|
Decrypting A Natural Inherent Code
© Copyright 2005 B-F-P Allrights reserved
Click Here to download a presentable pdf format of this document for printing or saving
A Dialogue By Jonathan J Joslin On Five Years Research Into The Psychology Of Sexuality
For centuries since society built an international social stigma over Homosexuality being a life choice of sex, many people from both sides of the debate over past four decades, have tried to make a distinction on sexuality to justify personal beliefs, possible realities and issues. Unfortunately every distinction that has been voiced by both side’s of the debate have left out one major factor on what sexuality actually is, and in doing so, they have institutionalise a premise that sexuality is behavioural based, which furthers the stigma of choice. For decades various religions, ministries, councils, sociology groups, health authority's, politicians and LGBT rights groups have made endless statements of belief that sexuality is apparently experimented and fixed at puberty between the ages of 10 to 16.
This is completely unfounded as the only individual’s qualified to give any true definition of sexuality would be a psychologist. Were these people 100% sure or have conclusive proof before making any voiced opinions or statutory claims. If you believe sexuality is experimented and fixed at a certain age, it can be explained why you would believe such a common premise. Contrary to what most people would like to believe, behaviour does not make sexuality. Are you confused? To find the truth on what makes human sexuality and find its point of origin, is by removing from a person, every material and physical need and want and all elements of motivation of material purpose as a member of society. This would only leave the natural inherent drive & soul purpose of a human being.
According to in depth research every child from the youngest ages can identify the inherent connection of which their natural drive directs them as they grow and see the people and the environment of people around them, and mainly within all other children around them. This is the inherent connection to a particular sex-(M/F), meaning the permanent inherent psychological and physiological connection to another gender regardless of sexual needs, of which can not be ignored, eradicated, turned on or off, or be manipulated, and most children will not understand it as sexuality, or recognise it as being sexual in anyway until around the ages of 5-7, and that is without any form of sexual experience or knowledge, but a child will recognise this inherent connection from the earliest ages. As every child is brought up in every different type of environment, it will be the up bringing by their parents on which that child would recognise their natural connection, more or less than others. As a child grows he or she will learn to understand what their sexuality means by the age of 8-11. Many young teenagers will have their first sexual experiences between the ages of 9 & 16 (this mainly, will not involve intercourse of any kind) and this has been wrongly labeled by official Government sources, politicians and national media's as “experimentation”.
To experiment in sex is to intentionally make a consented act of sexual conduct based on an adrenalin rush of sexual arousal without any coercion by sexual attraction or by an inherent connection to a particular gender- (M/F). Solely on the possibility of seeing if it appeals to one or if one might enjoy the experience of it with that type of person, on the basis of sexual relief or curiosity. Even if that gender-(M/F) of the consented other is a gender which he or she would or would not be normally sexually attracted.
Instead of a prompted responsive natural action based on a deep, natural, physiological & psychological attachment in a need to make physical contact based on a human driven sexual attraction through a naturally driven "inherent connection" to a particular gender.
If you are confused as to what this inherent connection means, it can be very easily explained. For example: If any person was to close their eyes and tried not to think about sex ever again, or tried not to fall in love, or tried to make every effort to work against feeling sexual for a particular gender-(male/female); they would still know, that if they were to continue to feel for another gender, what that gender is, that they are inherent connected too. You cannot remove that inherent connection, or even turn it off, or eradicate it, or work against it, and it is this inherent connection that makes sexuality, not the behaviour that acts on it, because what ever is inherent is from birth; anything else is acquired, meaning a choice. This hidden inherent core origin of sexuality is an unchangeable physiology to another gender from birth, in the chromosomes of the hypothalamus of the brain, which is the only scientifically known and proven part of the brain that establishes & controls all emotional states and sexual desires within a human being for another.
Sexual attraction is a main direct expression of that inherent connection; a person cannot be sexually attracted to any person that they are not inherently connected too, “or” who fits their personal visual preferences. Everyone has their particular type of person they are visually attracted to sexually by sight. For example: Heterosexual men are only attracted to particular types of females but not all females. They will not be sexually attracted to any woman that does not fit their personally preferred types. If a Heterosexual man pushes himself in the direction of woman that he is not sexually attracted to, any sexually physical outcome will only be based on the temporary arousal or lust if and when it manifests itself simultaneously between both parties for that man and woman to achieve any form of sexual gratification, which is usually either based on sexual oppression, sexual desperation through unavailable personal preference types, or experimentation on trying different things. The inherent connection of sexuality will naturally disallow any “want” or “emotionally motivated sexual need” to be drawn to any individual they are not sexually attracted too and these individuals will not be their personal preference type regardless of being inherently connected to that particular gender. Thus separating the intrinsic inherent physiology from any behavioural needs, showing the inherent connection is what makes sexuality, and not the behaviour or sexual choices that acted on it, which constitutes an obvious drawn line between the two. Many believe other sexualities are a ‘life choice’ and as many of the accused refute this accusation, others believe they themselves made such a life choice without separating that inherent physiological connection, from physical needs. Although it is a fact that not one recorded scientific institution, religion or government globally has ever come close to the correct conclusions to produced material to separate the two.
To understand a genuine flaw in these experimentation and life choice presumptions, here are full distinctions and psychology on the perceived, believed and refuted sexualities.
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meanings of
Sexuality: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of a particular gender.
Name: All who go under that name; a family, a clan, individual, people, minority, or race; within the meanings or the terms of the name. (Also applies to inanimate objects)
[The following distinctions below have been constructed from in-depth B-F-P research and a 300 person survey on the London LGBT social scene to cover many different beliefs which do differ, but it is still important to understand those other beliefs as well your own.]
Heterosexuality: An unchangeable inherent connection from birth, to find a permanent state of eternal monogamous love towards ‘only’ persons of the opposite sex.
