|
The Name Change Brief "Summary"
© Copyright 2005 B-F-P All rights reserved
Click Here to download a presentable pdf format of this document for printing or for saving
By Jonathan J Joslin
Summery to this investigation.
Within the past two and a half years, something very strange has been happening across the globe, nearly every government of every so-called civilised country that indorses social-inclusion, have pushed for the national banning of Homosexual marriages from all of theses countries, except Britain. Australia has achieved this national banning and now America will achieve it now George Bush is back for another four years. Britain is not pushing for a national banning of Homosexual marriage, it is just refraining from instating it, well, as it would seem, until now.
B-F-P a developing social reform project that has been in development over the past two years since the middle of 2002, and will be in development for the next nine months. The reason for this brief was an extended research offspring off the B-F-P main sociology research project conducted between 1999-2004 which was accomplished to make sure that the B-F-P social reform project was based on genuine research and facts so to protect the projects exploitation interests.
Unfortunately, during this extensive research process and material gathering in June 2002, B-F-P came across a ministry dossier that was written and published in May 2002, by a top Californian lawyer and religious minister Scott D Lively, of a religious pro-family alliance group called the Abiding Truth Ministries, who wrote an analytical dossier of which was posted to almost every Christian Fundamentalist group in America, and then passed onto every religious ministry website regardless of religious denomination based on the Bible; Anglican / Christian / Baptist / Catholic etc. These segregated denominations would normally have nothing to do with one another, but they all jointly published this same ministry dossier on their websites. By the end of May 2002, this dossier had reached nearly every religious denomination in the UK of which this dossier was published on their websites, including The Christian Institute site (under press releases) and the Church Of England’s House of Bishops website (under papers).
This dossier was analytical and political strategy plan on implementing terms and classifications into anti-discrimination laws on defining what the LGBT community should be redefined as through law, in an attempt to put the legal reform battle of civil rights fight for equality back decades without anyone realising it, by changing the entire basis of legally construed definition of the Homosexual community, without allowing the social construct subject matter of legal rights debate to be changed.
In doing so, legally classifying the Homosexual community through law as a conditioned or conscious choice of sexual behaviour to eradicate any possibility of legally construed natural immutable characteristics of sexuality and inherent dignity, and banned the only usable supporting legal statutory name that actually did. The ministry dossier principles behind this was stop any form Homosexual marriage laws being legally construed as equal to Heterosexual marriage, and to create legal mechanism of law to make sure no form of educational curriculum materials in schools could every be legitimised to children on the subject of Homosexuality.
During June and July 2002 on the creation of the Equality Bill [HL] and the separate Sexual Orientation Regulations, an extreme change was made to the draft legislation in the interpretations, on fully defining the meaning of what the LGBT community and “religion or belief”, when legally construed in written law before its first reading in the commons. At the beginning of 2003, the DTI and the House of Lords accepted and implemented into the legislation further new clauses and subsections into the Genuine Occupation Requirements (G.O.R) in relation to the defined interpretations.
The G.O.R amendments written word for word and added by the Church of England fully defining the LGBT community and religious beliefs through law, have made the Equality Bill and the Sexual Orientation Regulations2003 an illegal fraud, which no one has realised the full implications, even though civil rights groups and trade union groups have fought against the Equality Bill on these grounds without knowing the full implications.
The Church of England committed an act of heresy over orthodox doctrine in contradicting the founding principle of every religion based on the Bible, by redefining in law what a religious belief is, with terms of political belief systems that had nothing to do with religion like Agnosticism & Atheism and Humanism, and legally defined them as genuine religious beliefs. Civil rights lobby groups have been confused as to why the government have implemented new provisions into the Civil Partnership Bill for Heterosexual couples that not based on eternal marital love, and Trade union groups are trying to figure out how the Church got away with legally defining religious belief in the Equality Bill and Sexual Orientation Regulations with terms that have nothing to with religion, but are unaware of other illegal implications that contradict its legal purpose. And civil rights groups have been confused as to why there appears to be ghost left behind, after the death of Section 28.
