherent attraction are only emotionally receptive to the opposite sex, and this has only been recorded as just a way of relieving severe sexually oppressed needs with physical ways that are “technically and morally against their inherent nature”.
Any sex between "admitted" Heterosexual men that have had sex with other men, has only ever been recorded to be either rape or temporary lust for sexual gratification & relief by experimentation, and "never" any form of emotional reciprocation or anything permanent, lifelong or committed. These men did not call themselves Homosexuals and said they felt no need too, but did call it a Homosexual act.
Some may feel there is an illogical flaw in this brief's writing, between the states of sexual needs and the life choice theory & self admitted Heterosexual men, this is expected, but there is no flaw.
Chapter 3,
What Really Is This Life Choice To Be That Way
(a) A True Logical Interpretation Of The Life Choice To Be That Way Theory.
Logically if a person "takes on" a permanent life choice of Homosexuality such as how prejudice Heterosexuals describe; that person would have to be something else first and logically the opposite to Homosexual, is Heterosexual. So technically and logically, they are teaching, preaching, stating and conditioning people to believe, that every Homosexual as an entire people world-wide in every so-called civilised country, and indirectly connected, and enough of them to populate a small country of their own, are actually Heterosexuals that have decided to take on a permanent life choice vice of sexual practising behaviour based on arousal & lust after experimentation "with persons that they will be mentally "incapable" of having any form of deep natural emotional, sensitive and physiological & psychological attachments for the "need" for physical contact, based on a human driven attraction by naturally inherent connection to another gender-(M/F).
Which logically eradicates sexual attraction from the issue as sexual attraction is only bound by an inherent connection and since behaviour does not make sexuality, and Homosexuals can only go with Homosexuals and life choice theory cuts out attraction or sexual attraction by inherent connection as it is only bound to inherent sexuality leaving only behaviour through temporary arousal and lust over and after experimentation from sexual oppression. How would either “Hetero-Homosexual” come to the conclusion of wanting to have permanent life of sex with each other and spend there lives together doing so, as any sex without any form of intimate connection or attraction, would logically only be sexual gratification by arousal if and when it manifests itself, and if it happens between the two persons simultaneously to achieve such gratification. This would mean there would be a permanent negative purpose of and for both persons towards each other for them to have actually seen any permanent life long need to live with each other that way, which intern works against their perceived inherent natural drive of Heterosexuality. Because they would be, by choice, permanently psychologically oppressing themselves from having any form of naturally beneficial emotional feelings of a necessary inherent intimate connection to base any form of partnership or relationship on such a permanent life choice to be that way. Meaning that an entire community of people's distinction worldwide on the purpose of being alive would be a pointless waist of existence. And no human being on the planet is capable of a permanent life long vice of sex "permanently acting against" their sexuality & natural sexual drive and inherent need for intimate connection.
E.g. The life choice of Heterosexuality, 1) Two Heterosexual opposites (man and woman) who are not filling any personal preferences to the opposite sex meaning they are not even sexual attracted to each other, base their existence solely on a rare temporary arousal which logically would only be produced from experimentation, server sexual oppression, or isolation from the opposite sex personal preferences, want to spend the rest of their lives together and wanting marriage and adoption laws, where Heterosexuals are incapable of “willingly” attempting a personally unfulfilling pointless lifelong committed choice to the opposite sex, let alone the same sex.
The life choice theory of Homosexuality, 2) Two genuine Heterosexual men want to spend the rest of their lives together and wanting marriage and adoption laws, even though they are neither inherently connected to each other meaning they will never even achieve any form of sexual attraction, and basing this existence solely on a rare temporary arousal which logically would only be produced from experimentation, server sexual oppression, or isolation from the opposite sex. In an existence where Heterosexuals are incapable of “willingly” achieving a personally unfulfilling pointless lifelong committed choice to the opposite sex, let alone the same sex.
3) "If Homosexuality is not a choice"; A Homosexual male spending the rest of his life having sex with a woman, even though he is not inherently connected to the opposite sex to achieve any sexual attraction for her or feels anything more than mutual friendship for her, to even be aroused without having to covering his eyes over server sexual oppression.
The connotations and implications work both ways and the connotations and implications of what every prejudice Heterosexual believes in on this subject and scale are Insane. If Homosexuality is a true sexuality and a Heterosexual has consented sex with a person of the same sex, it does not make him or her a Homosexual and it should not be classed as a Homosexual act and "vice versa!". It should be classed either way as going against ones own inherent nature and nothing more.
(b) Peoples Perspective: Anyone, whatever way they are inclined can make the conscious choice on the consenting person they choose have sex with. But it is "mentally impossible" for any human being on the planet to make the conscious choice of true love on the one of which they fall in love. That is natural, and if it's natural it's right and that is not an assumption. Every human being has a naturally born inherent connection of which they are inherently & emotionally driven towards by another gender-(M/F), whether or not they are sexually active, from "or at" any age." As this being an absolute fact, how does any person, priest & ministries come to the conclusion that Homosexuality is a life long commitment of sex with people they feel absolutely nothing for apart from temporary lust and arousal if and when it manifest it self make any sense. Has anyone looked at the issue logically, do you feel these words contradict what you already believe? Are you reading this brief objectively or from a single-minded point of view?
[Most people will automatically believe they are looking at all things objectively and logically but will never realise they are doing the complete opposite.] Any assumption of any morality issue personally concluded by a psychological perspective is only a personal assumption based on how you understand and identify what you are only capable of and know by the knowledge of your life experience and your own nature…
Does that feel strange?..
If Homosexuality is a true sexuality of its own, then it would means it is a nature that is the complete opposite to the nature of Heterosexuality and has no relevance to the nature of Bisexuality. So logically a Heterosexual or Bisexual looking at the issue from the point of view of his or her nature of Heterosexuality or Bisexuality, would it not be irrelevant to the subject when confronted with the issue of Homosexuality. Would one not logically look past they're own nature to assume or surmise other possible conclusions of an inherent connection and monogamous love or just judge it by the nature of Heterosexuality or Bisexuality, which logically, is irrelevant to what “most” Homosexuals say they are.
Are Bisexuals & Heterosexuals only looking at the issue from a single-minded point of view based only on their own nature that is irrelevant to what Homosexuals say they are, because what Homosexuals say they are as a nature, is the completely opposite to Heterosexuality and irrelevant to Bisexuality because they are connected to both sexes-(M/F). Is this a possible cause for the misconceptions and assumptions made over the Bible to give discrimination to a worldwide minority.
Does this suggest, or possibly explain the social stigma why people believe there is "No Moral Equivalence" and create natural hate regardless of religion as well as the assumptions made over the Bible to create a conditioning of prejudice on the subject. The only way to be sure is to truly understand how people look and judge others by natural perception.
Because if Bisexuals & Heterosexuals are only looking on the issue from there perspective of their own nature. They are not in any way whatsoever looking at any part of the issue objectively or logically in any true form, and intern misinterpreting a reality of things by looking at it from a single-minded point of view and nothing else. The only way to understand any truth is to look at any issue objectively from every logical and conceivable angle to obtain the facts. When a religious person knows the Bible states and explains, only the absolute truth will be Gods Judgement, shouldn't any religious person look at the subject objectively, to be absolutely sure of the truth instead of relying on what other people preach. Or is it what other people preach just confirming that single-minded point of view and naturally making a person think it is the truth by confirming natural perception, and disbelieving without question anything else. Have any Heterosexual (religious or not) ever done that on this issue?
It is a fact that the life choice theory against Homosexual’s is not just confined to religious people, as agnostics and Atheists believe exactly the same life choice theory. Why since they have no knowledge of what the Bible states on the issue for any form of personal confirmation to agree, so why do they believe exactly the same theory that it is a life choice to be that way.
Knowing that the life choice theory is not just confined to people who’s beliefs are created by religious teachings, B-F-P went to specialist psychoanalysts to get 2nd and 3rd professional opinions on the possibility of B-F-P questions within the context of B-F-P’s research, and found,
A simple mental barrier that every human being has…
Chapter 4,
The International Core Of The Problem Causing The Entire Debate.
[Professional Psychological research by B-F-P and analysis on human perception, with the help of professional and expert second and third opinions with psychobabble edited out.]
Most people will not believe anything further than what they see with their own eyes. Behaviour does not make sexuality and beyond behaviour any individual's sexuality "is not a visual state of being" like skin colour is, whether Heterosexual, Bisexual or Homosexual. Any person will make a perspective look on others by their own knowledge and experience of their lives on how they know what they are capable of within themselves as a person and within their own nature that they identify on, to make correct assumptions and judgements.
For example; Every person will subconsciously remember all passed experiences in life, even from childhood to know how they would relate to future circumstances on making the correct conscious actions & judgements by assumption or conclusion on others in relation to themselves. In term of "this" morality issue of Homosexuality, any Bisexual or Heterosexual will always subconsciously or consciously conclude the nearest logical psychological denominator of which they could, would, should or might possibly be capable of themselves, on which they naturally identify within their own inherent nature. Anything that is "not possible" within that persons inherent nature will be consciously distinguished "as alien" to their morality, and conclude the only logical denominator of possibility that they could, would, should or might be capable of.
From the perspective of “same sex driven” Bisexuals 80–95% connected to the same sex
It exactly same with a Bisexuals view of Homosexuality and Heterosexuality, as since behaviour is a choice and eternal monogamous love isn’t, and Bisexuals are inherently connected to both sexes from birth, and only understand the knowledge of their self-evident sexuality throughout their entire natural life, and do not naturally identify any inherent connection to only one gender-(M/F), leaving them to personally believe and refute that neither Homosexuality nor Heterosexuality are fixed sexuality's from birth towards only “one” sex, regardless however much the level of their inherent connection differs in Bisexuality.
As any form of such a prospect of only being connected to one sex would be an alien concept in relation to their nature. Creating a mental block in perceiving every person around them to be the same, and leaving them to believe the global human population is born with a natural drive towards both sexes that differs after adolescence & maturity to be drawn to one sex more than the other, to create what they believe to be Homosexuality or Heterosexuality by the difference of an optional choice of natural drive in one direction or the other, and believe a Bisexual to be a person who is more or less “equally” driven towards both sexes.
Also, because of the international driven social stigma by prejudice genuine Heterosexuals; that Homosexuality is a life choice to be that way, the largest percent of Bisexuals through adolescence into maturity come to understand the predominant drive for one sex more than the other, will grow up into adulthood believing that dominant drive to be the life choice they made, and basing the belief on the issue of sexual needs over being more drawn to one more than both sexes because of more enjoyed sexual and emotional feelings towards that preferred gender-(M/F) without even realising that that was actually a naturally driven inherent nature that achieved that apocalypse. The reason Bisexuals do not understand this is because explaining the inherent connection of human sexuality to another person is very hard, let alone themselves regardless of sexual needs, and since behaviour does not make sexuality and human sexuality is not a visual state of being, and no official sources have ever produced any materials for explaining it to anyone to understand it properly. Every person of any sexuality is left with no external information or choice but to judge others in relation to themselves on the issue of sexual needs.
It is exactly the same with Homosexuals, because you will find that "most Homosexuals" personally believe and feel that all Heterosexuals must be partly Homosexual, even though as far as they know within their own nature, they are mentally incapable of becoming sexually, intimately, emotionally and monogamously involved by any form of inherent connection or sexual attraction towards any person of the opposite sex, without realising the psychologically perceived contradiction to the reality of things.
No promoted material has ever been shown to contradict that understanding, of which is stopping them from looking past that perception, and if a Heterosexual or Homosexual questions that Bisexuals belief or knowledge of sexuality that Bisexual will disbelieve without question anything that does not identify with his or her nature, and will still believe the Life Choice theory without feeling the need to question it, even though it is impossible for any Bisexual to make any form of directional choice of sexuality, because you cannot make a choice on a direction from two options that were already naturally integrated, because of an inherently fixed unbalanced gradient. Many Bisexuals that believe they are now only Homosexual’s, and never contemplate calling themselves or believe themselves to be a Bisexual, and would disbelieve any verbally told, or show written inherent natural distinctions of Homosexuality or Heterosexuality with an inherent connection to only one sex. Unfortunately, these Bisexuals that believe they are Homosexuals and work in any form of entertainment media or civil rights groups as leaders that promote that expression based solely on their own belief of sexuality, will not realise that they are actually directly discriminating against Homosexuals & Heterosexuals of which not only do not identify with that belief but find such a belief that sexuality is not only a choice but pushing a presupposition that everyone chooses a preference to be that way, are completely discriminatory, harassing & dehumanising.
From the perspective of genuine Heterosexuality from birth.
Since behaviour is a choice, and eternal monogamous love isn’t and Heterosexuals are mentally incapable of such love or even sexual attraction for persons of the same sex to even come psychologically close to identifying it within their own inherent nature, they will always consciously or subconsciously conclude the nearest logical and natural denominator of which they could, would, should or might be capable of that is not part of their inherent nature, as whatever is inherent is from birth, anything else is acquired, meaning a choice. What they are not capable of inherently will only be seen as a choice, and on this issue a sexual choice, not a choice of love through an inherent connection to the same sex, as it is ultimately impossible for Heterosexuals. Leaving Heterosexual to feel no need to explore it further to realise, Heterosexual opposites where there are no personal preferences of type to achieve even any form of sexual attraction for each other, are incapable of “willingly” achieving any lifelong committed choice of existence with each other, based solely on a rare temporary arousal if and when it manifests between man and woman simultaneously to achieve any form of sexual gratification to the opposite sex, let alone the same sex.