[The name Heterosexual is the abbreviation of Heterosexuality, to mean the individual person]
[The largest percent Heterosexual society believe and state that this is what makes them Heterosexual, however there are many who do not believe in the existence of such a nature that is “only” driven towards the opposite sex from birth]
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meaning
Heterosexual: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of the opposite sex.
Equal to the official meanings of Bisexual and Homosexual, as it only carries inherent and immutable characteristics and no characteristics of behaviour that acts on those inherent characteristics.
Bisexuality: Bisexuality is a variable physiology of an unbalanced inherent connection from birth to find a permanent state of eternal monogamous love towards persons of both sexes.
But!
The birth state of the inherent connection is not always equally balanced, as many Bisexuals are born with a more predominantly driven inherent connection to one gender-(M/F) more than the other.
[This is from birth, and the inherent connection is identifiable at the earliest ages of childhood in all people regardless of sexuality. A child will personally identify a close connection to the gender he or she is driven to by sight, before any forms of sexual needs or aspirations are ever felt. As with any sexuality the nature of understanding sexual needs is only experienced after adolescence and through maturity where a person becomes more self-aware through the growth of knowledge on sexual experience and needs.]
But because of the unbalanced nature, Bisexuals will become to understand which of the genders he or she is more predominant driven towards for more pleasurable sexual relations in relation to the most predominantly driven connection, over the psychological measuring of sexual needs. Which can leave them later in life ‘to believe’ that their sexuality was experimented and then became permanent or a choice at puberty, and this leaves many to believe their sexuality was not naturally set from birth. There are Bisexuals more or less equally balanced from birth and at youth can or will base their first sexual experience or most enjoyed and preferred experience with a particular ‘gender-(M/F) and never explore the other as many unbalanced Bisexuals do. But they will still have a natural drive for both genders-(M/F), as the desire for the ‘preferred’ gender will be the most influential. This can or will make the inherent connection for the other gender-(M/F) less desirable, and almost unnoticeable and for many ‘nonexistent’ but not eradicated or a miss-understandable avenue of sexuality.
(For Example*: A boy in his youth before any form of sexual experience in life, feels emotionally & inherently connected to both genders, but is predominantly driven to one gender more than the other. Later in life after sexual experience, he becomes to understand that predominantly driven connection and does not consciously continue towards the other gender, or feel any need to explore the gender again or pursue it further.)
It is rare but later in life a Bisexual sexual attraction can ‘sometimes’ vary, and may start re-exploring the other gender-(M/F) by whatever unlimited possibilities. For example: through sexual experiences or lengthy periods of time surrounded by people of the other gender (M/F) creating psychological intimacy. However, when it comes to falling in love with either gender-(M/F), it will only be by whatever attraction to one gender-(M/F) that comes first, and never both simultaneously.
Bisexuality is extremely complicated but it is explainable by a differential gradient in an individual’s inherent connection from birth, based on what is above or below 50% on a particular gender [For example: Opposite sex 1% and Same sex at 99%]. The more or less equally balanced Bisexuals are around a 50-50% gradient, but it can all be brought down to three basic levels.
1. Opposite sex driven-Bisexuality: Inherently & predominantly driven from birth by 60 – 95% towards the opposite sex more that the same sex, with or without sexual experiences or relationships of the same sex through adolescence into maturity. Making the inherent drive for the same sex extremely vague but not misunderstood. Many opposite sex driven Bisexuals not only believe they are Heterosexuals, but believe this is what makes Heterosexuality if you do not veer towards the same sex.
2. More or less equally balanced Bisexuality: inherent connection towards both genders, but sexually they will find more pleasurable sexual experiences with one gender (M/F) more than the other sex (M/F).
3. Same sex driven-Bisexuality: Inherently & predominantly driven from birth by 60 – 95% towards the same sex more that the opposite sex, with or without sexual experiences or relationships of the opposite sex through adolescence into maturity. Making the inherent drive for the opposite sex extremely vague but not misunderstood. Many same-sex driven Bisexuals not only believe they are Homosexuals, but believe this is what makes Homosexuality if you do not veer towards the opposite sex.
Because of the international social stigma that Homosexuality is a choice, Bisexuals of every level, personally believe Homosexuality and Heterosexuality is a life choice, by either taking a well socially accepted and legally supported left turn in the road of life, or taking the unsupported right turn (metaphorically speaking). Although opposite sex driven and same sex driven Bisexuals believe sexuality is a choice, if one was to ask either of them the question: Can you give up and ignore that gender you are predominantly driven towards for the rest of your life, and concentrate solely on the other gender they are driven less towards. You will find that the only answer they could give, is no! But if was a optional life choice as they blindly believe, they should be more than capable of it. But social conditioning stops Bisexuals from realising you cannot make a choice on a fixed differential that was already naturally integrated, regardless of sexual needs or its unbalanced nature. B-F-P has found through its survey that the Bisexuals, regardless of which gradient level, would argue against and disbelieve without question the existence of any sexuality that has an inherent connection to only “one” sex from birth. Which is just a belief and an unproven one.
The “name” Bisexual is the abbreviation of Bisexuality, to mean the individual person.
[However the largest percent Heterosexual society do not believe in the existence of such a nature that is inherently connected towards both sexes from birth]
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meaning
Bisexual: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of both sexes.
Equal to the official meanings of Heterosexual and Homosexual, as it only carries inherent and immutable characteristics and no characteristics of behaviour that act’s on those inherent characteristics.
Homosexuality: An unchangeable inherent connection from birth, to find a permanent state of eternal monogamous love towards ‘only’ persons of the same sex.
The “name” Homosexual is the abbreviation of Homosexuality, to mean the individual person.
The Official Statutory Vocabulary Meaning
Homosexual: People with feeling and or attraction towards persons of the same sex.