The strategic soul purpose of the ministry dossier was get government to legally define the LGBT community within law as an act of sex and eradicate any legal definitions of legally justifiable sexuality in word of written law to stop any chance of human rights laws protecting them fully.
Everything that was in the ministry dossier was implemented into the Equality Bill and the Sexual Orientation Regulations 2003. Which created a point of origin in relation to two past education laws that have initiated “a very complex and brand new Section 28”, through the GTC Teachers Code of Conduct, The Learning and Skills Act 2000 and the Equality Bill and Sexual Orientation Regulations 2003, without having to be directly discriminating by using the name Homosexual.
Elements of all these implications revealed themselves with the new Civil Partnership Bill, that hit a brick wall with the new added benefits for Heterosexual’s that are not in relationships based on eternal monogamous marital love. These are just a couple of implications, and Civil rights groups have top lawyers working with them and they are accepting the Civil Partnership Bill and indorsing it and promoting it without realising the full implications it has on the UK LGBT community. These were planed to be exposed, when the LGBT community civil rights groups support, promote and indorse laws on the founding principle of what means to be a Homosexual, for example with Heterosexuals that kind of law would be a marriage law.
The principles as to why it is paramount of importance to national security to have the legal terms changed in anti-discrimination laws on defining what the LGBT community are, as a minority, was so that any past or future laws in relation to the subject matter of that minority in relation to these new distinctions that define the LGBT community, would only ever be legally construed to the meaning of those legal distinctions. The ministry dossier’s main strategic basis national security on these changes to stop civil rights groups gaining genuine Homosexual marriage laws and curriculum materials of genuine Homosexual relationships, and change the basis of the entire political debate of Homosexuality to all society was to make the entire debate “irrelevant to religion”, making the debate even more grounded and powerful. If Homosexual marriage is construed by law as morally equal to Heterosexual marriage and works as such as a legal mechanism of law, the Government would have to constitutionally and legitimately teach Genuine Homosexual relationships and Homosexual marriage in schools to children.
The Church Of England and politicians have a weapon, the motive, the ammunition, and the target. When the Civil Partnership Bill become law, which is the governments biggest discriminating and dehumanising statement in 40 years of inequality that the LGBT community are not and never will be equal, and civil rights groups will be promoting, supporting and indorsing the it as the biggest victory point in the history of the fight for equality.
All politicians and the church will need to do when it is enforced after royal accent, is pull the trigger, and expose the true meaning of the terms in the Equality Bill and Sexual Orientation Regulations through a form of national news media, which on there own, will expose the true grounds behind the Civil Partnership Bill. And time is about run out.
This is an extensive and controversial investigation brief on the construction and implementation of the Equality Bill and the Sexual Orientation Regulations 2003, and the Civil Partnership Bill 2004.
The material in this brief is not a one-sided research dossier, it carries serious implications against civil rights actions, as well as the church and the government. This investigation, has found such far-reaching implications, and dangerous consequences against the LGBT community, that the government have never before achieved, or the LGBT community could ever fathom the consequences, or, are even aware of.
This is a complex puzzle that no one has put together before; this brief, puts that puzzle together, and is written with all the pieces of the puzzle in a specific order, to build up the factual and true finished picture. This brief contains information on sociology and psychology that may seem irrelevant or even strange and unnecessary to the issue of the laws contained in this brief, but if you brush through this brief to nitpick it for your own interests, then what you take from it, you will not understand on its own, or its implications. The information in this brief has been written to work as a whole, so that you will understand all the full implications of all the laws and legislation's written to work against the civil rights agenda for the LGBT community of the UK.
A statement that works for both sides of the debate.
Equality network, Edinburgh on the repeal section 2a
[Any written law that deliberately discriminates, is only acceptable, “if” it can be shown or proved, to be absolutely necessary for society.]
In October 2003, Section 28 was finally abolished… Well, so we thought…
[End Of Summery]
|