The international religious stigma of Homosexuality being a life choice to be that way, will only be the biggest form of confirmation on any bias Heterosexual's assumption by perception based on Heterosexual nature on the issue. With this personally confirmed stigma, 100% of the average bias Heterosexual’s preconception ideals of Homosexuality will automatically be the disgusted thought of anal sex and see nothing less and nothing more. And with such a religious confirmation on a person’s own personal man made assumptions and construing it as religious belief will make them incapable and unwilling to accept any other plausible possibility, even if Homosexuality was proved 100% genetically to be fact, because one can not negate the fact that every religious person will believe that the beliefs of the many out-way the beliefs of the few;-How could the belief of the global populous be wrong? Provoking a conflict solely based on the unproven evident-less personal beliefs of prejudice individuals the larger majority who use the Bible as their foundation of (void) evidence to blanket dehumanisation and death on a minority of human beings, saying the Bible is the truth, even though the Bible actually explains to look for truth in the reality of things pertaining to this life. But every prejudice Heterosexual of every religion based on the Bible, interprets the Bible literally word for word without realising that 50 to 60% of the Bible is written in analogies and metaphors, and then they use all the sections that explain Heterosexuals should not acted against their nature with sexual needs which is punishable by death as a the founding basis of their belief on Homosexuality. Even though there is not one version of the entire Bible worldwide that carries one recorded word, sentence, parable, gospel or story on any person who actually did sexually act against their nature, that explains they ever made any form of permanent life long committed choice against their nature to that sexual act. B-F-P completely agree that a Heterosexual should not go against their nature with anything, as there would be no personally achievable natural or moral future in it; which is obviously why those sections in the Bible were written to point out.
Regardless how many bias Heterosexuals without evidence disbelieve without question what Homosexuals say they are; when a minority of human beings have been stating and campaigning for endless decades on social & human rights and legal issues like marriage, joint co-habitation rights, joint pensions, inheritance, insurances, adoption, surrogacy, schooling curriculum’s on same-sex marital love and relationships, immigration & refugee asylum protection from execution. Protection from global dehumanisation through discrimination, victimisation, harassment resulting to the degradation of mental health and European human rights court status as an inherent dignity to simply legally support an obviously opposite nature that Heterosexuals are incapable of achieving, even by choice, constitutes and qualifies an irrefutable drawn line between what the Bible states in relation to the nature of Heterosexuality, and what Homosexuals are as a minority of human beings? It is not a one-way single-minded bias perception; it is a subject just like most things that works both ways.
With this mental barrier a Bisexual would never realise a simple equation on the subject of genuine sexuality, which would help one open up and identify that mental barrier. Which is: From the Bisexual perception, “if” a Heterosexual is a person who has the same inherent connection to both sexes from childhood, but is up to 95% driven towards the opposite sex, which same sex driven Bisexuals would understand after adolescence and maturity, meaning a opposite sex driven Bisexual would still completely understand the natural drive for the same sex regardless how small that connection to the same sex is: So why is it that every bias and prejudice Heterosexual regardless of religion or politics always states that; It is abnormal, unnatural and there is no moral equivalence between Homosexuality & Heterosexuality, and demand 100% genetic proof to be inherent.
This mental barrier is not a delusional state or any form of psychological dysfunction, it is an element of self-conditioned growth of IQ in how a person tries to objectively and logically perceives others by judgement in relation to themselves. Based on what they are familiar with or used to or know by past knowledge and natural life experience. Although any person that does this, will not realise they are judging an entire people and minority by the vanity of their own self-evident nature, instead of objectively and logically seeing or believing the other persons or peoples stated and demonstrated self-evident & obvious nature. Which logically Homosexuality would be the complete and total opposite nature to Heterosexuality, so to base any judgement in relation to Heterosexuality by a Heterosexual, would be irrelevant.
The disgust of lesbianism is very small because the largest percent of Heterosexual men are sexually aroused by the idea of two women together sexually, which is what creates the international media hypocrisy and fascism and shows the single-minded point of view of Heterosexual men. Whether Homosexuality is a true sexuality, or not, what Homosexuals and civil right groups states, campaigns and demonstrates they are, is a complete opposite nature to Heterosexuality, making such subject matter irrelevant to the view of Heterosexual opposite sex attraction. So the prospect of any Bisexual or Heterosexual judging Homosexuality should look at the issue objectively but very few do, and that's why most people believe in the life choice theory whether they believe its wrong or write to make such life choice to be that way. And why nobody has realised, that if one was to take an intelligent logical look at the life choice theory itself, it would never make any logical sense in relation to the confines of human sexuality or the confined nature of Heterosexuality. For decades bias Politicians and religious persons have tried to explain Homosexuality to be Heterosexuals with a confused emotional sexual need for the same sex.
But in relation to the genuine Heterosexual perspective, "If" all Homosexuals & Bisexuals actually were Heterosexuals, it would be completely logical to assume it to be a confused sexually driven emotional state for the same sex. But, There's a missing link to that hypothesis that has never been objectively or logically surmised. [:-What ever is possible has a likely standpoint to be proved impossible, but whatever has been proved “not impossible”, has the most plausible standpoint to be the most likely truth and fact.] The inherent connection of Heterosexuality or Bisexuality to the opposite sex is something you cannot remove, you cannot turn it off, or simply eradicate it, or even ignore it, or work against it, even if a Bisexual is 95% driven towards the same sex. So if Homosexuality is a conditioning or choice, it doesn't explain in anyway whatsoever why every genuine Homosexual worldwide in every so-called civilised country and indirectly connected, explain, demonstrate and state they never have been, and never will be capable of feeling for or falling in love with any person of the opposite, sex which is something completely and ultimately impossible for a Heterosexual or Bisexual to achieve, even by choice.
Leaving the question: Is it “Impossible” some people are born inherently different to others?
No psychological manipulation or circumstance in life could ever possibly make an entire worldwide minority of Heterosexuals or Bisexuals incapable of being inherently connected to the opposite sex to achieve any state of mind that does not understand what it must feel like to be inherently connected to the opposite sex to know that one might or might mot fall in love that way. So why believe it is a choice?
By the life choice "theory", which all bias Heterosexuals & Bisexual believe in, completely supports this insane theory, that makes Heterosexuality as a genuine naturally inherent sexuality to “only” the opposite sex and Bisexuality to both sexes to be completely unnatural flawed & corruptible. But yet, you will not find one Heterosexual that believes the nature of Heterosexuality is corruptible, and the reason why is because their right, it isn't. But they will still blindly believe the life choice theory without question or even feeling the need to examine it. If a person that judges others by their own nature, is incapable of personally identifying something that is naturally alien to them, they will come to the nearest natural logical denominator based any conclusions on their self-evident knowledge of their nature, and will never naturally feel any need to look past the first conclusion based on that nature. And in doing so, their mind will never objectively offer any other personal self evident logical questions, to further surmise any other conclusions.
The only way for a person to allow them self to get past the first conclusion, is for that conclusion to be logically and identifiably contradicted, which will open & identify that mental barrier. Unfortunately no material exists to achieve that. If there was, once identified the mind will naturally offer itself other objective logical questions of possibilities, to surmise other theories and conclusions. If any bias Heterosexual or Bisexual that believes in the life choice theory were to think logically about other possibilities of Homosexuality, they would have asked themselves the most simplest, plausible logical questions. Because without looking at any subject matter and judging it in relation to oneself knowing this single-minded perception, you would realise that you not only have absolutely no external information whatsoever to base any form of genuine conclusion on the absolute truth, no physical scientific evidence or proof exists to justify such beliefs. Which intern, if realised, it would leave one with no choice but to look for the truth and not perceive it.
Unless that person finds it easier to base their truth on perception, because looking for the truth is harder and contradicts popular belief, which intern, induces and conditions common misconceptions and stigmas which institutes discrimination and victimisation through national dehumanisation to such a depth that very few could possibly fathom the consequences, even to the point of irreversibility. Has anyone realised a mind-boggling fact that exists, that there is not and never has been one scientific institution in the history of the planet that ever proved Homosexuality was a choice in the first place to confirm such beliefs, leaving a simple: where do these beliefs come from, considering they are not confined to people who understand and believe religious teachings. A person will not blindly disbelieve the issue if it involves a close person, i.e.; family and friends or if it is explained to them through any teaching media. It is very well known that many parents disown and deliberately physically abuse their children because they cannot accept them for what they are. This is also contributed to by many fathers who refuse to believe that such a nature to feel only for the same sex could ever possibly be genetically and inherently born from them. And inducing the firm belief over pride against their own child of an unnatural affliction and believe their child is living a life of self-delusion over emotional & sexual needs, and will believe he knows more on the subject than his own child. This also explains the realistic persona of the hate, stigma and tolerance towards Homosexuals regardless of whether Homosexuality is a choice or not, and whether or not the aggressor is religious. It is a fact of life that anything inherently natural is from birth, and anything else just like Religion or any profound divine influence or behaviour, is acquired, meaning a choice.
This morality issue by Heterosexuals that don’t understand Homosexuality regardless of religion is a humanism perception, the same as Bisexuals prejudice views of hate because of their own prejudice single-minded view of Heterosexuality. Just like most things, prejudice and discrimination works both ways, and it is very likely that the 99.99% of the LGBT community actually have no true understanding of why every government religion & Heterosexual society works against them. It would never cross a Bisexual or Homosexual's mind that the prejudice minority of Heterosexual society believe Homosexuals are all Heterosexuals with an abnormal affliction for sexual needs with nothing to do with love. From a Homosexual’s point of view to assume such a prospect would be ludicrous and impossible for Heterosexual society to be that blindly deluded. Very few people in society hate purely for the sake of hating; prejudice and hate just like most things works both ways and will always have a personal reason, but will almost always be, a form of confirmation on a personal bias assumption, and if the largest percent of society states what you believe is right; does that necessarily mean you are?
Bias Heterosexual Politicians that write law and legislation based on the issue of LGBT community, will always write these legislations in the language of the Heterosexual perspective, and base it on that; this is the life choice theory language, making it hard for civil rights activists to realise the full implications that are written into legislations for law. Unless you know what language to look for in it’s writing that is based on the life choice theory, by people believing mankind is a totally Heterosexual race, where by some, have affliction of sexual needs to the same sex. Which explains why a bias Heterosexual state: It is abnormal, unnatural and there is no moral equivalence between Homosexuality & Heterosexuality, regardless of religion. There is no point fighting against prejudice & hate if you don’t understand why it's there. Unless you understand that reason and fight against that reason, you might as well bang you're head up against a brick wall as you’ll never win, because you can not fight fire with fire, you must find the core of the problem creating it to understand why it is burning.
Revealing the core of the problem to the entire international debate over the issue of Homosexuality is that between Heterosexuals, Bisexuals and Homosexuals, there is three separate distinctive natural perceptions, that from the perspective of one of these inherent natures, one will only see life from a complete different perspective than the others, and will only make decisions based on that perspective. Which explains why the largest percent of Heterosexual society believes Homosexuality is an unnatural choice of sex and not an inherent dignity or true sexuality. The same as Bisexuals will believe they are Homosexual and disbelieve that neither Homosexual or Heterosexuality are inherent sexualities to only one gender-(M/F). It also explains what is stopping the largest percent of the LGBT community from having any idea of the reason why society, religion and government will continually refuse and deny Homosexuals the desperately needed rights and laws they fight for. Though these perceptions demonstrates why many Homosexuals and Bisexuals are confused as to why there is such a diverse difference in natural attractions of gender, but are incapable of truly explaining it to themselves, and are only hypothesising on the reality of how things would, could, should or might be.
But this also creates a danger within civil right groups over the fight for civil rights, as many of these groups will also be saturated with same sex driven Bisexuals working at the top levels, and they will never realise the danger their ideals of reality on sexuality causes when bias Heterosexuals believe Homosexuality is a choice to act against them, and these Bisexuals will be confirming every bias perception of the opposition with every action that construes any political argument over sexuality as a Sexual preference (Which means: sexual behaviour towards a preferred gender), because these LGBT group leaders will naturally believe that everyone is inherently connected to both sexes. Leaving bias genuine Heterosexual politicians with a view of the LGBT community as a minority based on an optional existence to either live a moral way or to live an immoral legally restricted way, whether these Heterosexuals believe its wrong or OK to be that way. Any Homosexual or Bisexual reading this that knows or understands the reading of legislation will now find that if they read any legislation again they’ve known, it will read completely differently than it did before, regardless of years of experience, because this mental barrier of perception has a draw back of stopping you and diverting you from seeing the reality of things, even in written word. Written legislations by bias politicians will write law from that perspective only. When the EU court of Human Rights or any court of law or bias Politicians, judges or jury’s, will only see and understand and use law from that Heterosexual perspective when civil rights fight them for their rights, so to succeed in that, one must understand that perspective. Any teachers national unions that accept support from LGBT community advisory groups on education curriculum materials will also be looking at it from their own perspective. Because of the "social stigma" that Homosexuality is a life choice, many Bisexuals believe they have made such a life choice as they preferred the same sex, and believe they are a Homosexuals that were once a Heterosexuals and never believe they are Bisexuals. And in believing that, some religious same sex driven Bisexuals have been found to have now gone to special psychotherapy reversion to revert back to what they believe to be Heterosexuality. And in doing so, it has been known that such psychotherapy has successfully made them more preferable to the opposite sex, but also making them believe they are now Heterosexual again, when in fact they are not.
This therapy does not work on Heterosexuals or Homosexuals, as they inherently fixed sexuality's by an inherent connection to only "one sex" not two to perpetuate any differential, making such manipulative therapy impossible for many. Many religious Heterosexuals believe Homosexuality can be eradicated by such therapy because of this common misconception brought about by confused Bisexuals.
But if any religious person believed Homosexuality was not a choice in relation to this therapy they would be believing that an inherent sexuality to only one gender-(M/F) like Heterosexuality to be completely corruptible through mental manipulation. So many Bisexuals that called themselves Homosexuals that have been changed by such psychotherapy now call them Heterosexuals and ex-gays. Which has induced, indorsed and justified the religious and political belief that Homosexuality is life choice, even if science proved Homosexuality to be 100% genetically naturally inherent, and regardless that science never proved it was a choice in the first place to have any genuinely justified legal need to spend endless tax payers money on proving an existence of an already existing minority that Heterosexuals and Bisexuals are ultimately incapable of achieving even by choice. If the LGBT community and its rights groups are confusing themselves over what Homosexuality or sexuality is, then how do they ever expect Heterosexual society to understand what Homosexuality is to gain any form of civil laws to the fullest extent. It is fact that Heterosexual society has no true idea what Homosexuality actually is, and as it would seem, neither does the LGBT community public & lobby group leaders. In many cases national distinctions to justify inherent dignity can be discriminatory, but in this case, a distinction must be made!