Equal to the official meanings of Heterosexual and Bisexual, as it only carries inherent and immutable characteristics and no characteristics of behaviour that act’s on those inherent characteristics.
[The largest percent Homosexuals believe and state that this is what makes them Homosexuals, however the largest percent of Heterosexual society and all Bisexuals do not believe in the existence of such a nature that is “only” driven towards the same sex from birth with no connection to the opposite sex. Which leaves all Bisexuals and Heterosexuals, whether they believe its wrong or ok to be that way, to directly socially and politically victimising and discriminating against Homosexuals who state and believe this their nature]
Knowing that the life choice theory is not just confined Heterosexuals and Bisexuals or people who’s beliefs are created by religious teachings, I went to several specialist psychoanalysts to get 2nd and 3rd professional opinions on questions within the context of B-F-P’s research, and believe it or not, I found, a simple mental barrier that every human being has.
Most people naturally condition themselves into believing they look at issues of sexuality objectively, when in fact they are doing the complete opposite. Most people will not believe anything further than what they see with their own eyes. Behaviour does not make sexuality and beyond behaviour any individual's sexuality is not a visual state of being like skin colour is, whether Heterosexual, Homosexual or Bisexual. Any person will make a perspective look on others by their own knowledge and experience of their lives on how they know and understand what they are capable of within themselves as a person, and within their own nature that they identify on, to make correct assumptions and judgments.
For example; Every person will subconsciously remember all passed experiences in life, even from childhood to know how they would relate to future circumstances on making the correct conscious actions and judgments by assumption or conclusion on others in relation to themselves. In terms of this sexuality issue on the beliefs Homosexuality or life choices, any Bisexual or Heterosexual will always subconsciously or consciously conclude the nearest logical psychological denominator of which they could, would, should or might possibly be naturally capable of themselves, on which they naturally identify within their own inherent nature. Anything that is “not possible” within that persons inherent nature will be consciously distinguished as an alien concept to their morality, and they will only conclude the logical denominator that they could, would, should or might be capable of. Which is just looking at it from a single-minded point of view and not objectively, which makes a person incapable or unwilling to look past their own nature to contemplate a possibility that other sexualities exist, and will disbelieve without question any individual who tells them a distinction of they’re sexuality that is irrevocably different to theirs.
[Any person inherently connected to both sexes regardless of the unbalanced nature are advised to read the Bisexual perception of sexuality first, before reading the Heterosexual perception of sexuality as it may cause confusion or disillusion to the information being put forward here]
The general percpective of human sexuality from Heterosexuals inherently connected only to the opposite sex:
Since behaviour is a choice, and eternal monogamous love isn’t, and Heterosexuals are mentally incapable of such love or sexual attraction through any form of inherent connection to the same sex, to even come psychologically close to identifying it within their sexuality in any form. They will always subconsciously conclude the nearest natural denominator of which they are capable of, (which is not part of their inherent nature) as whatever is not inherent is acquired (meaning a choice) and on this issue a sexual choice, not a choice of love through inherent needs to the same sex, as it is ultimately impossible for Heterosexuals to achieve.
This leaves the largest percent of Heterosexuals to personal perceive and belief that the planets population is a totally Heterosexual human race connected only to the opposite sex, and inevitably instituting the international belief of Homosexuality and Bisexuality to the same sex as life choice of sex to be that way, with no natural or inherently driven characteristics. The international religious stigma of Homosexuality being a life choice to be that way will only be the biggest form of confirmation on any bias Heterosexual's assumption by natural perception on the issue. Heterosexuals do not realise an unbelievable flaw in this bias believe.
(For example: Heterosexual males are attracted to personal preferences of females, (but not towards all females). Any such life choice existence, is the same as believing where no sexual attraction exists regardless of the inherent connection logically means that a Heterosexual male and female that are neither sexually attracted to each other or filling any personal preference types, want to “willingly” choose to spend the rest of their lives committed to each other in such a situation based solely on temporary arousal if and when it manifests itself simultaneously between both man and woman to achieve any form of sexual gratification, and to spend the rest of their lives doing this.
Which means the bias Heterosexual life choice belief of Homosexuality, is believing that two Heterosexual men want to spend the rest of their lives together and wanting marriage and adoption laws, even though they are neither inherently connected to each other meaning they will never even achieve any form of sexual attraction, and basing this existence solely on a rare temporary arousal which logically would only be produced from experimentation, server sexual oppression, or isolation from the opposite sex. Meaning it would be a completely corruptible commodity and a waist of human existence whether Heterosexual or Homosexual. So why do the individual prejudice Heterosexuals disbelieve what Homosexuals say they are, and believe this bizarre life choice theory, when Heterosexuals are incapable of willingly achieving such a personally unfulfilling pointless lifelong committed choice to the opposite sex, let alone the same sex.
It is a fact that not one recorded scientific research institution or any institution in the history of the planet has ever proved Homosexuality is a life choice in the first place. The largest percent Heterosexual Agnostics & Atheists believe exactly the same choice theory, which constitutes the logical conclusion, that this belief is not based on or created by religion. If a Heterosexual who believes Homosexuality is a choice was to look past their nature and look at the issue of Homosexuality objectively without basing information on their own nature, they would realise that not one piece of external information or evidence exists to bring them back to the exact that same conclusion of any life choice to be that way.
The general percpective of human sexuality from predominantly same sex driven Bisexuals:
From the perspective of same sex driven Bisexuals between 60 to 95% inherently connected to the same sex, will only see Homosexuality or Heterosexuality in relation to their nature and be unwilling to look past that nature to accept or believe the existence of any sexuality presumed to be only connected to one gender.