National statistics like to speculate that 1 in every 10 people are gay, and since the UK population is around 62 million, that makes the LGBT community to be around 10%, meaning more or less around 6.2million. The belief systems of every minority has been so constitutionally integrated, is it irreversible?
Population Statistics On Genuine Natures And Statistics Of Bias Beliefs In Relation to Them
| LGBT minority 6.2 Million | (UK Population 62 Million) Opposite sex driven Bisexuals & Genuine Heterosexuals 56.Million|
[Same sex driven Bisexuals are saturating the civil rights system, and have been since the fight for equality began. But the fight for equality has been based on the premise of Bisexual belief, that the oppression is from a so-called Heterosexual society that chose to be straight and refuse civil rights on premise that Heterosexual sex is more superior because of a socially, legally, morally and religiously supported left turn in life instead of an immoral right turn. LGBT rights groups for the past forty years, because this belief, have been voicing that the oppression from Heterosexual society is a sexual apartheid; when the true fight for equality is a completely different ball game]
Many LGBT rights groups might argue against B-F-P on pushing an agenda against Bisexuals who believe they are Homosexuals as discriminatory to their personal beliefs to accept themselves as Bisexuals not Homosexuals and that the oppression is not a sexual apartheid. But this belief is equally as bias, prejudice and damaging to Homosexuals, as the Heterosexual belief over Homosexuality as a life choice of sex with nothing to do with characteristics of inherent dignity. Which LGBT civil rights groups feel justified in fighting against this bias Heterosexual belief system, even though this fight for equality is equally as discriminatory against Heterosexuals personal belief’s over others in believing it is a choice.
So to argue that its OK for one to fight to change the Heterosexual belief system, but wrong to fight against Bisexuals who believe they’re Homosexuals who create equally as much damage, would be unjustified colonial hypocrisy and fascism. The freedom of natural life of a human minority from physical and mental degradation through destructive dehumanisation, is fundamentally more important than any majority’s idealism’s, which one assumes the LGBT community have been fighting for rights based on that premise.
["Tolerance" is forced acknowledgement & acceptance without any true form of understanding, and the only way to truly understand anything, is to ask questions.]
Arthur Conan Doyle : Sherlock Holmes
Anything is possible until it is proven without a doubt to be impossible.
If you eliminate the “impossible”, you're left only with what ”is plausible".
Then by exploring the most possible, how ever improbable,
Will always reveal the truth.
The meaning of Philosophy;
1, The use of reason & argument in seeking truth and knowledge of reality; esp. of the causes and nature of things and of the principle's governing existence, the material universe, perception's of physical phenomena and human behaviour.
2, a) A system "or" set of beliefs, reached by this process.
[ Middle English from Old French filosofie via Latin Philosophia;-"Wisdom" from Greek (as Philosophos;- "Wise.").
Whether Homosexuality “is a choice, or not” every Church on the planet states; it is against God, Christ and the Bible to segregate who does and does not apply to being part of religion, the scriptures and God laws and under Christ, because to do so would contradict the founding principle of Biblical prophesy. Which Biblical prophesy means and explains that God, Christ, the Bible and the scriptures “is for everyone”, which mean “it is for everyone”. Otherwise through separatism, idealism, prejudice, hate and segregation of others, even if you segregate your self from others over ideals of self superiority; You make it meaningless!
But then every religion based on the Bible prejudicially segregates every man, woman and child of the global LGBT community from ever being morally part of "or" involved in any religious denomination based on the Bible, and then uses them as target of evil to condition the rest of the global prejudice individuals in society to load their moral separatist gun against, with an ammunition of personal preferences over an idealism based of self-superiority, and then conditions them to fire, calling it religious belief, Not Hate!
When looking for the obvious logical facts and truths on, does one necessarily need DNA and genetic research to prove 100% an obvious logical point or fact of nature?
The distinction above is the true factual meaning of philosophy, and if the worlds prejudice populous haven’t just simply judged the entire issue in relation to their natures over the past 2000 years, “what was it” that Heterosexuals, Bisexuals, the governments, global institutions, global society and every religion and churches theology, sophistry, doctrine’s and interpretations and beliefs based on that brought them to any form of conclusion that Homosexuality is a life choice of sexual needs to be that way?
What ever happened to common sense?
(b) Human Morality
Human morality is an inherent vain state of mind & feeling that every human being has, that help's a person psychologically define themselves as moral & humane irrelevant to religion. Which controls and determines a person's own belief of reality within the life growth of knowledge, experience and understanding of ones own life, confined by their-own natural humanity and nature. This determines the control of ones own beliefs on what is write and wrong, what is dangerous and safe, also how to distinguish between what is permanently mentally beneficial, "and" physical and material needs and wants, within the belief of objective actions, assumptions, conclusions and judgements on others in relation to themselves. By this humanism psychological perception defines how one sees how others should treat or protect others, whether good or bad in relation to themselves. When all these things are acted on, they determine and interpret the integrity, principles and the character of a person by their morality of thought…
The perception of others in relation to oneself has always been mankind’s greatest downfall. As 99.99% of mankind has a habit of perceiving the absolute worst in people, just over the small things like suspicion without the slightest proof or evidence and will also believe that what they believe, is 100% conclusive… Humanism: Whether it is a choice or not, the life choice theory is the founding perception that Heterosexuals believe in against Homosexuality regardless of religion to make any true distinction on the subject that leaves the conclusions that have been made in relation to the founding interpretation of the Bible. It is a humanism perception, which is the natural perception of others in relation to themselves on common moral human matters, regardless of religion.
The official meaning off, "HUMANISM"; 1a, An outlook or system of thought, concerned with human matters rather than or without religious, divine or supernatural perceptions.
2a A Personal theory, perception or outlook emphasizing common needs and seeking solely rational ways of solving human problems, and concerned with humankind as responsible and progressive intellectual beings.
Humanism means a natural state of mind about material perception of how a person draws personal conclusions and opinions on other people around them in relation to themselves based on the human morality of acceptable and common conduct of behaviour, actions, self & exterior preservational material matters. That interprets the integrity & character of themselves and others. Which is identical and goes hand in hand with the natural human characteristic called "human morality" which is an inherent state of mind that every human being on the planet has. Whether Homosexuality is a choice or not, it is this Humanism perception of Heterosexual bias without seeing the issue objectively, that is the founding cause of the Stigma, tolerance and the life choice to be that way theory with or without religion to guide it. The whole issue of Homosexuality through Government guided by religion against civil rights for Homosexuals has been on the belief that Homosexuality is an act, a practice, a life choice vice of sexual behaviour by innately born Heterosexuals. Everyone that condemns Homosexuals, believe it is a choice and feel justified by religion in their actions. Has anyone considered what damage they might be causing if they’re wrong. Whatever sexuality you are, can you divorce yourself from the subject, and only look at the issue logically and objectively from every conceivable angle to really say you know the truth or have ever truly looked for it.
Chapter 5,
Consequences Of The Same Sex Driven Bisexual Who Control LGBT Campaign Groups
Can any rights groups or institution really be sure what materials are needed to be taught on sexuality in schools to all children regardless of sexuality.
(a) Promoting Schooling Education Materials From The Bisexual Perspective.
The promotion of educational materials for schools on the issue of Homosexuality and sexuality is at the top of many LGBT group’s interests at present. Unfortunately, they are combating each others agendas over what exactly the materials are, that should taught in schools to all children regardless of sexuality without being able to come to any form of conclusions. But there is another aspect that has caused this draw back on LGBT groups coming to any unanimous decision on what materials should taught, and this draw back is the LGBT group leaders who believe Homosexuality is a choice, or be more precise, Bisexuals who believe their Homosexuals who made such a choice, and are trying to design, write and look for educational materials based solely on that form of belief of sexuality to legitimise to children and are refuting materials that promote Homosexuality as an inherent dignity. This is a seriously dangerous ground, that such people attempting to produce any such materials that construe human sexuality as a sexual preference meaning an optional choice of behaviour, do not realise or are even aware of any dangers to surmise a possible outcome of consequences. And any consequences will be on Heterosexual & Homosexual children as the only children to identify with such materials are Bisexual children. The whole point of the need for such materials is not only so Homosexual and Bisexual children have some form of guidance to understand that what they are is normal and natural, it is also imperative that Heterosexual children understand what Homosexuality & Bisexuality is about to contradict the prejudice of a stigma, which would intern reduce the hateful bullying from Heterosexual children who will naturally perceive Homosexuality the same way prejudice adults perceive Homosexuality.
(b) Heterosexual Parents Perspective On Such Education Materials.
From a bias and prejudice Heterosexual parents point of view do not only believe Homosexuality is a choice to be that way, they believe no materials whatsoever should be legitimised and taught to children on the issue of Homosexuality because if they believe it is a choice to be that way, it can be acquired, and if it can be acquired, they dare not allow any form of materials on such lifestyles to be taught to their children as normal and acceptable. Because if a parent believes Homosexuality is acquired, you would have to be something else first, creating a fear that their perspective Heterosexual child may decide to make such a life choice to be that way against their genuine inherent nature. And if the LGBT groups promote the teaching of educational materials designed from the Bisexual perspective, then these actually confirm the bias and prejudice beliefs on the subject that would cause uproars between parents, schools and even the government & church.
Very few people actually know, that this was the exact same core of the problem in 1987, when the London borough of Haringey lesbian & gay unit wrote to all local authority maintained school governing heads, on campaigning for them to promote a positive image of Homosexuality as normal & OK to be that way in schools to pupils in the attempt to reduce homophobic bullying and give some form of supporting guidance to young Homosexuals in schools from indirect & direct discrimination. Unfortunately a massive whirlwind trailing back to government was induced, invoked & created. The Ecclesiastical Committee guided by the General Synod put forward a Church of England measure through government to all politicians for an amendment into a local government Bill outlawing any education, teaching or promotion on Homosexual relationships in any public maintained, private, nursery and religious schools as normal genuine family relationships and with this amendment written by MP Michael Howard, legally classified any such relationship as pretend in The Local Government Act1988, with a new amendment section 2a, subsection 1 Clause (a)-(b) in Section 28 of the Local Authority Act 1986 (c 10.)
Prohibition on promoting Homosexuality by teaching or by publishing material.
2A. (1) A local authority shall not;
(a) Intentionally promote Homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting Homosexuality.
(b) Promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of Homosexuality as a pretend family relationship.
2) Nothing in subsection (1) above shall be taken to prohibit the doing of anything for the purpose of treating or preventing the spread of disease.
Although Clause 2a, 2) was a National Health Service overriding protocol allowing the teaching of sex education on the subject to prevent STD’s regardless how any teacher would teach it, because the NHS has that power over government on any possible health risks to the general public that could be reduced. This power is given to the NHS through the European Declaration of Human rights as a national security of public Health in the National Health Service Act 1977. So Section 28 allowed the teaching of sexual education on the subject, but criminalized any teaching of genuine loving Homosexual relationships, and classed them as pretend. But that was then, and this is now, because right groups have also missed one major mistake in their belief of what materials should be taught in schools to children…
(c) Discriminating Against Homosexual & Heterosexual Children With Life Choice
If rights groups actually manage to design materials for schools in teaching Homosexuality or any sexuality as normal and acceptable choice in life, they would be discriminating against every Heterosexual and Homosexual child that is witness to, because they will identify with such materials and will without a doubt find it offensive and discriminatory in being subjected to it. But Homosexual children will be the worst of in witnessing any form of such materials because it is hard enough for them to cope with discrimination and harassment through bullying and prejudice view from Heterosexual society without having their own perspective minority pushing these victimising materials on them. Although the chances of these materials reaching schools is very slim, because;-
(d) Rejected Materials From Health and Education Authorities:
If any materials designed and written by state official authority’s associated to the LGBT groups and their leaders on the prospect that sexuality is a sexual preference of choice that may imply the inclusion of Heterosexuality, no parent or school system would ever allow such materials to enter schools and be legitimised to children. No parent or teacher let alone the children, would ever identify with such materials and would immediately find them offensive and discriminatory to the moral values of the inherent dignity of Heterosexual society regardless of religion, and these materials will without a doubt, be rejected.
(e) Bisexuals Unknowingly Discriminating against Homosexuals and Heterosexuals Through the Political Agenda, Education Reform and Social Scene.
The LGBT community social scene has been conditioning sex on to its own minority for the past three decades but the social scene reached a social peak in the very late 1990’s and since then the social LGBT public has levelled and have now started to slowly reduce. This has caused confusion as to why, which has been expressed through the social scene lifestyle guides like QX, Boys Magazine and the Pink-Paper. The social scene was always advertised as a socio-sex-environment but over the past ten years the promotion of Homosexuality as a lifestyle of an optional existence based solely on sex with no promoted aspects or images of monogamous love to contradict it has unknowingly caused offence and discrimination to many genuine Homosexuals who are making every attempt to push themselves away for the social scene, because the social environment never promoted what genuine Homosexuals believe they are. And when rights groups fight for rights and get nowhere it is a cause for concern as these genuine Homosexuals identify a link between these problems and the fight for civil rights and are unable to explain it to themselves. When government & official LGBT advisory groups promote the need for education on Homosexuality there is endless confusion and contradiction as to what is needed to be taught between both parties and neither parties seem to come to any conclusion as to what is causing the contradiction of the agendas.
(f) Conclusion (Catch 22):
When any rights groups or advisory groups support or promote any government legal proposals or decisions that promote or construe the LGBT community as an optional sexual preference regardless whether they believe it is OK to make such a life choice to be that way, they themselves directly discriminate against and victimise Homosexuals. The only answer is to work from one end of the spectrum of sexuality on truly understanding what exactly genuine Homosexuals would need to gain a healthy childhood mental growth on life from schooling materials on true inherent dignity. If one could achieve that, then one would simultaneously fulfil all schooling material needs for Bisexual children, which will automatically induce the eradication of prejudice perceptions from Heterosexual Children and intern remove the homophobic bullying. But what exactly do Homosexual children need to be taught to them in schools that Bisexual LGBT civil rights & advisory group leaders are not realising. If Bisexuals are confusing themselves as to what sexuality actually is and they believe it is a choice; and Heterosexuals believe Homosexuals are incapable of eternal monogamous love for the same sex through a life choice of sexual behaviour; and parents do not know or understand what to teach their children in relation to encompassing the understanding and identification of their child’s sexuality for a healthy mental growth and to teach their children to reframe from prejudice views on others; and the LGBT rights groups are arguing & confusing each other over what education materials should be promoted to children on sexuality; and the government are refusing most things the LGBT civil rights groups fight for, because of the promotion of an optional sexual preference; and aspects of what Bisexuals who believe they are Homosexuals promote through politics and the social scene and every form of gay national media on what prejudice society sees and believes it is, only confirms the worst perceptions of the prejudice and political confusion to act against them as well as loosing support from genuine Homosexuals who understand their own sexuality; Then all these things have developed a paradox of mutually conflicting and dependant conditions, that create a catalyst of endlessly looping dilemmas and circumstances of which there is no escape. Or to be precise the biggest catch 22 and 36o degree fight against oppression of which neither side of the entire controversial debate know the cause or core of the problem that created it, the situation sustaining it, or understand any genuine reality of truth to work out any form of conclusion to resolve it.