Since behaviour is a choice and eternal monogamous love isn’t, and Bisexuals are inherently connected to both sexes from birth, and only understand the knowledge of their self-evident sexuality throughout their entire natural life (regardless of any imbalance), do not naturally identify with any inherent connection to only one gender-(M/F) from birth. Leaving them to personally believe and refute that neither Homosexuality nor Heterosexuality are fixed sexualities from birth towards only one gender, regardless how many Homosexuals or Heterosexuals tell them they are not naturally built that way.
As any form of such a prospect of only being connected to one gender would be an alien concept in relation to their Bisexual nature. Creating a mental block in perceiving every person around them to be the same, and leaving them to believe the global human population is born with a natural drive towards both sexes, that differs after adolescence & maturity to be drawn to one sex more than the other, to create what they believe to be Homosexuality or Heterosexuality by the difference of an optional choice of the natural desire in one direction or the other, and believing that a Bisexual is only a person who is more or less ‘equally’ driven towards both sexes.
Because of the internationally driven social stigma by prejudice genuine Heterosexuals (that Homosexuality is a life choice to be that way) the largest percent of Bisexuals through adolescence into maturity come to understand the predominant drive for one gender more than the other, and grow up into adulthood believing that dominant drive to be a life choice they made, leaving them less capable of drawing the distinction between the inherent connection and their physical needs, and basing that belief on the issue of sexual needs over being more drawn to one gender more than the other over of more enjoyed sexual and emotional feelings towards that preferred gender-(M/F). Without even realising that that was actually a naturally driven inherent nature that achieved that apocalypse.
It is impossible to make a choice on something that was already naturally integrated, and the inherent connection is what makes sexuality, not the sexual behaviour that act’s on it. The reason Bisexuals do not understand this, is because explaining the inherent connection of human sexuality to another person is very hard, let alone explaining it to themselves regardless of sexual needs, and since behaviour does not make sexuality and human sexuality is not a visual state of being, and no official sources have ever produced any materials that separate inherent physiology from behavioural needs in explaining it, leaving no institution, psychologist, or person to fully understand it properly, and B-F-P is the first organisation that ever has.
If’ Homosexuality and Bisexuality actually were a choice, it would be completely be logical to assume it to be a confused conditioned or choice of sexual needs towards the same sex. But, there is a missing link to that hypothesis that has never been objectively or logically surmised. [Whatever is possible has a likely standpoint to be proved impossible, but whatever has been proven not impossible has the most plausible standing point to be the most likely truth & fact]
The inherent connection of Heterosexuality or Bisexuality to the opposite sex is something you cannot remove, you cannot turn it off, or simply eradicate it, or even ignore it, even if a Bisexual is 95% driven towards the same sex. So if Homosexuality is a condition or a choice, it does not explain in anyway whatsoever why every genuine Homosexual worldwide in every so-called civilised country and indirectly connected, have been explaining, demonstration and stating they never have been, and never will be capable of feeling for or falling in love with any person of the opposite sex. That is something completely and ultimately impossible for a Heterosexual or Bisexual to achieve in life, even by choice…
Leaving the question: Is it ‘Impossible’ that some people are born genetically and inherently different to the larger majority?
No psychological manipulation or circumstance in life could possibly ever make an entire worldwide minority of Heterosexuals or Bisexuals incapable of being inherently connected to the opposite sex, to achieve any state of mind that does not understand what it must feel like to be inherently connected to the opposite sex to know that one might or might not fall in love that way. So why do Heterosexual and Bisexuals believe Homosexuality it is a choice? And WHY disbelieve a Homosexual when he says his sexuality is inherent from birth to only the same sex? Yet all Bisexuals do, without realising that disbelieving Homosexuals stating that they never have been capable of feeling anything for the opposite sex, qualifies as equally as discriminating and victimisation as prejudice Heterosexuals who dehumanise the global LGBT communities need for human rights over the belief of a life choice?
Same sex driven Bisexuals that believe they are Homosexuals, believe Heterosexuality to be the opposite life choice to the choice of Homosexuality. And a same sex driven Bisexual will believe that the prejudice argument of Heterosexual society to be solely based on self superiority of taking the well socially supported a left turn in life, instead of the right turn in life (metaphorically speaking) and the disagreement by disgust of a particular sexual behaviour without realising a simple dangerous equation that changes the grounds to that entire argument.
‘If’ a Heterosexual is a person who has the same inherent connection to both sexes from childhood, but is up to 95% driven towards the opposite sex, an opposite sex driven Bisexual would still completely understand the natural drive for the same sex after adolescence and maturity regardless how small that connection to the same sex is, which a same sex driven Bisexual would understand that tiny opposite sex connection: Why is it that every bias and prejudice Heterosexual regardless of religion or politics always demonstrates and states through politics and laws, their belief that: “there is no moral equivalence between Homosexuality & Heterosexuality, and call it abnormal and unnatural while demanding a 100% genetic evidence to prove it to be naturally inherent, to justify the LGBT fight for rights.”
Do same sex driven Bisexuals running campaign groups really be trusted to know what that moral equivalence is in relation to, and why prejudice Heterosexuals call it abnormal and unnatural and demand 100% genetic proof while stating everyone is natural, normally and inherently born Heterosexual” to only the opposite sex?
Is it a prejudice opposite sex-driven Bisexual argument about a disagreeable difference on sexual behaviour and the wrong socially unsupported turn in life? Or is it about believing in a non existing particular ‘morally needed’ inherent connection to the same sex, which would be unnaturally alien to genuine Heterosexuals who will judge things in relation to their nature, while demanding justification for the need for LGBT marriage laws, adoption, or recognition through human rights laws as an inherent dignity for protection from discrimination, victimisation, harassment and murder, or simply from global dehumanisation and death.
There is no difference in a socially conditioned life choice stigma whether a Heterosexual’s believe it is wrong or OK to choose to be that way against your perceived genuine Heterosexual nature. Some LGBT rights groups are waiting for the day that scientific institutions genetically prove Homosexuality to be inherent, while the majority of religious Heterosexuals endlessly demand the need for 100% genetic evidence to prove it to be naturally inherent first, to justify the LGBT fight for civil rights. But no one has even realised the mind boggling insanity, that there hasn’t been one scientific research institution in the history of the planet that ever proved it was a choice in the first place to have a justified legal need to spend endless tax payers money on genetically proving an inherent nature of an already existing minority, that Heterosexuals and Bisexuals are incapable of achieving such an existence themselves, even by choice.
A general percpective of human sexuality from Genuine Homosexuals only connected to the same sex:
Genuine Homosexuals are generally unaware of Bisexuals that believe they are Homosexuals, and would only understand Bisexuality to be a more or less equally balanced nature towards both sexes. because of a life of persecution Genuine Homosexuals have learnt to look at thing objectively and do generally realise and understand that Heterosexuals are only inherently driven to the opposite sex from birth, because they themselves are incapable of feeling in any way whatsoever for the opposite sex, showing an obvious opposite nature to Heterosexuality. Although, it does not stop that mental barrier from kicking in now an again and perceiving the possibility there might be a little bit of Homosexuality in there somewhere. But those perceived possibilities on Heterosexuals from Genuine Homosexuals are usually based on sexual attraction to a Heterosexual male, without realising the psychologically perceived contradiction to the reality of things. (Apologies to any genuine Homosexuals reading this whose hearts have just been broken)
The logocal objective conclusive findings of research conducted by B-F-P have found that the living distinctions of all the sexualities explained above, exists, which by iradicating the the impossible, does not need 100% a DNA and genetic researcch to prove 100% a logical point and fact of nature. B-F-P spent five years researching extensively on sociology, science, psychology, and globally on every type of scientific, state health, psychological and religious institutions who have attempted to find the causality and basis of Homosexuality. Unfortunately all of these global research institutions have missed this simple equation of separating inherent physiology from behavioural needs, and only basing all researched academic studies on measuring sexual behaviour, without even making any attempts to look at or find the logical confines of Heterosexuality in relation to a minorities voiced self identified premise of Homosexuality to only the same sex. This objectively exposes the prejudice research insstitutions measuring sexual need from a single minded point of view. Without looking at what is and is not possible with in that natural construct of only being driven, connected, or attracted to the opposite sex, and how far in life Heterosexuals would go on a committed ‘same sex’ life choice with each other where there is no mutual attraction or sexual desire based on deep emotional needs.
All for the sake of resolving a conflict solely based on the unproven evident-less personal beliefs of prejudice individuals the larger majority who use the Bible as their foundation of (void) evidence to blanket dehumanisation and death on a minority of human beings, saying Homosexuality is a life choice to be that way and the Bible is the truth, even though the Bible actually teaches to look for truth in the reality of things pertaining to this life. But every religion based on the Bible, interprets the Bible literally word for word without realising that 50 to 60% of the Bible is written in analogies and metaphors, and then they use all the sections that explain Heterosexuals should not acted against their nature with sexual needs which is punishable by death as a the founding basis of belief on Homosexuality. Even though there is not one version of the entire Bible worldwide that carries one recorded word, sentence, parable, gospel or story on any person who actually did sexually act against their nature, that explains they ever made any form of permanent life long committed choice against their nature to that sexual act. AND THAT IS A FACT!
As a genuine Homosexual my self, I completely agree that a Heterosexual should not go against their nature with anything, as there would be no personally achievable natural or moral future in it; which is obviously why those sections in the Bible were written to point out.
Regardless how many bias Heterosexuals without evidence disbelieve without question what Homosexuals say they are; when a minority of human beings have been stating and campaigning for endless decades on social & human rights and legal issues like marriage, joint co-habitation rights, joint pensions, inheritance, insurances, adoption, surrogacy, schooling curriculum’s on same-sex marital love and relationships, immigration & refugee asylum protection from execution. Protection from global dehumanisation through discrimination, victimisation, harassment resulting to the degradation of mental health and the need of European human rights court status as an inherent dignity to simply & legally support an obviously opposite nature that Heterosexuals are incapable of achieving, even by choice. Does this constitute and qualify an irrefutable drawn line between what the Bible states in relation to the nature of Heterosexuality, and what Homosexuals are as a minority of human beings?
No individuals who are in such a supposed committed life choice would logically have any need to fight for such basic human rights, because there would be no psychological coercion between each other as a minority for the need for those rights, let alone fight for those rights. All global scientific institutions researches, have been conducted by Heterosexual’s judging all subject matters of Homosexuality in relation their own Heterosexuality.
Since no materials exist for government, scientific or psychological institutions to understand the masses of people suffering from server mental degradation, over oppression from their own parents, family, schooling, religion, friends, work, social environments, the state, governments, laws, and every form of international stigma driven entertainment media, that not only disbelieve without question what these people struggling for a normal life, are trying to tell them, or ask of them. Because of the "social stigma" that Homosexuality is a life choice, many same sex driven Bisexuals believe they have made such a life choice as they’re predominantly driven to the same sex, and believe they are a Homosexuals that were once a Heterosexuals and never believe they are permament Bisexuals.
And within this belief, some religious same sex Bisexuals have been found to have now gone to special aversion psychotherapy to revert back to what they believe to be Heterosexuality. And in doing so, it has been known that such psychotherapy has successfully made them more preferable to the opposite sex, but also making them believe they are now Heterosexual again, when in fact they are not. This therapy does not work on genuine Heterosexuals or Homosexuals, as they inherently fixed sexuality's by an inherent connection to only "one gender" not two to perpetuate any differential, making such manipulative therapy impossible for many. Many religious Heterosexuals believe Homosexuality can be eradicated by such therapy because of this common misconception brought about by these confused Bisexuals. But if any religious person believed Homosexuality was not a choice in relation to this therapy they would be believing that an inherent sexuality to only one gender-(M/F) like Heterosexuality to be completely corruptible through mental manipulation.