Chapter 6,
Understanding What Materials Really Are Needed To Be Taught In Schools To Children.
An anomaly
Society like to emulate that the rough population statistics of the Homosexual population is about 10% of the UK population, as institutions have stated that around 1 in every 10 people are gay. The population of the UK is almost 62 million, so that means that the UK LGBT community population would be roughly around 6.2 million. Global statistics of suicide rates in young children between the ages of 10–20, have been calculated in so-called civilised countries to be in the thousands per year, and mostly between 3 to 4 thousand yearly and on occasions up to 7 thousand, but this statistic has brought with it a serious dilemma. If the LGBT community are roughly only 10 percent of the population, why are official reported suicide statistics, reporting that “over half” of all suicide rates of young children and teenagers are sexuality related…
That qualifies as a serious problem and a mysterious one, as for years health institutions and Universities have been trying to help lobby groups find the core of the problem as to why the largest percent of Homosexuals have the highest rate of mental stress syndromes and suicide rates globally. Unfortunately these institutional research findings have been obtained by seriously flawed research basis, no matter how expertly they were done, that no one has realised, because of a major factor that has been completely missed in all global researches done to find the core of the problem. The basis of all professional national and international research institutions have done to find the core problem was conducted by examining the social scene of the LGBT community, and basing it materials on measuring sexual behaviour and sexual needs. This next extensive piece contains the B-F-P’s findings to the core of the problem of all suicide rates and global mental stress syndromes in Homosexuals, and you may find it disturbing. Because the missing factor to the core of the problem, was not any aspects of the LGBT community’s social sex scene environment or the measuring any form of sexual behaviour.
(a) A True Perspective of the Homosexual Social Scene.
Brief history: In the sixties when what is perceived as Homosexuality was illegal, there was very little of what could be called, any kind of social scene. As it consisted of just a few bars and little in the way of clubs, which were mainly underground, and were always monitored by the police. After being a Homosexual, was legalised at the end of the sixties, it gave Homosexuals a new lease of life, even though the age of consent was at 21. The hidden private aspects of London Soho threw its doors open for the first time, with every intention of expansion with the help and acknowledgement of community activism. Between 1970 and 1980, it was a slow growth to bring many social venues into the light for its public until the 80's. As the eighties continued, the social scene of the LGBT community's clubs & bars in the west end grew exponentially, as did the capacity of age groups finding that social scene were getting younger & younger. With that decade, came two main stream social guides magazines, created to advertise the social standing and the ever growing social scene, Pink Paper & Boyz and later QX. As the social scene expanded, it grew through the nineties it reached its growth peak between 1995-97 even though the LGBT public using the scene still has a never-ending growth, and that public finding the scene, are still getting younger and younger, even down to the ages of 13 to 15…
The Truth: If anyone were to believe that the Heterosexual social scene is summarily the same as the LGBT community's, you would be seriously mistaken. This can be easily seen in how they present themselves as a people and how they interact with each other as a minority. The social scene of the LGBT community, has been built and founded, over the past 30 years, on what sells the most, SEX… Not only that, it is the only social scene that openly and nationally advertises, promotes, and endorses it to its young and its general public with every single avenue to obtain it, without any restriction or avenues to contradict it, and to the point where the largest majority of Homosexual's & Bisexuals lives have become a lifestyle and not just an aspect of their sexuality. The promotion of sex became apparent in the beginning of the seventies and expanded to such a degree and speed, every bar & club became an advertised and promoted avenue to finding "sexual partners". Within the 80's - early 90's many bar's & Clubs promoted sexual conduct on these premises with dark rooms, mazes, cubicle's and toilets. And also within these venues, varying ways of helping its public find temporary sexual partners.
For example "Find a man" Number tagging, where the general public have a numbered stickers placed on them as they enter the premises, which they can check their number on a message board in the premises, where other patrons place messages next to the number on the board of the person wearing that number, in hope of reciprocation. "Underwear nights" in clubs, where the interiors are deliberately kept in the dark, making the prospective patrons, more aroused in blindly finding temporary sexual partners. "Gay Foam party nights". Advertised to get patrons to undress and blindly find a sexual partner in a blinding tower of foam, either semi or fully naked. From 1999 "Text sex nights" along the same principles as number tagging, but using mobile phones instead and large projector screens with text replies.
As the nineties continued the sexual conduct within bars & clubs slowly became restricted and the promotion of such things were equally reduced, except something new grew from it… Sauna's: Gay saunas have expanded throughout London, some are part of commercial chains. But all have been specifically built for the use of something irrelevant to its practical name and advertised to its public as that irrelevant use as a place to find and have sex in these saunas. Built with a plethora of endless private cubicles, mazes, dark rooms, glory wholes & video porn rooms. Although it is not illegal to advertise all these sexual activity uses, it is illegal for the public to commit sexual activities on the premises. The premises owners know that fact, and promote the illegality of sexual activity on such premises with police warning notices that are placed on the internal walls; right next to the free lubrication and condom dispensers.
Many people don’t know that none of these premises are legally licensed sex houses, they are only licensed as legitimate saunas and believe it or not, most of them are owned by Heterosexual proprietors. Something that has always existed is "Cottaging grounds in toilets & parks", and for decades even before any social scene Homosexuals have found toilets and parks as a way to find and express themselves sexually, and "none of these places are where Homosexuals go to find permanent partners," and even if some did it is very likely that they won't find them. Many of these place are well known to the LGBT community for their use of them, but it is because of that, national media and the local health councils are also aware of them and for some strange reason, promote it further, for example in Hampstead Heath by placing condom dispensers on trees. Yes its true! The advertising and promotion of the social scene comes in many forms, e.g. Flyers for all types of venues within the LGBT community's social scene from clubs, bars, to restaurants and sauna's. But the main bulk of advertisements on all the LGBT community's social scene has to offer, comes in the form of freebie scene guide magazines, E.g. QX / BOYZ. These magazines promote and advertise all the types of venues and establishments with those venues own pornographic promotions and flyers inside these magazines on what they offer. What most of these venues and establishments offer is advertised in the inviting style of pornography & homo-erotica, and that is without the promotion of prostitution that exists in the back of these magazines.
Many Gay media promoters would condemn the use of the word prostitute and call them male escorts, but it doesn’t matter how much sugar one sprinkles on the subject it is still prostitution. The magazines promote themselves with pornography and homo-erotica and arrogant feminine and childish attitudes within its editorial writing and imagery. These national Gay magazine freebies also directly promote the social lifestyle stigma of the choice theory to its own in every way, that the LGBT community as a whole and as a people of their own, is a lifestyle whose soul purpose is a sexual based life to find sex, and nothing more and nothing less. It gives every conceivable commercial style, attitude, prospective way and avenue the LGBT community as a whole "can obtain it " without reservation, and it offers absolutely nothing else, or even a single image to contradict any prospect of any outside general public seeing the LGBT community as a lifestyle life choice of sexual behaviour to be that way.
(b) Flawed Government funded research on HIV& Aids
In the beginning of the 80's, as Aids became an exponential growing threat, professor Tony Coxon of gay men's sexuality research merged forces with Dr Peter Davies at the University of Wales in Cardiff. They created a postal questionnaire on Gay men's sexual behaviour via Gay news conducted by Dr Tom McManus, then of the Kings collage hospital and Dr Marian McEnvoy an epidemiologist at the PHLS (Public Health laboratory Service) Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre at Colindale. With the advent of aids the researching focus turned to establishing norms of and changes in gay men's sexual behaviour, under the impact of the HIV Virus. The project became a longitudinal study of sexual and social lifestyles of Homosexual and Bisexual men in England & Wales. It was one of the largest cohort studies in Europe and the only study in the UK to have emerged from the LGBT community. This project was funded from the Medical Research Council and the Government department of Health for this newly formed project, which began in 1987 to July 1994 and then continued until 2002. This project was called (Socio-Sexual Investigations Of Gay Men & Aids) Or in short;- The SIGMA PROJECT.
Since 1994 the original project has regrouped with two different academic centres. Sigma Research (London) which has now become the leading social research group, specialising in the policy of aspects & HIV & AIDS. Project Sigma Essex, has researchers at the University of Essex and the Royal London Hospitals, with the main research focused on behavioural and socio-epidemiological research (Funded by the Department of Health and the Economical & Social research council).
During the last 8 years they have undertaken more than forty research and development projects concerned with the impact of HIV on sexual and social lives, on a variety of populations. The report instruments were supposedly empirical investigations in subsequent stages based on several main area's; 1) Descriptive accounts of relationships. 2) The sexual behaviour inventory. 3) Sexual lifestyles. 4) Sexual health (Diaries). I researched the Sigma Project’s research results through what there is available of them, and found something very interesting. The main questionnaire to gain the individuals of which the research was to be based, "was to find persons predominantly sexually active". The research findings of the Sigma Project showed the statistics they were researching for, were to find 1) An origin of why so many Homosexuals are catching HIV & Aids. 2) A statistical analysis, of links between social environments & sexual behaviour. 3) Statistic idea of how many Homosexuals & Bisexuals are in society. Within the research was a ulterior motive to find and cause of Homosexuality by way of inherent or non-inherent by statistical analysis. Within the Project Sigma's findings it changed its references of Homosexuality to (men who have sex with men), over a finding of differences in types of gay men within its research, that believed themselves to be Homosexuals, but 60 % said they had sexual relationships in their youth with the opposite sex, and 12% had also had sexual experience with persons of the opposite sex only a year before and called themselves Homosexuals. They stated that most men who have sex with other men spent a majority of time within the gay social sex environment which were finding it almost impossible find a relationship, let alone keep a relationship. The findings of sexual behaviour statistics; was that most men on average have been found to have 8-10 sexual sessions with other men a month. The conclusion the researchers came to, was a link due to the demographic sex-socio-environment they had placed themselves in, as the Sigma Projects statistics within a Heterosexual sex socio-environment are substantially & demographically lower, which also showed that Heterosexuals base their relationships on a more founded concept of monogamy & love, and the prospective majority look for love as well as sex, and that Heterosexual society promotes such materials and conditioning for them to do so, and within any community of people, it would be an expected norm. And yet, the researchers of the Sigma project never bother to research if why any such materials within the LGBT community social environment were not openly available, or if such material conditioning even exists.
The Sigma project is 85% correct on statistics of persons catching sexually transmitted diseases. But the entire SIGMA PROJECT is fundamentally flawed by the founding basis of its main investigation material. They believed they routed Homosexuality to socio-sex environment cause, even though they pointed out a difference between Heterosexual relationship stability and understanding of monogamy in relation to Homosexuality, but they did not bother to research that further.
If they had, they would have found its true cause as to why over the past 35 years so many men have been catching HIV & Aids why so exponentially, and what should have been the founding basis of research of the entire Sigma project. The Sigma Project was mainly to discover how & why so many Homosexuals were catching HIV & Aids. If they researched Heterosexuality and what Heterosexuals actually have, in relation to Homosexuals, they would have discovered something amazingly different to what each minority have and how they have it and who is responsible for it. Because for decades, civil rights for Homosexuals have been trying to find “the core of the problem” as to why the largest percent of Homosexual suffer from serious mental stress syndromes, on a level substantially higher than Heterosexuals suffer.
B-F-P has found that the core problem to be irrelevant to the social scene or sexual behaviour issues…
Any professional institution regardless of status to conducting scientific research studies, must be conducted by looking at any subject matter from every logical and conceivable angle and to look at each angle separately and thoroughly to obtain any true results in concluding any genuine research findings…
This leaves a question;
When any professional national or international research studies on the issue of Homosexuality and or Bisexuality were done, did any of them ever look past the issue of sexual behaviour, or perceive any possible aspects of consequences on a minority in relation to the entire subject “If” Homosexuality & Bisexuality is an inherent nature????
B-F-P has researched and found the answer in relation to that question; which is; Not one national or international research institution regardless of status ever did, and that includes the SIGMA PROJECT!!!!
So, B-F-P has done an academic case study on the issue!
(c) The core conditioning at the heart of Heterosexual Society.
At the heart of Heterosexual society is the international conditioning from childhood on principles, standards, values, integrity & character on understanding what is important in life on relationships, monogamy, marriage, lifelong commitments, the differences between right & wrong of others in relation to themselves specifically to do with a Heterosexual connection to opposite sexes. This conditioning starts from childhood and the reason for this as most things in understanding life, is the manipulation of the mind in psychological ethics ands mental growth of the population from childhood, in making sure they know and understand what to aim for in life and about life in general, and not just what's important but "why" its important whether they take and use such advice materials and conditioning and use it or not. This conditioning in children is bombarded at them from every angle of life: Family / parenting / schools / religion / culture / traditions / International medias / socio-environments / politics / law / friends / work.
Home & family / parenting; The conditioning from childhood begins at home with the parents and parents can only condition their children to the knowledge and experience of their own life, and even do their best to step beyond that in teaching what they believe is right. The natural connection between any child and their parents can be very easily unnoticed but be very strong, and they will without qualification very easily believe without question anything taught to them by their parents regardless of any materials to contradict it. Making the teaching of such fundamental conditioning materials on understanding what to aim for in life important at such a young age. This conditioning of parenting is also taught indirectly, without any parent’s knowledge, by the child witnessing their parent’s views values, principles, endorsements, hate, prejudice and disgust on subjects, issues and ideals. For example; A Heterosexual child witnessing a parents view on Homosexuality will without question believe exactly same without understanding why or even having it directly taught to them on the levels of disgust the parent have on the subject.
Religion; Also starts at home through parenting, and religion carries with it the most violent and hateful teachings of such fundamental materials that involve the issue of Homosexuality. But one does not need to be religious as every value and aspects of religion are promoted and conditioned, whether a person is religious or not to understand it. The basis of religion regardless of God, Christ and belief is the foundation of all values, standards and principles on life and love on the moral dilemmas of life to know what to aim for in life personally specifically to do with them such as integrity & standards in monogamous relationships, love, marriage and lifelong commitment. As a person grows, this teaching that fades from the parents will more than likely be taken up in the person them self but will always keep the parents ideals on the subject. Religion is where most people receive their understanding of Homosexuality in line with religious doctrines as well as from the parents. This will also be the biggest confirmation by personal Heterosexual perception on the subject and they will not know anything different as there is nothing to contradict it. Since this belief is internationally promoted that way, international religious media conditioning controls & defines the entire international populations beliefs and makes their beliefs concrete, which in tern makes there mind permanently unchangeable regardless of 100% contrary proof.
Schools & education; Schools have changed a lot over the past twenty years, and new types of learning methods have developed, but schools still teach the same materials as before as well as the new, like Religious studies / cultural values / sex education / social studies / relationship studies and love & marriage. The teaching of principles and standards in what to aim for in every avenue of life is the main basis of schooling to condition responsibility and self-independents. Young Heterosexual children will also learn about things to avoid and persecute, either directly or indirectly from other children or teachers by witnessing other persons ideals on subjects like Homosexuality based on what they’ve been taught by other friends, parenting & religion, also with all forms of every level of international audio visual medias.
Media; The biggest form of global conditioning at the heart of Heterosexual society from childhood, is the only true form of international teaching tools, the populous mentally absorb willingly: entertainment;-
Films, Books, Magazines, Cinema, TV, Internet, News & Politics; Through all these media avenues, teaches exactly the same things as parenting, religion & schooling but on different levels, played perfectly through fact, fiction & fantasy and currant affairs. Things like legal standing, monogamy, love, sex, pornography, principles, standards, integrity, traditions, religious cultures, ideals, lifestyles, stereotypes, stigmas, domestic country problems, violence, prejudices, hate, discriminations, the moralities on doing the right thing, warnings, dangers, optional preferences on things to avoid, behaviours, being, having, doing, dismissing, disbelieving, acknowledging, ignoring, truth, looking, searching, denying, knowing, believing, deceit, lies and hypocrisy. Such as, only promoting the existence of certain minority’s by neutral parties without any genuine knowledge on the subject, confirming bias perceptions through stigmas of choice, lifestyles & stereotypes, which induces, indorses and enforces prejudice, tolerance and inequality. Heterosexuals from childhood, will be globally conditioned throughout their natural lives, aspiring to the way they live their lives according to all these core conditioning aspects of these international media teaching tools, by subconsciously identifying with these conditioned ideals in relation to their inherent natures, giving full psychological confirmation and conclusions on personal bias & prejudice assumptions.
So-called Friends; Another angle from which such conditioning manifest itself, is through friends and peer pressure at an unseen competitive level. Friends commonly compete, making a show of superiority on being the bigger man in comparison to others on issues in relation to finding the right woman in hope of a good long run in life and almost as much as finding the most visually attractive person for the here and now. This is mostly displayed by alpha males with a group of friends but either way the objective conditions standards and goals to aim for above others, in relation to themselves. These beneficial goals are also unknowingly and knowingly conditioned through friends on many other levels. But they also use curtain minority issues to condition the worst bias prospects to make someone less of a man to promote competitiveness of alpha male superiority. This superiority complex is not much of an issue in female groups of friends run by an alpha female, as they work on completely different levels.
Work; The conditioning by superiority Alpha male syndrome competitiveness brought on by testosterone, also exist in almost every workplace, where by some that are mainly male dominated but not just between men but women too. The basis of this superiority complex is about aspiring to be better than you are and seeing others around them boasting about all the best gains in life they’ve achieved- (whether its true or not) to belittle others in self gratification in hoping that they will see the superiority of difference in the achievement over others as a kind of role model of masculine normalcy. This is achieved through heterosexisms, discrimination and victimisation over others to create a fictitious prowess of male hierarchy. If one makes a visual achievement past the alpha male, the alpha male will do his best to belittle them to keep his superior position as role model but he will not fully consciously realise that he is actually doing it.
Social environments; Is the key place where society interacts with each other on every level, with a balance of medias that support all aspects of the here and now, and conditioning anything that can sell it to the alpha male’s national competitive status, with bars, clubs, late night licenses, Dominant Superiority complex on race & colour, and ambiguous cultural fashion-fad socio-exploitation, that induces fictional male hierarchy in society with such things like, sports, sports media, ethnic fad music and lifestyle. All with the underline fantasy premise of standards and principles in the hierarchy of male normalcy in obtaining the opposite sex for the superior man, and using anything regardless of what discriminating insults, to condition and promote the fantasy of hierarchy in what doesn’t cut the grade of masculine normalcy to reveal the lesser man, or what is not a man at all, in regards to difference in relation to physical, mentally, morally or natural inherent normalcy.
The fact that global Heterosexual sexploitation can not be left out, which is at such a degree it is equalising and almost over powering the global conditioning of marriage and lifelong commitment and is being conditioned now on equally as many levels, which is very likely overtaking everything that is conditioned for the long run in life, even on the young...
Marriage; The Global institution on completing the natural soul purpose in lifelong commitment if one takes such global conditioning of love and monogamy to heart. Many that don’t feel ready for such commitment, don’t ignore such conditioning, they simply deny it to themselves and even promote the prospect to others of their belief that such things to be pointless, or unnecessary, and call marriage just a piece of paper. As well as some, who are in a marriage that isn’t working, say the same. Global religion class’s marriage as the founding natural institution of Heterosexuality, and that nothing has morally or equal status.
All these conditioning grounds of global society combined are the biggest confirmation to a persons natural instinctive perception of purpose, which is magnified when a person does find a permanent partner. Which intern naturally and subconsciously without realising it, fulfils a natural purpose. Many people in the present will never understand why such conditioning is important to them, however much the reasons are pushed, even by parents or religion until most people either find that right person or become parents themselves.
Many people may dispute that last statement, but if it was wrong, what grounds of guidance would any person ever have to either understand how to keep a relationship, or marriage, or even teach their own children what is important in the long run when they have them themselves. And when they do have children, they will teach the same guidance, on all the same levels, and not just conditioning what is important, but why it is important, and conditioning them to reject and condemn anything alien that may contradict it in relation to the knowledge of the morality of the only nature they understand within themselves. The conditioning from childhood on Heterosexual Standards, principles and integrity in commitment, love, monogamy, relationships, and lifelong commitment, are conditioned globally on so many other levels, and this was just a hand full of bullet points.
But what if no such level of conditioning guidance whatsoever in Heterosexual society had ever existed, where would Heterosexual society be now?
(d) If no exposure too or this core conditioning guidance material ever existed.
The conditioning guidance of principles standards & integrity on monogamy and lifelong commitment, is bombarded at Heterosexual society from childhood, and from every angle and avenue to condition and enforce it without public choice or avenue to ignore it, whether any Heterosexual whatsoever takes, understands, ignores or utilises such conditioning guidance or not. But, if no such fundamental material or conditioning guidance on standards principles and integrity on love from (Family, parenting, religion, media, school, law etc.) of any avenue ever existed in history within Heterosexual society ever. It would be fact that Heterosexual society from childhood would have no choice but to solely figure out life as they go along, without any form of external moral basis conditioned to them to understand and place any personal gaol in life to aspire too to achieve in relation to their human inherent instincts. And would have no choice but to base any personal natural instincts on the nearest natural denominator within their own nature to understand that natural goal…
There is a big difference between inherent instinctive emotional and physical needs, and that nearest natural denominator would mostly be sexual. So, would it not be irrelevant for any Heterosexual to say, that if Homosexuals believe themselves to be equally and naturally to Heterosexuality, they should learn from seeing the conditioning guidance that Heterosexual society gives its own. Regardless of the exponential growth of international pornographic conditioning of sex, if not one image had ever been conditioned, guided, displayed, promoted, written about, sung about, taught about, lawfully & rightfully instated or laid down by religion or state government about a man and woman wanting to spend their lives together in love till the day they die, with a need and want for children based on that feeling to know how precious children really are, then Heterosexual society would feel confused to such a conceivable prospect for these fundamental conditioning tools to have never existed. Because such a prospect would be an alien concept to Heterosexuals, as it would be hard to identify the possible consequences of this guiding conditioning, if it never ever had been.
[An Alien concept is an original idea, position or prospect that never has been known, explained, shown, promoted, conditioned or demonstrated ever before].
Which makes one wonder where Heterosexual society would be if no such “core conditioning” guidance on society had ever existed, or was even conditioned the complete opposite to work against such naturally important instinctive goals. So would it not be irrelevant for any Heterosexual to say they can simply ignore such conditioning? Could one say is it not the fault of the individual if he or she doesn’t make the right choices in life?..
All these things are not just conditioned from childhood on the basis of what should be right, these are all elements that are conditioned through the power of suggestion in to the subconscious that one identifies with ones own specific nature, giving purpose to aspire to better oneself in achieving a natural goal.
So for every Heterosexual in every so-called civilised society without exemption is conditioned and guided by it from every conceivable angle to subconsciously identify with it to understand it in relation to their nature from childhood, whether the promotion of sex and pornography is equal or over balances this fundamental conditioning, and whether they take & utilise such conditioning guidance or not.
It is not only unavoidable without a choice or having to look for it,
It is Inevitable!…
But, in relation to a genuine inherent Homosexuality…
(e) Prospects neither side have contemplated
(Genuine Psychology research by B-F-P on the morality of Homosexuality with no added psycho-babble for easier reading;)
Not one piece of such fundamental core conditioning material guidance,
Exists!
“And never has"
Any core guiding materials should be as easily seen to all “without a choice” and conditioned to all throughout their entire natural lives without having to look for it, like with Heterosexual society. A Bisexual from young will understand that one inherent avenue of their nature is fully supported in every conceivable way within Heterosexual society and they can subconsciously extrapolate how to understand the other rejected avenue that is not supported in relation to it. But a Bisexual couldn’t possibly fathom the consequences on a persons life when their nature does not have that inherent avenue that is supported by Heterosexual society and only has the rejected nature from the largest individuals of society and receives the complete opposite of any form of supported conditioning. Government guided by religion and prejudice people in society have always stated; If Homosexuals believe they are equal to Heterosexuals then they should prove their civil liberties and live morally the same as Heterosexual society by utilitarianism.
Meaning of “Utilitarianism” [; 1, The doctrine that actions are right if they are useful or for the benefit of the majority by the greatest happiness of the greatest number, should be the guiding principles of conduct for all…]
Unfortunately in relation to genuine Homosexuality, there’s one major draw back and inevitable brick wall with that prospect that Heterosexuals state against the Homosexuals fight for rights. Because, not only does no core material conditioning guidance exist; Every genuine Homosexual from childhood and throughout their entire natural lives are without exemption subjected and conditioned by every prejudice aspect of Heterosexual society to only know and understand the projected prospect of the complete and total opposite, and not just for the hear and now, but for the long run, That anything Natural, Normal, Acceptable, Sociably inclusive, Legal, Lawful, Moral, Monogamous, permanent, Lifelong, Committed, Traditional, Cultural, Marital, Religious, Civil, Rightful, Human, Maternal, Procreative & Parental and Eternally Loving Or Equal, has not only absolutely nothing to do with them, it has no natural human level of equivalence to Heterosexuality for it to even be applicable to them. Making all these rejected fundamental important aspects by Heterosexual society to the instinctive needs of Homosexuals, to be an alien concept.
If it is a true inherent connection to the same sex, and they don’t have this necessary conditioning of fundamental guidance & support needs as the true inherent connection of sexuality would need from childhood, like Heterosexuality, what consequences would that have on an entire minority as it would mean "every" Homosexual worldwide without exemption, and why have so many Homosexuals bound themselves to such a sexual lifestyle?
"As well as only promote it".
(c)a, HOMOSEXUALITY; The Unknown Truth.
It is a fact that no such material exists; neither for Homosexuals in general or for parents to give the true guidance, teaching and support, in terms of principles and integrity in commitment, monogamy, permanent partnerships & love specifically on Homosexuality for their children if the child comes out to them as Gay. This is not a conditioning from childhood of sublime power of suggestion that a Homosexual would identify in one specific nature. Which means they would identify their nature more earlier than a Heterosexual would, because they are conditioned to understand it is wrong, and there will be nothing they can do about their nature to change it to what would be perceived as the only right.
Many believe Homosexuals should just learn from the confines of Heterosexual relationships and marriages, but, there is a broad moral difference between Heterosexual and Homosexual committed relationships. Because no matter how much the parents still love & support that child and that teach such guidance will not just depend on what a child should be guided to aim for personally in life. The main process of any form of guidance is so that child can understand the moral implications of "WHY" it is important, to learn the human morality of Homosexuality. Because the only Heterosexuals in lifelong committed relationships that could possibly understand this prospect are Heterosexuals biologically or by circumstance incapable of having children of their own. To believe adoption is the soul answer to the problem, is human arrogance, by people not realising that natural need. As many Heterosexuals as well Homosexuals have been found to personally believe and feel that adoption will not fill that mental gap. So to promote the morality of Homosexuality as being fully beneficial on the prospect of freely thinking adoption is the answer to all mentally beneficial needs would be the biggest mistake.
The only way to understand such a prospect is to understand sexuality as a whole, in terms of the natural soul purpose by an inherent connection. Most Homosexuals themselves are unaware of what exactly Homosexual morality is, and many that have, have found the biggest morality dilemma because of the "inherently born disposition to natural conception". And why so many are demanding adoption rights, and that is not even half the problem. Most Heterosexuals from childhood identify their inherent connection to the opposite sex with or without any sexual feelings or needs whatsoever, and if Homosexuality is inherent, logically it is the same for Homosexuals from childhood. But every Homosexual will be victimised through indirect and direct discrimination from the earliest of ages by the witnessing of family members or parents, friends, schools, media, society's disgust and hate of Homosexuality through either religion or good & bad media expression and exposure of Homosexuality of all kinds by stigmas. This is also added to by that child witnessing every form of prejudice & stigmatised media against Homosexuality, by his or her own eye’s.