So many Bisexuals that called themselves Homosexuals that have been changed by such reversion psychotherapy now call them Heterosexuals and ex-gays. Which has induced, indorsed and justified the religious and political belief that Homosexuality is life choice, even if science proved Homosexuality to be 100% genetically inherent and natural. No psychologists have such materials to help edify their knowledge to help people in desperate need globally, and that is without the fact that most Heterosexual psychologists will believe they are looking at every individuals problems objectively where an issue arises based on sexuality, but they will just be naturally looking at it from the logical perspective of their own sexuality which unfortunately is totally irrelevant to the other persons.
There is an international anomaly over statistics institutions on whom society like to emulate that 1 in every ten people are gay making the rough statistics of the LGBBT populace in the UK to be about 10% of the UK’s population. UK’s population is almost 62 million, so that means that the rough estimate of the LGBT populace in the UK would be roughly around 6.2 million. Global statistics of suicide rates for children between the ages of 10 to 20yrs old have been calculated in so-called civilised countries to be in the thousands per year, and mostly between 3 to 4 thousand yearly and on rare occasions up to 7 thousand, but this statistic has brought with it a serious dilemma. If the LGBT community are roughly more or less then 10% of the population, why are officially reported statistics on childhood suicides reporting that ‘over half’ of all childhood suicide rates of young children and teenagers are sexuality related. This qualifies as a serious problem and a mysterious one.
For years, health institutions and Universities have been trying to help lobby groups find the core of the problem as to why the largest percent of Homosexuals have the highest rate of mental stress syndromes and suicide rates globally and are catching HIV and Aids and so exponentially. Unfortunately these institutional research findings have been obtained by a seriously flawed research basis (no matter how expertly they were done) that no one has realised, because of a major factor that has been completely missed in all global research findings to find the core of the problem. The basis of all national and international professional research institutions done to find the core problem was conducted by examining social scene environments of the LGBT community that unreservedly promote and condition a lifestyle to find sex with nothing to contradict it, and these research institutions based their materials on measuring sexual behaviour and sexual needs only. The true missing factor to the core of the problem was not any aspects of the LGBT community’s social sex scene environment, or ‘the measuring any form of sexual behaviour’, regardless of how much pornography and the need for sex is conditioned into society as a whole.
At the heart of Heterosexual society is the international conditioning from childhood on principles, standards, values, integrity and character on understanding what is important in life, things like legal standing, monogamy, love, sex, pornography, principles, standards, integrity, traditions, religion, culture, ideals, lifestyles, stereotypes, stigmas, national domestic country problems, violence, prejudices, hate, discriminations, morally doing the right thing, warnings, dangers, optional preferences on things to avoid; behaviours, being, having, doing, dismissing, disbelieving, acknowledging, ignoring, truth, looking, searching, denying, knowing, believing, deceit, lies and hypocrisy.
This conditioning starts from childhood and the reason for this as most things in understanding life, is the manipulation of the mind in psychological ethics ands mental growth of the population from childhood, in making sure they know and understand what to aim for in life and about life in general, and not just what's important but ‘why’ it’s important whether they take and use such materials on advice and conditioning, and use it or not. This conditioning in children is bombarded at them from every angle of life: Family / parenting / schools / religion / culture / traditions / socio-environments / politics / law / friends / work, and every form of international media.
This makes one wonder where Heterosexual society would be if no such ‘core conditioning’ guidance on society had ever existed, or was even ‘conditioned’ the complete opposite to work against such naturally important instinctive goals. So would it not be irrelevant for any Heterosexual to say they can simply ignore such conditioning? Could one say is it not the fault of the individual if he or she does not make the right choices in life?
All these things are not just conditioned from childhood on the basis of what should be right, these are all elements that are conditioned through the power of suggestion to the subconscious that one identifies with one’s own specific nature, giving purpose to aspire to better oneself in achieving a natural goal. If not one image had ever been conditioned, guided, displayed, promoted, written about, sung about, taught about, lawfully & rightfully instated or laid down by religion or state government about a man and woman wanting to spend their lives together in love till the day they die, with a need and want for children based on that feeling to know how precious children really are, then Heterosexual society would feel confused to such a conceivable prospect for these fundamental conditioning tools to have never existed.
Such a prospect would be an alien concept to Heterosexuals, as it would be hard to identify the possible consequences of this ‘conditioning guidance’ if it never ever had existed. [An Alien concept: is an original idea, position or prospect that has never been known, explained, promoted, conditioned or demonstrated ever before].
For every Heterosexual in every ‘so-called’ civilised society without exemption is conditioned and guided by it from every conceivable angle to subconsciously identify with it to understand it in relation to their nature from childhood, whether the promotion of sex and pornography is equalising or over balancing this fundamental conditioning, and whether they take & utilise such conditioning guidance or not. It is not only unavoidable without a choice or having to look for it, It is Inevitable!…
But, In relation to a minority of human being solely connected to the same sex,
“Not one piece of such fundamental core conditioning guidance material, Exists”!…
"And never has"
Any core guidance materials on any sexuality should be as easily seen to all ‘without a choice’ and conditioned to all throughout their entire natural lives without having to look for it, just like Heterosexual society always has been. A Bisexual from young will understand that one inherent avenue of their nature is fully supported in every conceivable way within Heterosexual society and they can subconsciously extrapolate how to understand the other rejected avenue that is not supported in relation to it. But a Bisexual or Heterosexual could not possibly fathom the consequences on a person’s life when their nature does not have that inherent avenue that is supported by Heterosexual society and only has the nature that is rejected from the largest majority of society. Governments (guided by religion and prejudice people in society) have always stated; If Homosexuals believe they are equal to Heterosexuals, then they should prove their civil liberties and live morally the same as Heterosexual society by utilitarianism.