Within State Education (Schools) a young Homosexual will witness homophobic hate and bullying of other children, or on themselves, whether the one doing the bullying is actually aware, he or she is actually bullying a Homosexual. Any Homosexual child witnessing this gives an automatic degradation of confidence on their nature and any feeling of a possible safe future, because of their nature they understand to be obviously different to the rest. Everyone inherently and permanently looks for what they need personally and are taught, guided and supported in every way to make the right choices in finding it and why. Homosexuals are the only global minority as a whole, in so-called civilised society's that have no such support, guidance or teaching on such things, neither by parents no matter how loving or by the state from childhood or at any age. Every Homosexual from childhood not only doesn't have those necessary things, but grows up being directly taught the complete opposite. That anything normal, natural, permanent, sociable, moral, monogamous, civil, acceptable, rightful & legal is permanently & unconditionally irrelevant to them, and can or will end up being subconsciously conditioned only understanding that prospect from their parents, religion, schools, friends, work, socio-environments and every national & international media type, even to the point that any future prospect of spending the rest of their lives with one person of the same sex and settling down marrying and having children would feel alien to them no matter how much they actually naturally feel they need & want that one person of the same sex. That may sound like a contradiction of perspective, but it actually isn't.
Every Homosexual from childhood that suffers this indirect and or direct victimisation, will unconsciously take it directly, and can or will end up believing it, as they will "know absolutely no different", however much they feel themselves to be naturally born that way, because not one piece of material exists to contradict it. Without any of these fundamental educational needs about life "specifically" to do with them, a young Homosexual because of this opposite conditioning from young, will without doubt makes that child feel that not only lifelong commitment to be alien to them it also mean marriage to equally as alien.
One “might” argue; is it not the fault of the individual if he or she does not make the right choices in life?…
But then, if that was right; If anyone from childhood and throughout their natural lives that has this complete opposite conditioning that should know what choices to make in life, why does society as a whole feel it is of absolute paramount of importance for such conditioning from childhood for Heterosexual children who actually do receive the correct conditioning guidance…
Maybe that’s because, if any young person, no matter who or what they are, that not only does not have any parenting teaching, guidance & support on what to aim for personally in life, and specifically to do with them and why, but then also receives the complete opposite with nothing to contradict it.
That person will have no choice, but to figure out the morality of their own life as they go along without external information material or moral support, and in doing so, looking for the nearest natural denominator to identify with to fill that mental gap which will mostly end up being sexual. The chances of "any" Homosexual receiving the correct guidance & support on love monogamy and commitment "specifically" to do with them from childhood at present or from the past, is about a much chance as winning the national lottery. There are no exceptions and that natural denominator will mostly end up being sexual. Also with this, that young Homosexual will unconsciously feel the natural need to be with others of his or her own sexuality and those others will be in exactly the same disposition.
One might still argue the fault of the person who makes bad choices in life. But any young Homosexual will look for guidance by identifying within others of the same sexuality and using them to find some understanding, but not realising those others will always be in the exactly the same situation without exemption. In doing so they will not realise, that they are subconsciously following the other by example, (What ever that example is) as they know absolutely no difference because nothing exist to contradict it. Throughout society as a whole there is no promoted distinctions of any form of Homosexual marriages, so young Homosexuals could have some form of personal goal to aspire too to achieve in any possible committed relationship. That added to the fact, that they will not know what to aim for personally in life on monogamy specifically to do with them in the first place to come psychologically close to any distinction on how to keep any integrity principles or standards in any Homosexual relationship or more importantly, why it is important. As there are no known promoted images or materials of moral ground rules on principles standards & integrity in Homosexual relationships, either by the state, religion, medias, family environments or within any of the LGBT community national media’s or social scene ground’s.
-[This unfortunate truth, is also contributed to by many Homosexuals that have received a much harder victimised childhood than others, and have lost out on any proper childhood mental growth on their inherent nature and have been exposed to more than just the opposite conditioning guidance. Leaving them emotionally inverted within themselves, and from childhood into maturity without being given any desperately needed avenue of acceptance from anyone. And once that avenue of acceptance whether their own social community or others in the same situation, could open that mental flood gate to that avenue of acceptance, making them extravert in need of attention and blindly accepting to that avenue. With that it could leave them more susceptible to growing up past maturity with a very arrogant, ignorant, childish, immature & cavalier attitude to life. Which can very easily and unknowingly condition them by many external influences from exposure to media or stigma driven feminine-fad-socio-environment conditions with no promote media images or materials to contradict it. Conditioning them from a mature mental stature, into pointless phases of arrogant and childish personality and character change's, against their originally grown personality traits. That can eventually becomes unchangeable from just a long lasting phase, of which that person would never realise the change or the permanent damage.
This is commonly known, which is about the easily conditioned nature of an emotionally inverted person with a personal need of acknowledgement attention and acceptance from certain people or environments they feel blindly and inherently attached too, and need acceptance on the subject matter that made them emotionally inverted, taking in what is done and seen to be correct in their eyes, to fit in with the rest, by a desperately grasped avenue to obtain it, and are only shown to know one way through those external media stigmas and feminine-fad-socio-environment influenced by the power of suggestion without ever having anything to contradict that powerful conditioning by suggestion or being shown anything different by their own.]-
Many Homosexuals do break away from self-victimisation and figure out their own moral standards, integrity and principles on relationships, commitment and love, and many do have long committed relationships of whom I take my hat off too.
But…
The largest majority of Homosexuals grow up in hope of being shown some direction, and do not see or receive any moral support and guidance through any materials or media types on any form principles or standards in understanding relationships & lifelong commitment, or standards and integrity in monogamy specifically to do with Homosexuality throughout any part of their lives, leaving them in a position where he or she "could" end up living an extremely sexual life and utilising it as a lifestyle and not an aspect of their nature. Anything lifelong & committed will feel alien to them however much they know what naturally feel they need it. This added to the fact that between Bisexuals and Homosexuals that don’t even know what exactly sexuality is in the first place, to explain it to themselves, let alone Heterosexual society hate and prejudices because of the mental barrier, making things even worse.
There are no exceptions...
That means every Homosexual, which includes the Homosexuals who run every venue and avenue of the social scene. Every Homosexual who runs and produces "every form and avenue of national gay media, gay press and social scene & lifestyle scene guides; every Homosexuals that work in the entertainment production industry from writers producers and directors. Every Homosexual, no matter of status or position; from the general public to personalities, MP's, celebrities, singers, actors, activists, rich or poor whether they've lived the social scene "or not". Because this opposite conditioning is at a never-ending constant battle through all forms of victimisation, indirect & direct discrimination and harassment from childhood in witnessing every form of disgust on Homosexuality, through family, religion, state, education, social society, promoted government law & issues, and every form of national stigma and stereotyped media (TV / Books / film / music / magazines etc, even through every gay media & political press and media produced by those who support them that believe its OK to choose to be that way.
For every Homosexual without exemption from childhood is conditioned by it,
It is not only unavoidable with nothing to contradict it.
It is inevitable!..
"THAT" is what the Sigma Project's and all the research institutions founding research "should" have been based on to find the core of the problem to why so many Homosexuals were catching HIV & Aids and why so exponentially over the past 30 years, but not one research institution, government or person ever has.
Because if Homosexuality is an inherent nature, meaning from birth,
Then any Homosexual "from, or at any age" that spends their life around an environment that exposes, influences, induces and endorses every form of such a sexual lifestyle of that nearest natural denominator they understand and every avenue to obtain it, and absolutely nothing to contradict it. That Homosexual no matter what age, will without a doubt be very susceptible to being directly and permanently "psychologically conditioned" to live it…
And they will end up knowing absolutely no different, because there is no promoted contradicting imagery or material to it, and will follow others by example whatever that example is without realising the others same disposition. Unfortunately making it a more powerful and perfectly grounded basis for conditioning sex addiction in a socio-sex-environment that the Sigma Project’s final research findings found. Homosexuals that are conditioned by this, will feel no obligation to force themselves to find anything better lifelong or committed, as any such thing would feel even more alien to them than it did before, and they will even promote their views in having no need for a lifelong commitment, however much they feel they still want love in that one person of the same sex…
Conclusion
The Sigma Project has proved (by its own unrealised research), that Homosexuality is most certainly not temporary experimentation of sexual behaviour based on arousal or lust through sexual oppression of Heterosexual men!
All it did prove on that subject, was a seriously conditioned minority to sex addiction by an environment, without any genuine narrowed down grounded cause to come to right conclusions on any projected growth of HIV & Aids within the LGBT community. Every Heterosexual knows the fact that Heterosexuality is not corruptible, because the inherent connection to only the opposite sex will always be there whether they experiment with the same sex or not. But they will also ignore the fact that Homosexual's have always said they are incapable of feeling anything for the opposite sex. Yet the researchers of the Sigma Project still dismissed Homosexuality as natural and classed it as men who have sex with men. Proving that the people who produced the Sigma Project, were not doing objective scientific research to find the facts & truth, based on objective and logical founding principles of science or the nature of Heterosexuality. But the perception of what they think it could, should, would or might be, in relation to what they believe they are capable of themselves within there own nature. Making the principles of their research to be completely unprofessional, unfounded and flawed by personal bias.
If part of the Sigma Project research was to find a socio moral basis of a minority on there being any permanent partnerships, why use people who are predominately sexually active? Plus were all the men they used really Homosexuals, even though these men calling themselves Homosexuals believe they were? The Sigma research stated many of these men calling themselves Homosexuals had relationships and sex with women and some only the year before and after they offered their services for the Sigma research.
The results of the biased written medical research of the Sigma Project only seemed to show Homosexuality as a deviant sex addiction within a corruptible Heterosexual nature caused by exposure to a socio-sex-environment, and never once bothered to see if the natural conditioning of guidance teaching & support in partnerships for conditioning within Heterosexuals were relevant to Homosexuals. Or even perceived a possibility that any guidance, teaching and support on the need of relationships and the importance of "why" from or at any age was relevant or even existed to even be relevant. This makes the Sigma Project to be completely and fundamentally flawed from a professional research point of view. Without exemption, the conditioning of the morality and standards and principles of your natural morality starts from childhood to truly understand it, without having to look for it. Any form of professional research must be done from every objective conceivable angles right through to find the core of the problem sustaining the issue to obtain the truth & facts. The sociology reports of the Sigma Project are available throughout the worldwide web and available to everyone including Governments, churches, schools, businesses and society in general. This leaves a very important question; do rights groups believe Homosexuality to be equal? If Homosexuality is a true sexuality, it is without doubt that Homosexual's from young must have the same guidance, support & teaching of monogamy, relationships, permanent partnerships, and like with Heterosexuality, the basis of what is equally as important, is "WHY" it is important, considering the natural choices Homosexuals don’t have because of a natural born disposition to natural conception and the only Heterosexuals that would truly understand that prospect would be Heterosexual couples who are biologically or by circumstance incapable of having children of their own. So why have no civil rights groups ever campaigned against the government for such unbelievably important materials, as this issue should be at the top level of every LGBT community civil rights agenda? Why has no such agenda of such "specifically" needed materials ever been conditioned by any civil rights group into the LGBT communities social grounds because grounds are the only place and time the LGBT community interact with each other and are seen together as a minority?..
The only thing on the subject they have fought for, is to abolish a law [Section 28] that forbids the teaching of genuine Homosexual relationships and classed them as pretend, but simultaneously with no important morally grounded reason why it should be abolished, apart from homophobic bullying, and that it is just a piece of written prejudice law. All rights groups and advisory groups use the findings of the Sigma Project to understand and promote the objectives of their agendas believing these research institutes know best, and unfortunately so does the government use the Sigma research when it come to writing legislation for law based on that minority…
(f) THE UNKNOWN IMPORTANCE
For Teaching Homosexuality & Bisexuality to Parents and In Schools To Children
All Homosexuals have had no true parenting on moral guidance of inherent dignity or state education or support, "specifically" for and on their nature, and equally why it is important so that they could find some form of guiding moral knowledge for young Homosexuals reaching sexual maturity and looking for natural needs, and know what to aim for personally in life for the long-run.
Is it not morally and fundamentally realistic to promote principles and standards of such things for the need and understanding of permanent relationships and commitment within ones own community grounds where young Homosexuals will socially interact with each other.
Promoting on those community public social grounds are not the responsibility of the governing state and that community have every legal standing, means and civil right to do so as a community of their own regardless that Section 28 only covered schools and local state authorities. Considering the non-existence of parenting and the "natural" choices every Homosexual does not have, and the realistic possibility the largest majority will end up looking for sex; it should have been the first thing the Homosexual communities civil rights lobby groups should have done. These necessary issues and needs, should be addressed at the top level of the people who support and work for that communities lawful, rightful and moral needs and interests, to work on prompting such unbelievably important principles & standards and in understanding why, through every avenue within those communities avenues regardless of age, because society as a whole, religion and the government will not and neither is it their responsibility. Since the social status and running of a community are its own responsibility, that community has no need of a government law to implement such a cultural necessity and a logical practicality, because it is that that also makes a people and a community of their own. Every kind of people, minority or community have a culture distinctive only to there own, which only they can create, and no other people have the power or need to change that, so that many Homosexuals world-wide can prove what the support is, on why they are demanding and campaigning for marriage & next of kin rights, adoption rights, and many other moral civil rights, laws and liberties. If they did, would it not prove that the LGBT community’s moral values are the same, if not that, it would prove to their own, that they have their own natural moral values to exploit. But such actions based on such values do not exist, so if they believe they are equal to Heterosexuals, by what is morally necessary, why do they not promote that throughout their own community social environments. Does the worldwide LGBT community as a people have such necessary ideals within their culture? Does the LGBT community actually have what could really be called a true culture? Does the LGBT community as a whole have any form of community council, in terms of an elected group of people who targets the moral needs within the LGBT community grounds? Has anyone within the community or working for its needs ever realised this or these implications before? The answer to all these questions is: No…
If they believe themselves to be equal to Heterosexuals, should LGBT community not treat themselves as such, if not for the present adult generations, then for their sake of the next younger generations, and more importantly, if the LGBT community don’t in the present or future… Why?
Every Homosexual child at present is still in the position of no true parenting or guidance on their own morality. The LGBT community as a whole, within the way it shows and promotes itself in every way, is far from becoming an image of a true culture, or a people that holds any natural moral principles of who they really are to themselves, or the faces of the people that refuse them their lawful moral civil rights. A parent who has or suspects their child is a Homosexual, and if knowledgeable on such necessary guidance on commitment, could try and teach their child about a genuine Homosexual relationship. But religion, government, law, society and media will teach and condition that parent to believe the complete opposite. No material or media guidance exists to teach parents about the implications of the morality of Homosexuality, in terms of an entire worldwide minority of people with a naturally born disposition to natural conception, that will be incapable of having children of their own or feeling for the opposite sex. The only Heterosexuals that truly understand the misfortunate disposition to conception are Heterosexual individuals or couples that biologically or by circumstance equally incapable of such natural conception.
For many, adoption works perfectly, and many go for surrogacy over adoption because they believe adoption will never fill that mental gap. But for many, neither is an option or any form of moral answer.
Rights groups can only do what they can however much their own community & state government works against them. Without the correct education in schools, young Homosexuals will never learn any possibilities on what to aim for personally in life. Without the necessary educational needs the LGBT community as a whole will never evolve to better themselves, or move forward.
If the most likely logical conclusion to be fact; is that Homosexuality is inherently natural and equal to Heterosexuality, then it is absolutely imperative that educational curriculum materials on the truth of Homosexuality is placed in schools, and the reasons for doing so, should be put to the government.
No one in government appears to have asked the simplest of logical questions on Homosexuality over the last 40 years to realise any education on Homosexuality might actually be irrelevant to sex education and might actually mean the teaching of; Inherent Dignity, Love, The confines of Human Sexuality, Distinctions of Sexuality, Monogamy, Permanent Partnerships & Commitment, Relationship Studies, Fundamental Differences, Natural & Biological Dispositions Of Conception, Adoption and Implications Of Adoption, Other “Genuine” Family Relationships & Environments, Culture, Universal Diversity & Social Inclusion, History of Social & Cultural Activism, Judgement & Perception, Human Morality, Fundamental Truths, And then, sex education equal to Heterosexual sex education, which could help teach children to educate their parents with their schoolwork.
Currently, sex education is about the human body, contraception and understanding the practicality of pregnancy, which is always implemented into science classes. The Morality of human nature is not a science lesson, and no morality issues of inherent dignity were placed in science lessons in the 1980’s & 1990’s. So why was Section 28 classing pretend family relationships. This teaching is absolutely fundamental to young Homosexuals for life, just as the morality of loving relationships is to Heterosexual children, and in doing so, informing young Heterosexual children of the absolute truth, to make them understand the natural disposition and opposite “nature”, which will eventually reverse the conditioned prejudice & hate by perception in children against Homosexuality.
And by removing the conditioned prejudice in Heterosexual children that would normally identify it as an alien life choice, it would eradicate the hateful bullying!
And intern, stop the mental degradation of Homosexual children.
No LGBT rights groups in the entire fight for equality has even come close to these conclusions, and all these things are imperative to what every young Homosexual needs to have, for gaining both a better future and life, which is what every Homosexual in past history and at present, should have had. But were they ever given any moral chance? If the government thought Homosexuality was inherent, would they not have brought up the issue of needing the teaching of it to Homosexual children in relation to the same things taught to Heterosexual children, for the sake of young Homosexual’s mental stability. And made every attempt to stamp out homophobic bullying.
What was the “founding principle” to do the complete opposite with Section 28???? Were the government operating on the prospect, that if Homosexuality is acquired, Homosexuals would have to be something else first…. Did that mean they think such teaching of Homosexual relationships in schools to children might turn Heterosexual children into Homosexuals…
Every church, “Government”, Society, Bias Heterosexual and media worldwide have always made the issue over the protection of legal discrimination because they think it is a choice of sexual practice. Have Heterosexuals ever put any thought into what real unbelievable & fatal consequences that Homosexuals have endured through history and are still enduring? Have they ever contemplated the truly unbelievable “Epic scale of human injustice” worse than world-war II’s Hitler, which would makes Hitler look like a common separatist, with consequences the average parent could never possibly fathom…If they are wrong!..
Chapter 7,
The Final Conclusion
SOCIAL CONDITIONING.
The LGBT community civil rights lobby groups and advisory groups endlessly promote and push through media the separatist stigma of “Coming-Out” to their own through every avenue without realising damage they cause to many genuine Homosexuals, and promoting it by all LGBT media’s that every Homosexual should “come-out” of the closet. The majority of Genuine Homosexuals that are actually happy in their lives, treat themselves equally the same as Heterosexuals, but are being stigmatised through LGBT community separatism by their own minority to expose themselves as the fantasy stigma to come-out and segregate themselves as irrevocably different & irrelevant to the naturally accepted general norms of the larger majority. This makes genuine Homosexuals feel more cornered by this stigmatisation from their own minority and community putting this victimisation on their shoulders, than any oppression, victimisation or prejudice a bias Heterosexual could ever achieve on a Homosexual. Activists and rights groups that push this stigma work on a view that coming-out is allowing them to feel free to express their Homosexual side. But to Heterosexuals and genuine Homosexuals, there is no expression of a particular prospective side to their nature, because you either are a Heterosexual or Homosexual, or your not. Are the ones pushing this agenda, Bisexuals that believe they chose to be Homosexuals because they’re predominantly connected to the same sex? The largest majority of Genuine Homosexuals feel no need to come-out, but when these genuine Homosexuals express their views politically to their own that they don’t believe they need to come-out to anyone, their voices are silenced and over powered by their own community media and rights groups. So just who is doing persecuting?
How easy is it to be conditioned?
Direct Conditioning by Global misperception and bad judgement
The religious and anti-gay hate channelled through governments is worldwide, and 70 to 85% of the world’s population is guided by one religion or another that believes in a God that created a totally Heterosexual human race. All of that bias and prejudice of opinion by assumption through perception has no logical moral standing against Homosexuals. The last time anyone in Britain technically had any true legal grounds to oppose Homosexuals on the reason religion discriminates, was 37 years ago when the act of sex between men was illegal, and that was the day when any opposing state agenda should of ended. Because of the belief of choice, that legality was classed as Homosexuality, when in fact all that was technically legalised was a small aspect of what Homosexuality actually is. Since that legal standing was made, the government guided by religion refused to endorse anything to Homosexuals whatever they campaigned and demonstrated for. The LGBT community’s civil rights groups are the only good thing that has risen from the oppression, even though all they have gained is two laws (one in 1967 and the equal age of consent) and recognition that a minority exist but the question should be asked; recognition as what?
If the theory of Homosexuality being a life choice of sexual behaviour to be that way "did not exist", would the religious political and societies debate of prejudice on Homosexuality not ended 37 years ago?
Direct conditioning by indirect victimisation.
Every Homosexual in every country, has and still is loosing out on any form of childhood mental growth on moral guidance, because of the indirect discrimination, forcing them to victimise themselves by there own families, friends, schooling, government, religion and media. And in doing so, loosing out on the fundamental parenting & education they should have had. Every Homosexual has lost out on true parenting and education specifically on them, and that victimisation has caused the largest percent of Homosexuals subconsciously restricting themselves by self-victimisation to the social stigma that anything normal, natural, moral, acceptable, permanent, monogamous, rightful & legal is irrelevant to them, no matter how much they believe they're born that way or how much civil rights fight for rights. It leaves many of them desperately and subconsciously looking for the nearest natural denominator to understand that mental gap. In doing so, identifying by following their own by example, which are also in the same disposition. This includes every country regardless of how many races wish to disbelieve Homosexuality stems within their race. This is the reality of every Homosexual, to figure out life as they go along without exemption. This includes every Activist, Anarchist and all the ones who own every venue and avenue of the gay social scene, the ones who run and support civil rights groups, all LGBT media groups, politicians, personalities, Singers, Actors, rich or poor, every Homosexual, regardless that they push themselves away from this victimisation in future life, when from young, it should never have been.
Direct conditioning by an untamed social structure.
Because every Homosexual is in the same situation, that includes every Homosexual who runs, promotes, endorses, every venue and establishment on the LGBT community's social scene and its promotional structure of magazines & entertainment medias of all kinds. And the LGBT community's social scene is based on what sells the most; Sex. It gives every single avenue to obtain it and it offers nothing else. Which unknowingly but directly conditioning its own community to take it, as the largest percent of Homosexuals from young will know no different, however much they personally believe and know there is more to their lives and nature than sex.
Direct conditioning to collect social stigmas & labels by civil rights in the eyes of bigots.
For decades since the 60's, Homosexuals have been reclaiming labels with no meanings or distinction, created by Heterosexual bigotry. For example, "Gay" coined in the 30's as a more humorous term for Homosexual men, who were flamboyant, extravert & feminine, as the real term for Gay meant; full of joy, to be happy. "Queen", coined in the late 50's for Homosexual men that were overly feminine and camp almost like a woman with the same attitudes. "Poof & Queer" & "faggot" coined also in the 30's - 40's starting in America pre world-war, Poof has no meaning and was given to show verbal hate and disgust of a Homosexual. "Queer" was and still is, a term for strange or weird, and used to victimise Homosexuals even though Homosexuals use this term endlessly in their advertising, and even civil right campaigns.
“Faggot or Fag”, has no meaning in relation to human being that is different and was created in America as a direct label to verbally give disgust and hate and abuse, the only other meaning for faggot, is a minced beef & onion dumpling with gravy. "Closeted", is a bigoted term, for hiding an aspect of different self-convictions, and a conviction means "a self admittance of good or bad choices” and or opinions or beliefs. This was coined for Homosexuals who victimise themselves in hiding what they are to themselves as well as the others. Between the 60's - present day the terms Coming-Out, Openly Gay, Outted and Sexual Preference, are the worst of them all.
"Coming-out" was coined by prejudice Heterosexuals and media in promoting the issue of a Homosexual owning up to their convictions of the choice to a different sexual conduct, which has now been reclaimed by the so-called gay medias and rights groups. The fact is, that any Homosexual that admits his sexuality, is either answering the inevitable question or voluntarily offering information, thinking the other person just knows a little more about them, like their favourite colour. But Heterosexuals do not see it that way, because Heterosexuals feel no need to come out and because of their humanism perception on the issue, if they are unaware what Homosexuality is. All they see is a person owning up to ones own self-conviction of choice. The LGBT community have now reclaimed this separatist term, and use it on their own to do exactly the same bigoted separatist objective, but hoping it would bring more Homosexuals out of their self-victimisation, without realising the damage it causes. Even activists, anarchists & civil rights promote this issue on young Homosexuals. When the largest percent of Heterosexuals believe it is a choice, and when a Homosexual comes out they only see it as owning up to the perceived convictions confirming the bigoted and prejudice beliefs to act against them.
There are thousands of Homosexual children stuck within an endless plethora of cultures and religions that not only hate Homosexuals, but kill them more than willingly. Between Jamaica, Nigeria, St Lucia, and other black races and cultures, hundreds of young black men immigrate to Britain yearly to escape their own death from their own parents, families and countries. In many of these countries the state police have been well known to help the public hunt down and kill Homosexuals like fox hunting. Many that have come to Britain especially from Jamaica, have admitted to witnessing their own fathers murdering their own children because they were found with another man and have had them tracked down by the police, so the family could kill them. Many children and young men in such Black minority families within Great Britain are equally scared of any physical and possible fatal outcome from their own families because of the witnessing of such total hate, loathing and disgust on the subject. Many Black cultures believe they are void of Homosexuality because of a superiority complex on the subject in relation to skin colour and many say it is a white mans disease, and kill any possible Homosexuals to keep the bigoted stigma to further condition the continuance of the fantasy superiority of a culture for hate. In Great Britain and many other countries segregated Muslim sects believe in honour killings and torture if a member of the family or even a stranger or foreigner is a Homosexual.
The LGBT community anarchists endanger the independence of some people that might actually be part of their own community. As some so-called gay-rights groups promote the term, and deliberately go out of their way to expose personalities like politicians or actors and singers so they can make victory points on exposing the statistics of the out majority of known personalities, and then make arrogant statements to those people for not owning up to it. Coming-out carries obvious underline premise of owning up to their convictions, and convictions are good or bad choices. If civil rights groups truly believe Homosexuals are equal Heterosexuals, the factual issue that should be demonstrated, pushed, advertised & promoted and campaigned for, was the fact that young Heterosexuals don't come out and feel no need too, because knowing your nature without having to advertise the fact is natural, so why should Homosexuals? Yes it is hard for a person to admit to others they are Homosexual because of inevitable persecution, and the very issue of people getting away from victimising themselves is very seriously complicated. It is well known a large majority of young Homosexuals are in potentially dangerous and to some fatal environments, families, workplaces, schools, ethnic communities, cultures and specifically foreign religions.
The real issue should be for Heterosexuals to understand the subject, that young Homosexuals should understand their nature as normal & natural and to be proud of it giving no need to advertise it. Whether your proud of your nature or not, is it not persecution in itself for a community who believe they are equal to larger majority and fight for rights based on that belief, but then push their own prospective minority members into a blinding need to expose themselves as irrevocably different and irrelevant to the general naturally accepted norms of the larger majority who feel no need to announce they’re Heterosexuality. Because when these labels, terms and classifications are promoted, they are promoted to all and to all those who will judge by personal perception the ones who use them to expose there own. Which just confirms the worst bias perceptions of the individual prejudice parents and members of society to continually act against them. Especially when a major majority of Homosexuals actually feel no need to come-out, but are perceived, labelled, classified and stigmatised as coming-out by their own and the rest of society as owning up to their convictions of good or bad choices simply because they inadvertently offered some information or answered the inevitable question.