The meaning of “Utilitarianism” [; 1, The doctrine that actions are right if they are useful or for the benefit of the majority by the greatest happiness of the greatest number, should be the guiding principles of conduct for all…]
Unfortunately in relation to genuine Homosexuality, there’s one major draw back and inevitable ‘brick wall’ with that ideal that Heterosexuals state against the Homosexuals fight for rights. Because, not only does no core material conditioning guidance exist on genuine Homosexality; every genuine Homosexual from childhood and throughout their entire natural lives are without exemption subjected and conditioned by every prejudice aspect of Heterosexual society to know and understand the projected prospect of the complete and total opposite.
That anything Natural, Normal, Acceptable, Sociably Inclusive, Legal, Lawful, Moral, Monogamous, Permanent, Lifelong, Committed, Traditional, Cultural, Marital, Religious, Civil, Rightful, Human, Maternal, Procreative, Parental, Eternally Loving and Equal has not only absolutely nothing to do with Homosexuality, but that Homosexuality has no natural human level of equivalence to Heterosexuality for these things to even be applicable to them, and not just for the hear and now, but for the long run. This makes all the rejected fundamental important aspects and ideals of Heterosexual society to the naturally instinctive needs of Homosexuals to be an alien concept. Leaving an entire minority of human beings to figure out life as they go alone, and basing any personally needed goals on the nearest natural denominator to achieve that objective.
This opposite conditioning is at a never ending constant, through all forms of victimisation, indirect and direct discrimination and harassment from childhood in witnessing every form of disgust on Homosexuality, through family, religion, state, education, social society, promoted government laws, issues, and every form of national stigma and stereotyped media (TV / books / film / music / magazines etc), even through every gay media and political press produced by those who support them and believe it is OK to choose to be that way. For every genuine Homosexual from childhood without exemption is conditioned by it, it is not only unavoidable with nothing to contradict it. It is inevitable!..
Any Homosexual ‘from birth, or at any age’ that spends their life around an environment that exposes, influences, induces, institutionalises and endorses every form of such a sexual lifestyle of that nearest natural denominator they understand and every avenue to obtain it, and absolutely nothing to contradict it. Homosexuals no matter what age will without a doubt, be very susceptible to being directly and permanently psychologically conditioned to live it. And they will end up knowing absolutely no different, because there is no promoted contrary conditioning imagery or material to it, and they will follow others by example whatever that example is without realising the other’s same disposition. Making it an unfortunately more powerful and perfectly grounded basis for conditioning sex addiction. The most fundamentally needed conditioning materials are curriculum materials in schools on the true human spectrum of sexuality as a whole, inclusive of genuine loving Homosexual relationships. So that young Homosexual teenagers can have some form of conditioned goal in life to aspire too, to achieve, while Heterosexual children who will perceive things exactly the same way as any adult inevitably would, could learn the reality of things in relation to sexuality and Homosexuality as normal, and as inherent as skin colour. This would eventually stop the conditioned homophobic bullying and in tern reduce the mental degradation of any person with an inherent connection to the same sex, that the average parent couldn’t possible fathom the damaging consequences without it. Since laws like Section 28 that legally prohibited such teaching materials into society, the only other people to push such conditioning imagery or materials, are LGBT civil rights & advisory groups. Whom are the only people and groups who have that position, status and resources to push these into LGBT social environment into promoting such fundamental necessities as a minority. Because they have never needed any law, right or permission from any government, church or the rest of society to do that and they’ve have nearly 40 years to do it. So where is it, regardless of Section 28?
National Statistics like to speculate that 1 in every ten people are gay, and since the UK population 62 million, this would make the UK LGBT community more or less around 6.2 million. So those statistics in relation to the belief systems would be very interesting.
[Same sex driven Bisexuals are saturating the civil rights system, and have been since the fight for equality began. But the fight for equality has been based on the premise of Bisexual belief, that the oppression is from a so-called Heterosexual society that chose to be straight and refuse civil rights on premise that Heterosexual sex is more superior because of a socially, legally, morally and religiously supported left turn in life instead of an immoral right turn. LGBT rights groups for the past forty years, because this belief, have been voicing that the oppression from Heterosexual society is a sexual apartheid; when the true fight for equality is a completely different ball game]
The government and LGBT civil rights groups like to emulate their so-called belief in an ungrounded statistic that the LGBT community have excelled in the fight for equality because of the exponential recognition and acceptance of the LGBT community. But the question needs to be asked, recognised and accepted as what exactly? There’s no difference in the conditioning of a prejudice stigma between people that believe its wrong or OK to choose to be that way, especially when a percentage of those people are in that oppressed community who believed they made that choice, when choice has nothing to do with it! Both sides of the entire debate believe their debate on the issue is an irrefutable one-way argument, and in doing so they have both set themselves up in the biggest discrimination game of the new millennium, without realising the facts of reality; that neither side of ‘any debate’ is infallible. As both opposing sides of the debate are endlessly and blindly smashing their heads up against the most unbelievable invisible brick wall known to historical debating, with a metaphoric game of tennis in trying to destroy the opponent with an unproven belief through a verbalised prêt election of irrelevancy demonstrating an unforeseen own goal. Without making any attempt whatsoever to understand the opponent or contemplating the fact of reality that you cannot fight fire with fire; you must understand what ignited it in the first place.
These 2000 year old globally social, legal and religious constructs of conditioning solely based on natural single-minded prejudice bias confirming personal perceptions into belief for both sides, have developed a multitude of complex paradox’s of mutually conflicting dependant conditions which have created a catalyst of endlessly looping dilemmas and circumstances of which there is no escape. Or to be precise; the biggest catch 22 and a 360 degree fight against oppression of which neither side of the entire controversial debate know the cause or the core of the problem that created it, and the situation sustaining it, or understand any genuine reality of truth to workout any form of constructive conclusion to resolve it; regardless that this is the only debate on the entire planet that has no neutral party to delegate any winning rights on any possible resolve.
B-F-P is the only organisation that has broken this code of the ‘choice theory’ and is making every effort get other LGBT organisations to listen, but this research is not only contrary to popular belief, it is contrary to the LGBT civil right lobby groups understanding of the fight against oppression, creating enemies from both sides of the debate in keeping things the way they already are. B-F-P has every intention of trying to contact psychologist institutions for constructive feedback on our research in relation to any study cases, but this is being hindered by lack of funding, and we will get there. In many cases nationally promoted distinctions of inherent dignity on specific minorities can be discriminatory, but in this case, I truly believe a national distinction must be made!
Many LGBT rights groups have argued against B-F-P pushing an agenda against Bisexuals who believe they are Homosexuals as discriminatory to their personal beliefs to accept themselves as Bisexuals not Homosexuals and that the oppression is not a sexual apartheid. But this belief is equally as bias, prejudice and damaging to genuine Homosexuals as the Heterosexual belief over Homosexuality as a life choice of sex with nothing to do with characteristics of inherent dignity. Which LGBT civil rights groups feel justified in fighting against this bias Heterosexual belief system, even though this fight for equality is equally as discriminatory against Heterosexuals personal ideals over others in believing it is a choice. The freedom and protection of natural life of a human minority from physical and mental degradation through destructive dehumanisation is fundamentally more important than any majority’s idealism’s, which one assumes the LGBT community have been fighting for rights based on that premise. So to argue that its OK for one to fight to change the Heterosexual belief system, but wrong to fight against Bisexuals who believe they’re Homosexuals who create equally as much damage would be unjustified colonial hypocrisy and fascism.
Almost everyone would rather not make any attempt to contemplate any possibilities that might be contrary to their opinions and beliefs. It is said that if a large group of people were given information that logically contradicts what they believe however much they agree with that information, only 2% percent of that group would open up and voice acceptance to question that contradiction and the rest would be only glad someone voiced it for them. Because owning up to mistakes takes guts, and nobody wants to look the fool, or have to be the one to take on the responsibility taking their thumb out of their arse to change what's being done wrong.
["Tolerance" is forced acknowledgement & acceptance without any true form of understanding, and the only way to truly understand anything, is to ask questions.]
Arthur Conan Doyle : Sherlock Holmes
Anything is possible, until it is proven without a doubt to be impossible.
If you eliminate the “impossible”, you're left only with what ”is probable".
Then by exploring the most plausible, however improbable,
Will always reveal the truth..
Closing comments
The meaning of Philosophy;
1, The use of reason & argument in seeking truth and knowledge of reality; esp. of the causes of the nature of things and of the principle's governing existence , the material universe, perception's of physical phenomena and human behaviour.
2, a) A system "or" set of beliefs reached by this process.
If human sexuality is experimented and fixed, then not only no sexuality whatsoever would be inherent from birth, any sexuality would be completely corruptible, and that would be a logical fact. No Heterosexuals has ever made any statutory claims of choosing Heterosexuality, which by the facts of the inherent nature should be an unchangeable existence. You won't find a Heterosexual that believes it is corruptible, because every Heterosexual not only naturally knows by there own nature that it isn't, which is true, every religion and government have stated it.
So to indorse discrimination through the constitutionalism of dehumanisation by nations of Heterosexuals making statutory accusations of a universal fantasy premise that a global scale minority of Heterosexuals have permanently gone against their nature in forcing themselves against their inherent need for the opposite sex for the rest of their lives to live without love, for the sake of anal sex based on arousal if and when it manifests itself simultaneously between both parties to achieve any sexual gratification in basing such life long committed choice, makes the nature Heterosexuality as a naturally inherent fixed sexuality to the opposite sex, to be completely and totally self destructive, manipulative and a corruptibly disposable commodity of human existence."
Whether Homosexuality ‘is a choice, or not’: every Church on the planet states; it is against God, Christ & the Bible to segregate who does and does not apply to being part of religion, the scriptures, God’s laws and Christ, because to do so would contradict the founding principle of Biblical prophesy. Biblical prophesy means and explains that God, Christ, the Bible and the scriptures “is for everyone”. Which mean “it is for everyone”; otherwise through separatism, idealism, prejudice, hate and segregation of others, even if you segregate yourself from others over ideals of self-superiority, you make it meaningless!
But then every religion based on the Bible prejudicially segregates every man woman and child of the global LGBT community from ever being morally part of ‘or’ involved in any religious denomination based on the Bible, and then uses them as a target of evil for the rest of the prejudice individuals in global society to load their moral separatist gun against, with a fantasy ammunition of personal preferences over an idealism based of self-superiority, and then conditions them to fire, Calling it religious belief, Not Hate!
When looking for the obvious logical facts and truths, does one necessarily need DNA and genetic research to prove 100% an obvious logical point or fact of nature? The distinction above is the true factual meaning of philosophy, and if the worlds prejudice populous haven’t just simply judged the entire debate in relation to their own natures over the past 2000 years, “what was it” that Heterosexuals, Bisexuals, the governments, global scientific institutions, health authorities, global society, religion and every churches theology, sophistry, doctrines, interpretations and beliefs based on, that brought them to any form of conclusion that Homosexuality is a life choice to be that way?
What ever happened to common sense?
However encrypted breaking a code is hard, and can take up to 2000 years before it is broken. Unless you know what that primer key means, protecting it from being decrypted.
|