The term "Openly Gay" works on exactly the same separatist principles, because what exactly is an openly straight Heterosexual? "Outted" is just as destructive and lobby groups have reclaimed this term and use on their own, especially activists or anarchists that go out of their way to colloquially out politicians, actors and personality's, and many of these have nothing to with the self-victimising Homosexuals or Bisexuals pretending to be Heterosexuals and speaking against the LGBT community to protect personal image, which makes one wonder, just who is doing the persecuting.
Yet activists, anarchists, rights groups, media, government and the LGBT community media’s all use this term, and promote it endlessly without qualification or justification which is what this prejudice classification was designed for by bias single-minded politicians to bring up the issue of the LGBT community in legal writing without being specific. What is the need to collect these separatist labels, terms, and political classifications, and to what purpose do activists believe it serves and achieves, and what does the LGBT community believe they gain by them? In the eye's of the people, that perceive the life choice theory, and when they see these labels being collected and demonstrated and used by the LGBT community, it is only enforces, induces, promotes and endorses an admittance on a statement of self conviction in their eyes, which in doing so, confirming societies worst perceptions of the LGBT community to act against them socially and politically. So just where is the justification of the label term uses by the LGBT community groups and medias, regardless of bigots if they cannot figure out the whole reason why they are persecuted in the first place. With these confirmed prejudice perceptions of these stigma labels, do civil rights groups, activists and anarchists only fight for equality over all the treatments of difference based on the prejudice and hate done directly against them. Or have they ever fought over the issue of "WHY" this prejudice and hate exists…
Direct International media conditioning on society by confirmation of perception by promoting endless common stigmas in all stereotypes of Homosexuality rarely ever change within the international media's of the entertainment industry and press industry; in doing so, they confirm the stigma misconceptions.
In 2003, on the big issue of bishop Geoffrey John having to step down, all TV reports given on the BBC national 6, 9 and 10 o'clock news made a big issue and stated the terms; "men of Homosexual sexual conduct & practices within the church, should we allow them" even though a bishop that supported Geoffrey John, stated; Geoffrey John has been a celibate non-practising Homosexual for 12 years. Why have rights groups not campaigned against the use of religious theory within political correctness of national television on the life choice stigma. Anyone no matter who or what they are that promotes the life choice theory on national television will only give a confirmation on prejudice perceptions to the British national public.
If it is ok for national television to broadcast the life choice stigma to a national audience of millions, no matter who is behind it, it will only promote and justify the bigoted Heterosexual notions, perceptions and actions that Homosexuality is an act, a practice, a life choice "vice" of sex to be that way. Which leaves an interesting question; If Homosexuality is just a Heterosexuals choice of a sexual vice based only on arousal; meaning they would still "only" naturally feel for the opposite sex; Why does Bishop Geoffrey John after being celibate for 12 years "only" class himself as a Homosexual, and disregards and disbelieves he is Heterosexual? It is a fact that any person will do what is easiest by the nearest denominator to obtain and achieve an objective, and since LGBT community feel safer being tolerated, than they are being directly victimised, they have slackened in their fight for what’s right. But not realising they are now, more than ever, victimising themselves in a way that they couldn't possibly fathom the consequences. Everything they are doing is just confirming the perceptions of the bigoted, creating an endless viscous circle of mutually dependent conditions that creating a catalyst of endlessly looping dilemmas of circumstances of which there is no escape, or simply a catch 22 and 360% fight against oppression, and they don’t realise they're doing it or causing it. And defeating the purpose of fighting for civil rights and the only way to truly understand this is to truly understand the real meaning of the equality they fight for.
How can you stop the LGBT community from tolerating the tolerance and promote the truth, when they feel it's easier and safer for them to live that way?
If the LGBT allow any form of the void life choice theory to be openly promoted and justified to the nation by any form of national media, even if it is by their own, they might as well give up the fight. It is that void theory that is the "main influence" to the core of the problem, making it the number one issue of the entire worldwide debate in fighting for equal civil rights & laws that needs to addressed. It is that void theory that is refusing the LGBT community those civil rights & laws. So why are they allowing this void theory to be promoted, even by their own? If the government knew Homosexuality & Bisexuality was an inherent dignity and about eternal love for the same sex, why do they refuse marriage laws? If Homosexuals or Bisexuals were a minority of confused Heterosexuals with only an inherent connection to the opposite sex, that choose to try and ignore and push themselves away from that natural need of the opposite sex for the rest of their lives all for the sake of a confused vice of sexual gratification with other Heterosexuals of the same sex through experimentation with persons they are not even sexually attracted based on arousal if and when it manifests itself, which by nature would inevitably fail. Who also force themselves to live a whole life of direct and self victimisation & discrimination through dehumanisation from prejudice society that places themselves in many situations of direct confrontation and all kinds of abuse for the sake of this sexually aroused vice with the same sex.
Who also as a worldwide minority indirectly connected to each other, put all physical effort & financial resources into civil rights to fight for laws like marriage rights to spend the rest of their lives with a person they are neither sexually attracted or emotionally connected to, making no real reason to even contemplate the need to even think about marriage, but do it anyway with every effort to gain it. (E.g. A Heterosexual male fighting for the right to marry a woman who is not his personal preference of female and is neither sexually attracted or emotionally connected too, in anyway whatsoever, and for nothing less and nothing more than just for the sake of a sexual gratification based on arousal if and when it manifest itself, with her equal reciprocation towards him, for the rest of his and her life). Who also as a minority, fight for adoption rights for these couples who have absolutely no feeling towards each other to have and bring up children with each other for the rest of their lives. Who also fight for the right to have this emotionless need for sexual gratification based on arousal to be taught in schools to no practical gain for that global minority, in anyway whatsoever to even contemplate the need for its teaching in the first place, but do it anyway.
Since bias & prejudice Heterosexuals believes the world population is a Heterosexual race and any other sexuality is a choice, does any of this make any real sense to reality? Ministries have always taught that Homosexuality is a choice, when the Bible gives nothing in any way whatsoever on any lifelong committed choice. To believe there is no moral equivalence between Homosexuality and Heterosexuality is to believe Homosexuals are incapable of true love for each other as partners. And to believe they want to be permanently incapable of true love is to say they are in human. To believe this, is to believe true love is only bound as a Heterosexual trait. To believe Homosexuality has nothing to do with the needs of love is to believe there is No Moral Equivalence, regardless of sexual practise.
It has never been recorded that any Heterosexual has made the conscious choice to be a Heterosexual to give them any natural superiority. The church refuses to endorse marriage for Homosexuals because they believe it would devalue all the natural values of marriage and family, and they state the purpose of marriage and family environment is for the soul purpose of procreation and any same sex marriage is pretend family relationship & environment. This makes no sense, as Heterosexual marriage is not for the soul purpose of procreation as procreation is what comes from the founding principle of what marriage is based on; Love, but if the church believes marriage is based solely on procreation to justify an argument to rebuke same sex marriage, then this leaves questions to their belief on eternal love for the opposite sex.
For example: 1) If marriage is solely founded on the procreation of children, Why is divorce legal? Unless the children have perished or moved on.
2) Why is it legal for Heterosexual couples biologically or by circumstance incapable of having children of their own allowed, or even couples "unwilling" to have children.
3) If it is solely for the procreation of children, why is that prospect not written into any contract or ceremony of holy matrimony, of any kind.
4) Isn’t marriage based on a more logical deep-seated purpose, like LOVE.
5) Does not the maternal need for procreation in all men or women not come from the founding principle feeling of wanting to marry the other person in the first place.
6) If the main soul purpose of marriage is for the purpose of procreation not love, why find Love or be monogamous with anyone, or even feel the need to get married.
7) If it is only about procreation, why not just find someone or anyone no matter who, and just procreate.
But then again, would that not eradicate and devalue the moral basis for Heterosexual marriage, or any marriage….
To discriminate against Homosexuals on the prospect of marriage by the "state", religion & "Government", for the reasons and political language they state, is to believe & say the reasons Homosexuals want marriage laws has absolutely nothing to do with "love" or a committed lifelong need to be together…
If the state government restricting this naturally needed right & Law, then they logically believe exactly "same" whether these Politicians are religious or not, and explains once again why prejudice Heterosexuals state there is no moral equivalence. Have rights groups not pushed that argument of this value, and if not "why". These correct paramount issues of fact between Heterosexuals, Bisexuals and Homosexuals have never been noted, stated, demonstrated announced, advertised, pushed, implied, applied, campaigned over and fought over by anyone from either side of the debate.
For decades, Activists have been campaigning against the government for human rights, because Homosexuals are being treated worse that 3rd class citizen’s, and also state that; Heterosexual society ideals are based on colonialism. How far does the hypocrisy and fascism go. Could this have been something new that civil rights are doing, or has civil rights always been doing a 360 degree fight against oppression? Civil rights lobby groups are the only groups that have the position & standing to push social scene venues into promoting the right images and it should be them that should be pushing the social scene into social reform. If the government will not allow teaching of Homosexuality in schools and parents have no idea what to teach to their children, because they don’t know what it is exactly. Why has the LGBT community’s civil rights lobby groups never promoted or condition such fundamental guidance to their own after schooling age through their own “community grounds” of any form of core conditioning materials on principles, standards, integrity on monogamy, lifelong commitment and love in Homosexual relationships, or even just images of that prospect? Because they’ve never needed any form of law, right or permission from government, religion or the rest of society to do that, and they’ve had nearly 40 years to do it… So where is it???
Where’s the boasting of civil right’s victory points and diversity champion activist on that ground? Does the LGBT community’s civil rights lobby groups and civil rights activists think that government, religion and the rest of society do not see these obvious facts? Civil rights have achieved a great deal in promoting the recognition of Homosexuality in society, but perhaps civil rights should stop to think for five minutes, and ponder the question; why in nearly 40 years, have they achieved only 2 laws; legalisation amendment of that act of sex in 1967, and the equalisation of the age of consent. Why are civil rights groups never realising or promoting what is important to the LGBT community, as they are the only ones who can, and have the position to do so? Why are civil rights lobby groups only fighting for legal reform and not social reform? And why is it, when civil rights fight for legal reform, they always screw it up 80% of the time, without fail? Why does not one piece of such conditioning guidance exist? Legal reform will not solve the issue, neither will the recognition and acceptance of Homosexuality, because the question needs to be asked: Recognised and accepted as what?
Campaign group leaders have argued against B-F-P on pushing an agenda against Bisexuals who believe they are Homosexuals as discriminatory to their personal believed ideals to accept themselves as Bisexuals and not Homosexuals and that the oppression is not a sexual apartheid. But this belief ideals are equally as bias, prejudice and destructive to Homosexuals, as the Heterosexual prejudice over Homosexuality as a life choice of sex with nothing to do with characteristics of inherent dignity. Which LGBT civil rights groups feel justified in fighting against this bias Heterosexual belief system of ideals, even though this fight for equality is equally as discriminatory against Heterosexuals personal ideals over others in believing it is a choice. So to argue that its OK for one to fight to change the Heterosexual belief system, but wrong to fight against Bisexuals who believe they’re Homosexuals who create equally as much damage, would be unjustified colonial hypocrisy and fascism. The freedom of the natural life of a human minority from physical and mental degradation through destructive dehumanisation, is fundamentally more important than any majority’s idealism’s, which one assumes the LGBT community have been fighting for rights based on that premise. The B-F-P agenda on Bisexuality, is the opposite of dehumanisation as B-F-P is promoting that Bisexuality “is” an inherent dignity, contrary to popular Bisexual & Heterosexual belief.
But both sides of the entire debate believe their debate on the issue is an irrefutable one-way argument, and in doing so they have both set themselves up in the biggest discrimination game of the new millennium, without realising the facts of reality; that neither side of ‘any debate’ is infallible. As both opposing sides of the debate are endlessly and blindly smashing their heads up against the most unbelievable invisible brick wall known to historical debating, with a metaphoric game of tennis in trying to destroy the opponent with an unproven belief through a verbalised prêt election of irrelevancy demonstrating an unforeseen own goal. Without making any attempt whatsoever to understand the opponent or contemplating other possibilities, or the fact that you cannot fight fire with fire; you must understand what ignited it in the first place.
These 2000 year old globally bias and prejudice social, legal and religious constructs of conditioning solely based on natural single-minded mental barriers confirming personal perceptions, have institutionalises unchangeable belief systems into both sides of the entire debate. Which constitutionalises a multitude of complex archaic paradox’s of unfathomable hostile effects through mutually conflicting dependant conditions, creating a catalyst of endlessly looping dilemmas and circumstances of which there is no escape. Or to be precise; the biggest catch 22 and a 360 degree fight against oppression of which neither side of the entire controversial debate know the cause or the core of the problem that created it, the situation sustaining it, or understand any genuine reality of truth to workout any form of constructive conclusion to resolve it; regardless that this is the only debate on the entire planet that has no neutral party to delegate any winning rights on any possible resolve.
All these things are not confined to the UK; this problem is worldwide in every major so-called civilised country and city that indorses social inclusion with an LGBT community fighting for civil rights & laws that are desperately needed. It is more than likely that LGBT don’t even realise that the rest of society can see these obvious social constructs confirming prejudice perception to continually act against them.
Regardless that Section 28 has been abolished, that does not mean in anyway that the government is now going to allow the teaching genuine Homosexual relationships in schools, as no state law has been written yet, to “allow” that subject to be taught in schools because between several Sections 404, 405, 406, 408 of the Learning and skills Act 2000, and the new Clause 5 & 8 of GTC Teachers Code Of Conduct, and amendments to Education Act 1996, have created a statutory legal mechanism equal to a new Section 28 without being direct, which states any form of family relationship, environment or marriage is to be in relation to cultural religious values only. No such law is written that can contradict human rights laws on religious freedom and expression, which human rights laws hold religion as a higher priority than any minority that is not recognised as an inherent dignity.
If the LGBT community do not understand what exactly sexuality is, to know what curriculum materials are needed to be taught in schools to children, how do they ever expect Heterosexual society to understand what it is to gain any laws or civil rights they fight for to the fullest extent?
If Heterosexual society are not teaching any curriculum materials because have no idea what Homosexuality or Bisexuality is to teach it, or even laws to enforce that teaching, let alone the LGBT community groups who do not know what genuine sexuality actually is in the first place, to know what curriculum materials should be promoted in schools,
Then Just Who Will?..
|
